CV20-00849830 FEB.11-2021 H.D.JAN.15-2021a

 

TO the presiding Ottawa Court Justice hearing the below case on Feb. 11-2021 (sealed envelope to court filed with this account. cc Cavanagh LLP

COURT OPTION:

To either dispense with the claim below as being 'without merit' and award me similar 'significant costs' parallel to which the Appellant would request

OR

respond in detail to the myriad questions related to fraud as seen through many institutions on a written basis. Without that level of court investigation, claims related to the original lay-off in B.C., the ON version commencing with the Ford ascension to the gov't.(CV18000 76950), the  Franco Alulio action I laid to which he never responded (CV20-82943) nor has the Ottawa Court seen fit to give me a Hearing Date; Justice Rosalind Conway Hearing Feb. 27-2020 (19-SC-155235) where she failed to deal with the issues, leading for my call for her recusal; no reports on the alleged fraud for separate reasons for the two lawyers named in the current action from the ON Legal Society nothing can proceed without this court being labeled just another 'whitewash job'. The Canadian Justice Ministry and the gov't. of democratic Canada would be no more leaving us at the mercy of U.S. Marines. I must be in attendance by telephone as COVID-19 concerns and my age (79) leave me highly vulnerable to infection. (I have never found the Ottawa law courts to be all that sanitary in any event.) Two earlier factums have been supplied to the Court for this purpose and this marks the third such entry. (SEE website: rogercallow.com CV20-849830 for all three factums of this Respondent.)

 

 

Yours truly, (signed) Roger Callow  January 15-2021.

 

On Dec. 08-2020, as Respondent, I wrote on CV20-849830:

 

ORAL ARGUMENT - A PERSPECTIVE ON CV20-849830 - (FEB. 11-2021 Hearing Date)

BY: RESPONDENT Roger Callow in 'Bissonnette vs Callow' (Bissonnette (B.) is a lawyer represented by Cavanaugh  LLP's Kris Dixon, both of whom I have accused of malfeasance to the Ontario Legal Society. That body has never responded to any of the very serious legal concerns which I have written about these two of which a detailed Report is a major factor in these current legal events. Hence a follow-up hearing must be scheduled by this court.

BACKROUND:

1) In 2013, the B.C. Courts expelled plaintiff Roger Callow from the B.C. Justice  System for 'reasons best known to a judge' in an unresolved labour matter where no compensation had been paid dating back to 1985. The matter reverted to courts across Canada plus the Federal court in order to get redress for, as an employee laid off for economic reasons from my senior teaching position in June of 1985 under B.C.'s neophyte imposed BILL 35, I was entitled to compensation whether it be under Bill 35, the collective bargaining process, or any other code relating to employment matters. I have sued the West Vancouver School Board in many courts of law with the current outside non-prejudiced settlement offer of $20 million. All judges, and there have been over 50 across Canada rely on the frivolous and vexatious rules, it is submitted here, to duck out of their responsibilities.

2) The Ontario phase of this case begins in 2014 and is the progenitor of the current case relating to the Premier Doug Ford government seeking to hamstring my case with a fake driver's license suspension by Ministry of Transport-Medical, Franco Alulio with whom I have a $10  million action against him for which he failed to respond: CV20-82943. On his own recognizance and without taking argument, he perverted the driver suspension form in Oct. of 2019 to read psychiatric disorder, a term which cannot be tested in medicine, with a number of medical clinics turning the re-testing down. Further, a lawyer I had on other matters dropped off with the use of the above mentioned term stating correctly, that no lawyer could represent me under these circumstances. Hence I represent myself legally. Oversight bodies e.g. Ontario A.G. Doug Downey do not respond to my requests on this dangerous precedent leading me to turn to the U.S. as this stunt could easily turn into a 'cottage industry' for organized crime. Many other Canadian politicians, institutions, and media have also turned their back. If President Trump is unwilling to act to protect U.S. interests, then it is incumbent on President Biden to act in lieu of the Canadian authorities.

3) No connection has been shown between the actions which remain undefined by Alulio and any medical Doctor although it would appear that a redacted letter on October 15 immediately before the suspension letter to take effect on November 01-2019, from my former medical Doctor, the young Dr. Jahagirdar (Dr. J.) of Towngate Family Medicine, appeared to have some knowledge for which the current request for disclosure was made from Bissonnette (B). That request promoted, I submit, the following shenanigans from B.

4) The following is a pejorative account on my part. B. sought to deflect my claim for disclosure from Dr. J. by claiming that the Clinic had no say in such as the disposition of a Doctor's medical file. That was the issue before Small Claims Court Justice Rosalind Conway on February 27-2020 which, under highly unusual circumstances, she failed to act on that question. I called for her recusal in which she had met privately with B. before I was called into the hearing. She altered the terms of B.'s presentation to me from a 'Mandamus Court' to one of a 'Dispute Resolution Court' not telling me who, indeed, called for this court in the first place. 'There is no such thing as a mandamus court' she opined. Unfortunately the Law Society has failed miserably in not reporting on this debacle. In that Feb. 27 meeting, I stated that I had no argument with the two lawyers and was quite willing to drop all charges against them if I was provided with my entire medical file which is my property and not that of a medical Doctor. Mayor Jim Watson and Police Chief P. Sloly were remiss in not acting on my request to seize the remainder of my file without which, at age 79, I cannot get another Doctor.

5) On August 28, I asked the Ottawa Superior Court as to the status of cases I had filed. Yet, Dixon esq. has no problem accessing the courts even behind the scenes during the recent lock-down in terms of approaching Master Kaufman without my knowledge and certainly without my consent. The amazing thing is that Kaufman even wrote a Decision for Dixon. Hence, by rights, Dixon should not be representing B. I ask the court here to determine that question.

6) On Dec. 02, I received back my rebuttal factum from the Court contesting the Plaintiff's argument  stating that they would provide evidence in court as opposed to providing it to me currently for my review. One such appeal from Saskatoon in 2018 to New Brunswick courts currently for fraud is based on the B.C. lawyer faking an unrelated 500 word factum from a previous court session with a clever cover letter by that lawyer which fooled the judge but, here is my point, the judge ordered that document to be placed in my hands revealing that subterfuge before I returned to court leading to an Action in New Brunswick for fraud. (In 2014, an ON justice, C. McKinnon, created 3 different Decisions on the same matter; none referencing the other='would the real Colin McKinnon please stand up'. There was no investigation from the Cdn. Council of Judges.) The Ottawa court's rejection which I returned with my documents was on a spurious Original Affidavit Required which is not detailed in Form 18A. It seems that with digital hearings, such paper arguments which always appear in court may be sidetracked in digital format. I request that the judge ask for my Respondent submission should the Registrar have failed to pass along this vital material which I returned.

7) A central question for the Registrar is why the Plaintiffs in CV20-849830 are able to supplant my previously laid cases making their case redundant? On those grounds alone, the above case should be thrown out of court with costs to me. Their case has been scheduled for Feb. 11 at 10 A.M. for two hours. I still have no dates for my cases.

8) While I include reference to media personalities, the situation is such that only President Biden can make any difference to a nation bent on rack and ruin - assuming Trump does nothing - in taking down with it, as it does, the USA.

 

ACTION REQUIRED:

1) Dismiss Claim of B. and Dixon with costs for being frivolous and vexatious.

2) Order either these two lawyers or the Ottawa police to acquire my complete medical file. If I get that, I will drop all claims against these two lawyers as stated in court on Feb. 27-2020.

3) Take those steps which would require the ON Legal Society to give a detailed Report on the activities of these two lawyers based on information which I have provided to them.

4) Call for the disclosure of the B.C. West Vancouver School Board meeting notes in July of 1985 by their legal counsel which led to a court Decision by Justice Mary Southin in 1986 to quash the arbitration favouring the Board ruling, in that process, the arbitrator to be patently unreasonable. The ordered re-arbitration never took place. I have since been left in limbo.

5) Ensure that my original rebuttal to CV20-849830 is included in this court hearing.

 

IN CONCLUSION, it is a major critique that such a nation as Canada has to go begging for justice to a foreign nation. The 35 year unresolved employeescasecanada.ca has reflected the fact that Canada does not have a Justice System; rather, merely a Legal System under the aegis of corrupt and corruptible judges and chief justices. This case did not create this debacle; it merely reflects what has been going on for decades in Canada but recently, has taken a turn for the worst. As matters stand, no Canadian can trust to a Canadian court of law. In brief, President Biden, Canada needs your help.

 

cc copy to PMO / Chrystia Freeland (which never responds nor does the ON Law Society)

cc ON Law Society (Jan.15-2021 Nothing received from the ON LEGAL SOCIETY)

cc 1) Nathan Gagnier

Motions Coordinator - CCR

Ministry of the Attorney General

Court Services Division

Civil and Small Claims Division  P.S. is this a Superior court or another Small Claims stunt?

161 Elgin Street, 2nd Floor

Ottawa, Ontario K2P 2K1

e-mail: nathan.gagnier@ontario.ca   Gagnier is asked to telephone me to discuss this matter;

                                                                  ( No contact made by Ottawa Court to me.  Jan.15-2021)

2) From: Kris Dixon <KDixon@cavanagh.ca>
Sent: Tuesday, December 1, 2020 10:53 AM

3) U.S.Embassy (Ottawa) by fax: 613-241-7845
4)  Andrew Coyne (Globe& Mail) Mark Bonokoski / Tarek Fatah (Ottawa Sun) Kelly Egan (Ottawa Citizen) Ellie Tesher (The Star) J. Ivison / C. Selby (National Post)

 

Yours truly, Roger Callow Respondent CV20-849830  December 08-2020

 

 

April 17-2020 (2 pages)                           APPENDIX  A

 

TO: Cavanaugh Lawyers                                      FROM: Roger Callow self represented plaintiff

400-411 Roosevelt Avenue,                               web: employeescasecanada.ca  2020 APRIL

Ottawa, ON K2A 3X9                                            encl. Ontario Law Society / Office of P.M.

t:613-780-2027  f:613-569-8668

 

RE: Statement of Defense: CV 20-82889  Callow v. Bissonnette esq (B.) received by e-mail:

April 16-2020 : two parts: April 16 a) 1 page letter from K. Dixon  b) 7 page (unsigned) Defence

 

MESSAGE: ATTENTION CEO

1) As a former high school English teacher, this factum is the most redundant of any which I have ever received and in marked difference from the firms CEO which showed an acuity of mind in an internet analysis far surpassing K. Dixon's account on behalf of Bissionnette esq. There wasn't even a signature to the factum. It is enough for other self-respecting lawyers in this firm to form a new Company apart from Cavanagh LLP.

2) Conspicuous by its absence was an approach made by Dixon to the court on March 10 to have this case dropped from the docket without a trial. Considering that as an unwarranted approach, I referred the matter to the ON Legal Society for investigation. No copy of that correspondence has been provided to this party. The case should not proceed until that finding is made explaining why this letter is addressed to the CEO

3) The one page letter - your File No. 1020-601 -  is a mish mash.

a) I did not deliver my claim to Bissonnette by courier as you ascertain.

b) There are other ways to deliver statements of claim and, as the court desk clerk put it...well they responded hence they have the factum.

c) Protesting on this picayune point is a piece of nonsense as I have always been willing - and still am - to give you extended time to file your material. Your April 16 filing date is therefore acceptable.

OTHER POINTS:

4) Invariably, all court cases are heavily dependent on disclosure. I will rephrase your wordy account thus: Bissionnette in representing Towngate Family Medicine (TFM) in 19-155235 Ottawa Small Debts Court filed by me on November 08-2020 is correct in noting that  the central question for TFM lies in their relationship with the Doctor's Partners and the general overall operation of the clinic e.g. paying staff, acquiring supplies. It is that agreement - not merely someone's 'say-so' - which I requested of which request Bissionnette studiously ignored. Complicating the issue was Deputy Justice Rosalind Conway's abject failure to insist that this Agreement be produced explaining why I referred her to the oversight powers concerned when she refused to recuse herself. In a courtroom, the litigants are seated before the judge enters to reflect fair play. When I turned up in the Feb. 27 hearing, Bissionnette was already seated and appeared to have been provided a private side-bar.

5) When Dixon requested a delay to file his argument, I acquiesced along with forwarding three pages sent to the ON Legal Society in December regarding B's alleged perfidy. No mention is made of that material in your defense. Why not?

6) Surely B. should be happy to produce the Partner's Agreement which is the focus of the action laid immediately after the Feb. 27 hearing against Dr. Vandewaetere (Dr. V.) CV 20 82993 . I cannot for the life of me see why Dixon would permit B. while he is under his own indictment in this affair, to ever claim to represent Dr. V. and the FCM staff.   Surely she should acquire her own legal representation. To date, I have no Defense from her.

ADDENDUM

7) Normally, I make a point by point rebuttal to factums which, for the reason noted above, I am not doing; merely highlighting a couple of points.

8) Of course if you get another 'Conway'; B. will walk in which my attention would be re-focused on Cavanagh LLP and the sitting judge as you note.

9) I am not interested in receiving money for my claim; I am interested in seeing B. charged criminally for fraud.

10) Point 10 is confusing as one and at the same time, B. portrayed the Feb. 27 hearing as a Mandamus Court and a Dispute Resolution Court which I was never asked to accede when it was first proposed. No matter, the Partners Agreement was at the centre of whichever interpretation was given to that court. It has never been made clear who requested that court in the first place moving everything 'sideways' from the SDC proper.

11)Point 16  I 'invited' B., considering his compromising actions, to consider dropping his representation, as I was willing to proceed against him. As written here, the factum reads like a direct threat. The point is that I would not pursue him legally if he had dropped out.

12) Point 17 requires explanation. Deputy Judge C. MacLeod (CV 20 83096) on his own action dropped two of my cases against Dr. J. (CV20 82659) and the General Hospital (CV 20 82847) regarding an alleged conspiracy. This was done on his own recognizance without a hearing thus turning the Justice System on its head. It explains why a copy of all my actions are forwarded to the Office of the P.M. 'Repository'. Similar to most other points, Dixon's account is most deficient on key matters. To 'show a reasonable cause of action' requires a hearing.

13) Section C 18 - 23 is pure bafflegab and does not deserve a response.

 

Signed this 17th day of April - 2020   Roger Callow  Plaintiff.

 

Request for scheduling application hearing on a regular motion day in Bissonnette v. Callow, Court file no. CV-20-849830  (NOV.30-2020 filing date)

Inbox

 

Kris Dixon(Cavanagh LLP for B. v CALLOW

Attachments10:53 (1 hour ago)

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/1/images/cleardot.gif

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/1/images/cleardot.gif

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/1/images/cleardot.gif

Good morning,

I am the lawyer for the applicant in the above referenced application. I attach here a copy of the notice of application.

This is an application for an order, inter alia, that the respondent is a “vexatious litigant” as that term is defined in accordance with section 140 of the Courts of Justice Act, RSO 1990, c. C43.

 Our client will be relying on Rules 14.05(2), 21 and 38 of the Rules of Civil Procedure, R.R.O. 1990, Reg. 194, and section 140(1) of the Courts of Justice Act, R.S.O. 1990, c C.4.

 We are seeking the following dates for a two hour hearing before a judge: (slated for Feb. 11-2021)

 I have emailed the self-represented respondent with these dates in an attempt to confer on the above proposed dates.

...The email indicated that the respondent was enclosing a copy of a letter to the Ottawa Court to advise it as to this availability. I have no further information in that regard.

 

I understand from the respondent that he prefers that the motion take place by teleconference. I inquired regarding Zoom etc., and the respondent’s ability and willingness to have the matter heard in that format. However, I did not receive specific comment on that inquiry.(Jan. 15-2021. Court is obfuscating my attempt to use the traditional  teleconferencing option) I prohibit the court from proceeding in my absence by teleconferencing due to the usual Registry screw-ups.

 

DEC. 01 Response from Roger Callow Respondent to Cavanagh LLP's (inaccurate account)

1) The above e-mail was received Dec. 01-2020

2) Enclosed here is a one-page letter to the ON legal Society dated Nov. 30 updated with this e-mail Dec. 01 with a copy to the Ottawa Courts (Nathalie Bondy Local Registrar)  which still refuses to communicate with me on other cases earlier listed on this matter.

 

Yours truly, Roger Callow

 

November 30-2020 (sent Nov. 30-2020)

TO: Ontario Law Society                                             FROM: Roger Callow - litigant in many cases

Osgoode Hall 130 Queen St. W.                                              #2001 - 1285 Cahill Dr. Ottawa, K1V  9A7

Toronto, ON M5H 2N6                            web: employeescasecanada.ca RECENT 7 nov. LEGAL MAIL

t. 416-947-3315 f. 416-947-5263 (blocked)                t. 613-521-1739

 

MESSAGE: 5 pages including this one

1) The key to the 3-page July 3-2020, letter to the Law Society regarding apparent fraud by two Ottawa lawyers - A. Bissonnette and K. Dixon - is that it goes without a response from the Law Society. Nor does the Society appear to read their legal mail in other submissions which I have made to them over a period of time.

2) Page 4 dated November 24-2020 in response to an action CV20-0084930 involving these two lawyers in a filing made by them could just as easily have been written as a Defense to my CV20 82993. Currently, I have called for a trusteeship to be invoked over the Ottawa courts due to their machinations including these two lawyers. The situation is just that bad.

3) In either case, this matter depends heavily on a detailed analysis of the alleged fraud which I have provided the ON Law Society on both lawyers. Without that investigation, Ontario is looking at yet another kangaroo court.

4) Regrettably, empty appeals to Deputy Minister, Chrystia Freeland as the 'last politician left standing' in this sorry affair leaves me appealing to our U.S. neighbors to intervene in Canadian matters as a protection against U.S. commercial interests.

5) It would seem that this letter is to be yet one more document if there is no proper response from the ON Legal Society in a Canadian Justice System which has gone bad.

 

Yours, in disappointment,  Roger Callow  Dec. 01-2020

 

LEGAL MAIL nov

 

NOV. 18

TO: Ontario Law Society                                      FROM: Roger Callow - litigant in many cases

Osgoode Hall 130 Queen St. W.                                                 #2001 - 1285 Cahill Dr. Ottawa, K1V  9A7

Toronto, ON M5H 2N6                     web: employeescasecanada.ca RECENT 7 nov. LEGAL MAIL

t. 416-947-3315 f. 416-947-5263 (blocked)             t. 613-521-1739

 

MESSAGE: 5 pages including this one

1) The key to the 3-page July 3-2020, letter to the Law Society regarding apparent fraud by two Ottawa lawyers - A. Bissonnette and K. Dixon - is that it goes without a response from the Law Society. Nor does the Society appear to read their legal mail in other submissions which I have made to them over a period of time.

2) Page 4 dated November 24-2020 in response to an action CV20-0084930 involving these two lawyers in a filing made by them could just as easily have been written as a Defense to my CV20 82993. Currently, I have called for a trusteeship to be invoked over the Ottawa courts due to their machinations including these two lawyers. The situation is just that bad.

3) In either case, this matter depends heavily on a detailed analysis of the alleged fraud which I have provided the ON Law Society on both lawyers. Without that investigation, Ontario is looking at yet another kangaroo court.

4) Regrettably, empty appeals to Deputy Minister, Chrystia Freeland as the 'last politician left standing' in this sorry affair leaves me appealing to our U.S. neighbors to intervene in Canadian matters as a protection against U.S. commercial interests.

5) It would seem that this letter is to be yet one more document if there is no proper response from the ON Legal Society in a Canadian Justice System which has gone bad.

 

Yours, in disappointment,  Roger Callow

OPEN LETTER TO ONTARIO LEGAL SOCIETY - July 03-2020 3 pages

web: employeescasecanada.ca LEGAL MAIL July  e-mail:rcallow770@gmail.com

BY: Roger Callow target of a 35 year Judicial scam involving a number of levels of the Canadian Judiciary. This unresolved labour case with its genesis in B.C. has been in all provinces except Nfld./ Labrador where it continues to fester taking down with it, the entire Canadian Judiciary.

QUOTES:

A) Power without wisdom is tyranny / Wisdom without power is meaningless.

B) Because civilization depends on continually making the effort, of never giving in. It needs be cared for by men of goodwill, protected from the dark. These people gave in. They stopped caring = barbarism for hundreds of years'. The Death of Scipio Iain Pears

C) Personal observation: Our P.M. is viewed by the world as a 'boy'. The media would like to place a political twist on this perception in order to justify elections with which the public have become disenchanted.

MESSAGE:

1) Enclosed is a 3-page letter to the ON Supreme Court CV20 82993 in responding to a fax dated July 03 from lawyer Alexander Bissonnette, (B) himself the target of a charge of fraud by me CV 20 82889 in information filed with the ON legal Society (The Society) as early as December 2019. There was no reply as is typical from The Society. My one-liner to B. was not to proceed before August as I anticipate collusion in a 'quick deed' from a compliant  Justice.

I have a number of these unsavoury type of actions already.

2) It is submitted here that if The Society were to take their responsibilities seriously, they would have seen fit to immediately suspend B until the matter of this alleged fraud was examined. Now there are additional charges to be made all of them pointing back to the failure of The Society to act.

3) Regrettably, the lawyer handling his case, Ken Dixon, of Cavanaugh LLP, is also subject to charges of fraud based on different criteria. Currently, the Ottawa Registry is hamstringing the registration of that case by mail. The PMO is kept notified of both cases as I believe sufficient evidence exists to impose a trusteeship over the entire Ottawa Court scene.

4) The crux of all the above cases focuses on disclosure which the Canadian Justice System routinely ignores at the expense of the weaker party. In this case, the suspension of my driver's license by run-away bureaucrat Deputy Ministry of Transport Medical, Franco Alulio without an explanation has created a cottage industry for organized crime. Due to Canada's silence, I have turned to U.S. Economics Professor Walter Williams whom has a column in the Ottawa Sun to speak out on a scourge which negatively impacts all car cultures. SEE web

5) A short history of disclosure (d) abuse follows from selected examples:

a) SNC Lavalin where former SC of Canada Justice, Frank Iacobucci retired to as an officer.

This disreputable firm continually escapes judicial overview by being permitted to hide d.

b) Vice Admiral Mark Norman where the crown was permitted to hide disclosure. 'You have been exonerated, Mr. Norman, you may go' from the presiding justice to a very surprised Norman whom was not exonerated, merely given a 'stay of proceedings'  but he was kept in the dark as to the conspiracy the previous day between the prosecutor, the judge and Marie Heinen, his own lawyer. Under those circumstances he was pressured into a buy-out with no chance of suing the government.

c) Huawei's Meng After 18 months of detention, B.C. Justice Heather Holmes did not call for d. which in all likelihood, would have revealed fraudulent means in arresting Meng making everything flowing from those charges 'null and void'. Meng would go back to China. The Court bluff in this case did not work as Meng was not a hapless individual; she has the full support of China behind her; something, obviously, the Canadian Justice System failed to take into account.

6) The Employee's Case deserves a special focus.

a) In 1985, when this senior teacher was laid off in West Vancouver for (bogus) economic reasons under the hastily imposed BILL 35 (1985) which parallels some of the thinking of the 'Carbon Tax'. The Employer refuses to recognize court oversight of such as the aberrant arbitration which the court later quashed ruling, in the process, the arbitrator to be patently unreasonable. No School Trustee took the stand to perjure themselves claiming a need to lay off staff. The arbitrator, believing he was looking at a 'sweetheart deal' (which he was until I replaced the union lawyer for the court appearances) converted 16 new hires to read 16 lay-offs with myself being the necessary 17th.There were in fact no lay-offs in June of 1985.

b) Under the Freedom of Information, I applied for Board meeting notes which I received in 2004 showing that only two out of the five (School Board Chairperson Margo Furk and her successor, Mike Smith) voted in favour of the resolution. Conspicuous by its absence was the material from a second sub rosa meeting held in July by Stuart Clyne outlined below.

c) When Stuart Clyne, School Board Counsel, saw that I was appealing the lay-off, he held a second private meeting with some of the School Board officials to redesign the lay-off notice for court purposes. That's fraud and it was revealed to Justice Mary Southin in 1986 when she called for all meeting notes but rather than charging Clyne with obvious fraud, she made a horrendous mistake which I have to live with to the current time. She returned the material 'because she did not use it' as a means of distancing the court in any re-hearing. Clyne used that short-coming to blackmail her to which she succumbed with every justice (over 50) since that time 'covering the cover-up' on a level never before seen in a democracy. When my appointed lawyer, Leo McGrady, saw where this was going, he dropped out, but rather than turning the file back to me as he should have done, he turned it back to the Union which has failed to share that information to date. If I had been given that d. we would not be here today and Clyne would most likely have ended up behind bars.

 

d) Premier Doug Ford inherited this file when he ascended to gov't. To this day, I have been refused a court hearing date for an examination of the above perfidy based on a d. request. If it is purely a B.C. matter, the court has the power to order the matter back to B.C. with instructions as to how they should proceed as opposed to relying on the old saw 'dismissed for being frivolous and vexatious. In short, they justify a judges right to, in effect, pick up the ball and go home' without delivering a Decision in an unresolved legal matter.

7) The repercussions from the Employee's Case are many and varied. For example, N.S. where the constitutional aspect of this case was mangled in 2018 has dropped their School Boards as has QC with other provinces to follow. The idea that a wingnut  School Board similar to West Vancouver could invoke a $20 million lawsuit has no appeal to other provinces. Teachers no longer trust to the authorities for good reason. I had one B.C. teacher inform me that he was laid off recently during COVID conditions. To be sure all such lay-offs are 'sweetheart based' with a client having to ask the permission of the Union to sue the Employer. Only if fraud can be shown can a suit be lodged which stands no chance in Canadian courts; I can vouch for that.

8) What can The Society do considering that they have remained mute on this topic since 2014? Perhaps place a padlock on their doors. At the very least suspend the two lawyers named above and support my petition for the Office of the PM to invoke a trusteeship over the Ottawa Courts.

 

Yours truly,

 

Roger Callow

 

cc  U.S. Professor Walter Williams

PMO Repository

 

P.S. At least you have saved me from the 'dreaded phone call' in which a female fronting for her male superior and having no understanding of the issues, gives a spiel which is later converted into self-serving documents for court which I will never see. That is why I reject outright such phone calls telling the other party that I only accept written comments.

I accused  young Dr. Jahagirdar (Dr. J.) of Towngate Family Clinic of being an inveterate liar. She was joined by the highly duplicitous Ottawa General Hospital's staff psychiatrist in early January, young Dr. Sarah Chan, to justify nefarious Hospital action at my expense. The College of Physicians and Surgeon's - Ethical Branch (CPSO)whitewashed the earlier complaint against Dr. J.ospitalHospitalHospital, Staff Staffss         but refuses to examine this second complaint which no doubt was behind Justice MacLeod's irresponsible decision to just drop my $10 million action against the Hospital on his own recognizance and without a trial. Master Kaufman on Mar 31, when the courts were closed, canceled my action CV 20 83096  on March 31 against MacLeod = court anarchy.

 

USEFUL IDIOTS

(recent 7 Nov. Subheading)

NEWSLETTER - NOV.24, 2020

POST IN STAFFROOM - e-mail colleagues

MESSAGE: sent to: Andrew Coyne (Globe& Mail) Mark Bonokoski / Tarek Fatah (Ottawa Sun) Kelly Egan (Ottawa Citizen) Ellie Tesher (The Star) J. Ivison / C. Selby (National Post) plus a separate account to  Deputy MInister Chrystia Freeland to either act or get out of politics

 

BY: Roger Callow  rcallow770@gmail.com  'KING OF THE WHISTLEBLOWERS' The 'squeaky wheel gets the grease and I have been squeaking for 35 years yet 'no grease'. Only in Canada, you say.... employeescasecanada.ca  2020 RECENT 7 nov  USEFUL IDIOTS sub-heading 

cc Walter E. Williams (U.S. Professor & Ottawa Sun columnist) / Deputy P.M. Chrystia Freeland should either act or get out of politics. As Trump does not see the threat to U.S. interests, perhaps Biden will.

Unresolved 35 year labour case before over 50 judges sees destruction of Cdn. Justice System due to systemic judicial malfeasance  The only answer is what one sees around the world...hit the streets but please, no violence to people. It is a waste of time voting under these circumstances in Canada: VOTERS: FOOLS VOTING FOR OTHER FOOLS .Preceding NEWSLETTERS detail different aspects of this legal debacle.(SEE web)

MESSAGE:

A) The colossal threat to any democracy that this case makes  goes unchallenged, whether it be by the politicians, institutions including the media, or individual Canadians in the teaching and legal professions reached across Canada with these newsletters. Canada is 'the little country who couldn't' because she lacks a backbone.

B) The thrust of this NEWSLETTER is to point out how one is not only deprived of his driving license but any connection with the legal profession on any other topic as well. The Sub-heading USEFUL IDIOTS refers to my Defence in CV20-00849830 against two lawyers I have accused of fraud. While the complete 6 page rebuttal plus some of my Exhibits appear on the web, the essence is described in Point 3) by the Applicant...

3) The current imbroglio in ON centres  on p 4 : In or about October 21, 2019, the Ministry of Transport ("the Ministry") sent a letter to Mr. Callow, advising him that it received information that he had cognitive and psychiatric (my underlining) conditions that impaired his ability to drive safely. The Ministry indicated that his driving privileges were suspended effective October 31, 2019 ("the driving suspension")

RESPONSE: a) The Ministry of Transport-Medical is a separate body from the Ministry of Transport drawing into question this entire factum as recent events in ON emanate from this action from which Deputy Minister of Transport-Medical, Franco Alulio, did not provide any source nor details regarding reasons for an ad hoc suspension. A $10 million action exists (included in this factum) against him to which he has not responded:CV20-82943 Nor has such as A.G. Doug Downey responded to a scam which has the potential to negatively impact drivers throughout North America. That latter case is why I have appealed to U.S. interests considering the lack of interest by Canadian institutions. Few drivers can live with a life-long suspension made under highly dubious circumstances.

b) The term 'psychiatric' is not used in the suspension forms and therefore cannot be tested. Further, my lawyer on other matters dropped out stating that no lawyer will represent me under these circumstances of 'psychiatric disorder'. He was right explaining why I am self representing in all legalities. It is a disaster without equal for any democracy and yet one the Canadian media will not expose.... It's a scam only Nazi Germany could have produced.

C) It is up to readers of this Newsletter to personally launch an Internet protest whatever form that may take. Don't merely ask others to do so.

 

 

NOV.02

WEB: employeescasecanada.ca  Nov.02 RECENT 7 nov. LEGAL MAIL  based on Oct. 7 letter to P.M. Trudeau which went without a response.

by: Roger Callow  rcallow770@gmail.com  (Ottawa)

 

TO: Prime Minister Justin Trudeau via fax: 613-941- 6900  1 page     

cc Itinerant Ottawa Sun writer U.S. Professor Walter E. Williams Economist

George Mason University (Economics) 4400 University Dr. Fairfax, VA 22030 

cc Cdn. media: 1) Sun media's L. Gunter columnist (works out of Edmonton and is failing to report on the civil class action against a number of judges who should have been charged criminally)  2) Ottawa Citizen's Kelly Egan whose failure to publish the rogue 'Franco Alulio' Deputy Minister of Transport-Medical fake driver license scam (traced back to Premier Ford and A.G. Doug Downey) has led to the collapse of Justice Canada in general and the Ottawa Courts specifically. 3) National Post's resourceful columnist John Ivison.

MESSAGE:

1) One might ask why further information on the 35 year unresolved Employee Case is being sent to a publicly challenged P.M. on the ground of ethics? One could equally ask the question of the career-challenged Minister of Justice, David Lametti (no doubt telling bureaucrats to do what they will but leave his name out of it) as to why no action against the courts has been taken.

2) With a media boycott of this national issue, the significance of this account is hence reduced to a test of their foolish boycott; foolish because a Canada wide revelation of the 'Franco Alulio' perfidy by me met with no response. Media credibility, therefore, is the focus now. Of course a copy goes to the U.S. representative, W.E. Williams.

3) In brief, the problem goes well beyond the chronic one of a lack of disclosure as it hits at the very basis of judicial malfeasance. For example, anyone googling my name (these spots can be bought) would find a 2014 Decision by Ottawa's Justice Colin MacKinnon against me for the traditional frivolous& vexatious put-down forever leaving the impression that this filed case was the 'last word' on my court challenge. What it doesn't tell you is that there were three different Orders on the same event from Mckinnon j., none of which recognized the existence of the other. Which one was filed? Does it make any difference anyway as a Decision can be quietly removed later so that no precedent exists? I have experienced variations on this theme in courts right across Canada naming judges and lawyers in actions for malfeasance.

4) By tradition, the media has a knee jerk reaction to protecting  our hallowed institutions although it has been noticed of late that this protection is eroding. Unlike the U.S. no Canadian judge has ever been sent to prison which should be, but is not, a plus in our favour. The essence of the Employee's Case is that the house of justice is a deck of cards. I call it 'moral covid' which has the potential to be more devastating than the literal kind; the latter will end some day, the former not so easy. The 'individual' in our society has been expunged.

5) ACTIONS TO BE TAKEN? You have got me; all individuals and institutions in Canada with oversight functions 'have been tried and found wanting'. Canadians have a 'legal system' not a 'justice system'.

 

Yours, in dismay, Roger Callow The Outlawed Canadian in an outlaw Justice System due to judicial malfeasance.

 

POST IN STAFFROOM - e-mail colleagues

 

LEGAL MAIL nov

 

NOV. 18

TO: Ontario Law Society                                      FROM: Roger Callow - litigant in many cases

Osgoode Hall 130 Queen St. W.                                                 #2001 - 1285 Cahill Dr. Ottawa, K1V  9A7

Toronto, ON M5H 2N6                     web: employeescasecanada.ca RECENT 7 nov. LEGAL MAIL

t. 416-947-3315 f. 416-947-5263 (blocked)             t. 613-521-1739

 

MESSAGE: 5 pages including this one

1) The key to the 3-page July 3-2020, letter to the Law Society regarding apparent fraud by two Ottawa lawyers - A. Bissonnette and K. Dixon - is that it goes without a response from the Law Society. Nor does the Society appear to read their legal mail in other submissions which I have made to them over a period of time.

2) Page 4 dated November 24-2020 in response to an action CV20-0084930 involving these two lawyers in a filing made by them could just as easily have been written as a Defense to my CV20 82993. Currently, I have called for a trusteeship to be invoked over the Ottawa courts due to their machinations including these two lawyers. The situation is just that bad.

3) In either case, this matter depends heavily on a detailed analysis of the alleged fraud which I have provided the ON Law Society on both lawyers. Without that investigation, Ontario is looking at yet another kangaroo court.

4) Regrettably, empty appeals to Deputy Minister, Chrystia Freeland as the 'last politician left standing' in this sorry affair leaves me appealing to our U.S. neighbors to intervene in Canadian matters as a protection against U.S. commercial interests.

5) It would seem that this letter is to be yet one more document if there is no proper response from the ON Legal Society in a Canadian Justice System which has gone bad.

 

Yours, in disappointment,  Roger Callow

OPEN LETTER TO ONTARIO LEGAL SOCIETY - July 03-2020 3 pages

web: employeescasecanada.ca LEGAL MAIL July  e-mail:rcallow770@gmail.com

BY: Roger Callow target of a 35 year Judicial scam involving a number of levels of the Canadian Judiciary. This unresolved labour case with its genesis in B.C. has been in all provinces except Nfld./ Labrador where it continues to fester taking down with it, the entire Canadian Judiciary.

QUOTES:

A) Power without wisdom is tyranny / Wisdom without power is meaningless.

B) Because civilization depends on continually making the effort, of never giving in. It needs be cared for by men of goodwill, protected from the dark. These people gave in. They stopped caring = barbarism for hundreds of years'. The Death of Scipio Iain Pears

C) Personal observation: Our P.M. is viewed by the world as a 'boy'. The media would like to place a political twist on this perception in order to justify elections with which the public have become disenchanted.

MESSAGE:

1) Enclosed is a 3-page letter to the ON Supreme Court CV20 82993 in responding to a fax dated July 03 from lawyer Alexander Bissonnette, (B) himself the target of a charge of fraud by me CV 20 82889 in information filed with the ON legal Society (The Society) as early as December 2019. There was no reply as is typical from The Society. My one-liner to B. was not to proceed before August as I anticipate collusion in a 'quick deed' from a compliant  Justice.

I have a number of these unsavoury type of actions already.

2) It is submitted here that if The Society were to take their responsibilities seriously, they would have seen fit to immediately suspend B until the matter of this alleged fraud was examined. Now there are additional charges to be made all of them pointing back to the failure of The Society to act.

3) Regrettably, the lawyer handling his case, Ken Dixon, of Cavanaugh LLP, is also subject to charges of fraud based on different criteria. Currently, the Ottawa Registry is hamstringing the registration of that case by mail. The PMO is kept notified of both cases as I believe sufficient evidence exists to impose a trusteeship over the entire Ottawa Court scene.

4) The crux of all the above cases focuses on disclosure which the Canadian Justice System routinely ignores at the expense of the weaker party. In this case, the suspension of my driver's license by run-away bureaucrat Deputy Ministry of Transport Medical, Franco Alulio without an explanation has created a cottage industry for organized crime. Due to Canada's silence, I have turned to U.S. Economics Professor Walter Williams whom has a column in the Ottawa Sun to speak out on a scourge which negatively impacts all car cultures. SEE web

5) A short history of disclosure (d) abuse follows from selected examples:

a) SNC Lavalin where former SC of Canada Justice, Frank Iacobucci retired to as an officer.

This disreputable firm continually escapes judicial overview by being permitted to hide d.

b) Vice Admiral Mark Norman where the crown was permitted to hide disclosure. 'You have been exonerated, Mr. Norman, you may go' from the presiding justice to a very surprised Norman whom was not exonerated, merely given a 'stay of proceedings'  but he was kept in the dark as to the conspiracy the previous day between the prosecutor, the judge and Marie Heinen, his own lawyer. Under those circumstances he was pressured into a buy-out with no chance of suing the government.

c) Huawei's Meng After 18 months of detention, B.C. Justice Heather Holmes did not call for d. which in all likelihood, would have revealed fraudulent means in arresting Meng making everything flowing from those charges 'null and void'. Meng would go back to China. The Court bluff in this case did not work as Meng was not a hapless individual; she has the full support of China behind her; something, obviously, the Canadian Justice System failed to take into account.

6) The Employee's Case deserves a special focus.

a) In 1985, when this senior teacher was laid off in West Vancouver for (bogus) economic reasons under the hastily imposed BILL 35 (1985) which parallels some of the thinking of the 'Carbon Tax'. The Employer refuses to recognize court oversight of such as the aberrant arbitration which the court later quashed ruling, in the process, the arbitrator to be patently unreasonable. No School Trustee took the stand to perjure themselves claiming a need to lay off staff. The arbitrator, believing he was looking at a 'sweetheart deal' (which he was until I replaced the union lawyer for the court appearances) converted 16 new hires to read 16 lay-offs with myself being the necessary 17th.There were in fact no lay-offs in June of 1985.

b) Under the Freedom of Information, I applied for Board meeting notes which I received in 2004 showing that only two out of the five (School Board Chairperson Margo Furk and her successor, Mike Smith) voted in favour of the resolution. Conspicuous by its absence was the material from a second sub rosa meeting held in July by Stuart Clyne outlined below.

c) When Stuart Clyne, School Board Counsel, saw that I was appealing the lay-off, he held a second private meeting with some of the School Board officials to redesign the lay-off notice for court purposes. That's fraud and it was revealed to Justice Mary Southin in 1986 when she called for all meeting notes but rather than charging Clyne with obvious fraud, she made a horrendous mistake which I have to live with to the current time. She returned the material 'because she did not use it' as a means of distancing the court in any re-hearing. Clyne used that short-coming to blackmail her to which she succumbed with every justice (over 50) since that time 'covering the cover-up' on a level never before seen in a democracy. When my appointed lawyer, Leo McGrady, saw where this was going, he dropped out, but rather than turning the file back to me as he should have done, he turned it back to the Union which has failed to share that information to date. If I had been given that d. we would not be here today and Clyne would most likely have ended up behind bars.

d) Premier Doug Ford inherited this file when he ascended to gov't. To this day, I have been refused a court hearing date for an examination of the above perfidy based on a d. request. If it is purely a B.C. matter, the court has the power to order the matter back to B.C. with instructions as to how they should proceed as opposed to relying on the old saw 'dismissed for being frivolous and vexatious. In short, they justify a judges right to, in effect, pick up the ball and go home' without delivering a Decision in an unresolved legal matter.

7) The repercussions from the Employee's Case are many and varied. For example, N.S. where the constitutional aspect of this case was mangled in 2018 has dropped their School Boards as has QC with other provinces to follow. The idea that a wingnut  School Board similar to West Vancouver could invoke a $20 million lawsuit has no appeal to other provinces. Teachers no longer trust to the authorities for good reason. I had one B.C. teacher inform me that he was laid off recently during COVID conditions. To be sure all such lay-offs are 'sweetheart based' with a client having to ask the permission of the Union to sue the Employer. Only if fraud can be shown can a suit be lodged which stands no chance in Canadian courts; I can vouch for that.

8) What can The Society do considering that they have remained mute on this topic since 2014? Perhaps place a padlock on their doors. At the very least suspend the two lawyers named above and support my petition for the Office of the PM to invoke a trusteeship over the Ottawa Courts.

 

Yours truly,

 

Roger Callow

 

cc  U.S. Professor Walter Williams

PMO Repository

 

P.S. At least you have saved me from the 'dreaded phone call' in which a female fronting for her male superior and having no understanding of the issues, gives a spiel which is later converted into self-serving documents for court which I will never see. That is why I reject outright such phone calls telling the other party that I only accept written comments.

I accused  young Dr. Jahagirdar (Dr. J.) of Towngate Family Clinic of being an inveterate liar. She was joined by the highly duplicitous Ottawa General Hospital's staff psychiatrist in early January, young Dr. Sarah Chan, to justify nefarious Hospital action at my expense. The College of Physicians and Surgeon's - Ethical Branch (CPSO)whitewashed the earlier complaint against Dr. J.ospitalHospitalHospital, Staff Staffss         but refuses to examine this second complaint which no doubt was behind Justice MacLeod's irresponsible decision to just drop my $10 million action against the Hospital on his own recognizance and without a trial. Master Kaufman on Mar 31, when the courts were closed, canceled my action CV 20 83096  on March 31 against MacLeod = court anarchy.

 

USEFUL IDIOTS

(recent 7 Nov. Subheading)

NEWSLETTER - NOV.24, 2020

POST IN STAFFROOM - e-mail colleagues

MESSAGE: sent to: Andrew Coyne (Globe& Mail) Mark Bonokoski / Tarek Fatah (Ottawa Sun) Kelly Egan (Ottawa Citizen) Ellie Tesher (The Star) J. Ivison / C. Selby (National Post) plus a separate account to  Deputy MInister Chrystia Freeland to either act or get out of politics

 

BY: Roger Callow  rcallow770@gmail.com  'KING OF THE WHISTLEBLOWERS' The 'squeaky wheel gets the grease and I have been squeaking for 35 years yet 'no grease'. Only in Canada, you say.... employeescasecanada.ca  2020 RECENT 7 nov  USEFUL IDIOTS sub-heading 

cc Walter E. Williams (U.S. Professor & Ottawa Sun columnist) / Deputy P.M. Chrystia Freeland should either act or get out of politics. As Trump does not see the threat to U.S. interests, perhaps Biden will.

Unresolved 35 year labour case before over 50 judges sees destruction of Cdn. Justice System due to systemic judicial malfeasance  The only answer is what one sees around the world...hit the streets but please, no violence to people. It is a waste of time voting under these circumstances in Canada: VOTERS: FOOLS VOTING FOR OTHER FOOLS .Preceding NEWSLETTERS detail different aspects of this legal debacle.(SEE web)

MESSAGE:

A) The colossal threat to any democracy that this case makes  goes unchallenged, whether it be by the politicians, institutions including the media, or individual Canadians in the teaching and legal professions reached across Canada with these newsletters. Canada is 'the little country who couldn't' because she lacks a backbone.

B) The thrust of this NEWSLETTER is to point out how one is not only deprived of his driving license but any connection with the legal profession on any other topic as well. The Sub-heading USEFUL IDIOTS refers to my Defence in CV20-00849830 against two lawyers I have accused of fraud. While the complete 6 page rebuttal plus some of my Exhibits appear on the web, the essence is described in Point 3) by the Applicant...

3) The current imbroglio in ON centres  on p 4 : In or about October 21, 2019, the Ministry of Transport ("the Ministry") sent a letter to Mr. Callow, advising him that it received information that he had cognitive and psychiatric (my underlining) conditions that impaired his ability to drive safely. The Ministry indicated that his driving privileges were suspended effective October 31, 2019 ("the driving suspension")

RESPONSE: a) The Ministry of Transport-Medical is a separate body from the Ministry of Transport drawing into question this entire factum as recent events in ON emanate from this action from which Deputy Minister of Transport-Medical, Franco Alulio, did not provide any source nor details regarding reasons for an ad hoc suspension. A $10 million action exists (included in this factum) against him to which he has not responded:CV20-82943 Nor has such as A.G. Doug Downey responded to a scam which has the potential to negatively impact drivers throughout North America. That latter case is why I have appealed to U.S. interests considering the lack of interest by Canadian institutions. Few drivers can live with a life-long suspension made under highly dubious circumstances.

b) The term 'psychiatric' is not used in the suspension forms and therefore cannot be tested. Further, my lawyer on other matters dropped out stating that no lawyer will represent me under these circumstances of 'psychiatric disorder'. He was right explaining why I am self representing in all legalities. It is a disaster without equal for any democracy and yet one the Canadian media will not expose.... It's a scam only Nazi Germany could have produced.

C) It is up to readers of this Newsletter to personally launch an Internet protest whatever form that may take. Don't merely ask others to do so.

 

 

NOV.02

WEB: employeescasecanada.ca  Nov.02 RECENT 7 nov. LEGAL MAIL  based on Oct. 7 letter to P.M. Trudeau which went without a response.

by: Roger Callow  rcallow770@gmail.com  (Ottawa)

 

TO: Prime Minister Justin Trudeau via fax: 613-941- 6900  1 page     

cc Itinerant Ottawa Sun writer U.S. Professor Walter E. Williams Economist

George Mason University (Economics) 4400 University Dr. Fairfax, VA 22030 

cc Cdn. media: 1) Sun media's L. Gunter columnist (works out of Edmonton and is failing to report on the civil class action against a number of judges who should have been charged criminally)  2) Ottawa Citizen's Kelly Egan whose failure to publish the rogue 'Franco Alulio' Deputy Minister of Transport-Medical fake driver license scam (traced back to Premier Ford and A.G. Doug Downey) has led to the collapse of Justice Canada in general and the Ottawa Courts specifically. 3) National Post's resourceful columnist John Ivison.

MESSAGE:

1) One might ask why further information on the 35 year unresolved Employee Case is being sent to a publicly challenged P.M. on the ground of ethics? One could equally ask the question of the career-challenged Minister of Justice, David Lametti (no doubt telling bureaucrats to do what they will but leave his name out of it) as to why no action against the courts has been taken.

2) With a media boycott of this national issue, the significance of this account is hence reduced to a test of their foolish boycott; foolish because a Canada wide revelation of the 'Franco Alulio' perfidy by me met with no response. Media credibility, therefore, is the focus now. Of course a copy goes to the U.S. representative, W.E. Williams.

3) In brief, the problem goes well beyond the chronic one of a lack of disclosure as it hits at the very basis of judicial malfeasance. For example, anyone googling my name (these spots can be bought) would find a 2014 Decision by Ottawa's Justice Colin MacKinnon against me for the traditional frivolous& vexatious put-down forever leaving the impression that this filed case was the 'last word' on my court challenge. What it doesn't tell you is that there were three different Orders on the same event from Mckinnon j., none of which recognized the existence of the other. Which one was filed? Does it make any difference anyway as a Decision can be quietly removed later so that no precedent exists? I have experienced variations on this theme in courts right across Canada naming judges and lawyers in actions for malfeasance.

4) By tradition, the media has a knee jerk reaction to protecting  our hallowed institutions although it has been noticed of late that this protection is eroding. Unlike the U.S. no Canadian judge has ever been sent to prison which should be, but is not, a plus in our favour. The essence of the Employee's Case is that the house of justice is a deck of cards. I call it 'moral covid' which has the potential to be more devastating than the literal kind; the latter will end some day, the former not so easy. The 'individual' in our society has been expunged.

5) ACTIONS TO BE TAKEN? You have got me; all individuals and institutions in Canada with oversight functions 'have been tried and found wanting'. Canadians have a 'legal system' not a 'justice system'.

 

Yours, in dismay, Roger Callow The Outlawed Canadian in an outlaw Justice System due to judicial malfeasance.

 

POST IN STAFFROOM - e-mail colleagues