MEDIA feb-2021

 

FEB. 26

rogercallow.com MEDIA feb. (26)

TO: Mann Lawyers LLP                                        FROM: Roger Callow self-represented

27 Foster St.            Perth, ON  K7H 1R5                        #2001 - 1285 Cahiil Drive Ottawa K1V 9A7 

f. 613-264-0789  6 pges. sent by fax                          t/f. 613-521-1739  rcallow770@ gmail.com

 

TOPIC: Bissionnette v. Callow H.D. April 08-2021  CV20-849830 NOT  CV20-84983

 

MESSAGE:

1) I sent a copy of the included Form 23A to Cavanagh LLP on Feb. 23-2021 and have yet to hear back.

2) Should Ottawa Justice Pierre Roger decide to drop this matter, he has until March 15 to do so thus completing all contention between the two parties. As I have no way of communicating with Roger j. due to Ottawa Court obfuscation, I must depend on Cavanagh LLP to deliver my messages. All material goes to Deputy Minister, Chrystia Freeland to act in the absence of many government institutions. She is aware of my call requesting that the Ottawa Courts be placed under a Trusteeship although whom would do that would require, it seems, a government BILL.

3) In the  event Roger j decides to continue with this action after March 15,2021, then a number of conditions come into play:

a) Why did Roger j. permit the Applicant here to usurp my earlier laid Action CV20-84943 considering his interim notes at a Feb. 11 vertical hearing which was fraught with technical glitches? I was not contacted despite claims to the contrary. A new date of April 08 was set.

b) The 'Franco Alulio algorithm' (detailed in the enclosures) deprives me of a legal Identity in any legal matter. Before I attend any court, my status must be cleared up. That may require a government Bill. Until that time, a copy of this letter goes to the Governor General to be 'a friend of Roger Callow' in any legal proceedings in the interim. Hence Cavanagh LLP should include enclosures to me to this body as well.

c) Earlier in a settlement court (19-SDC-155235 Deputy Justice Rosalind Conway j.) called by Bissionnette without my knowledge or consent, I submit he lied about sending the police on a wellness check in which the police said he did. Conway j. was not interested in that piece of prevarication nor the issues before her so I requested her recusal which she refused. That material exists under the current Applicant's claim hence it now becomes a matter of sworn testimony and Bissionnette may be held liable accordingly in a court of law.

d) In the event the April 08 Hearing proceeds, I ask for Roger j. to put together a compendium of written questions to be asked of both Parties to respond in writing as much material exists on this topic considering the Applicant asks for a consideration 'of all issues' without detailing one. Again, one would think any Justice so appointed would raise that question in the February 11 2021 which Rogers apparently didn't.

e) Again, if the April 08 Hearing proceeds, a proper legal Decision must be made as to whether to continue under CV20-849830 under which the action was laid or a bastardized version perverted by the Ottawa Court Registry: CV20-84983, as the outcome could easily be contested by either Party on those grounds alone. Again, a government Bill may be necessary to that effect as I doubt no law exists on this matter. Just rolling actions together by the court as is customary is not available here for a number of reasons.

f) Should Mann Lawyers wish to continue with the April 08 H.D. then I submit that they must get new representation as I have filed fraud charges with the ON Legal Society (which does not respond to its legal mail) for their representative, Ken Dixon, for clandestinely making arrangements with Master Kaufmann from the A.G. Department who obtained a File No. from the Ottawa Court during lockdown in March of 2020 and wrote a Decision without my knowledge and certainly without my consent.

SUGGESTED ACTION

4) Put an end to this nonsense, and drop your case unless you are very serious. In that event, lay a new properly written charge and request that Roger j. not be the sitting judge.

5) Should Roger j. 'march to his own drummer', (see accompanying material)  by continuing after March 15, 2021,expect my resistance to take at least two years depending on the outcome prolonging this matter, possibly forever.

 

Yours truly, Roger Callow

cc Chrystia Freeland

cc Governor General

 

FEB. 18

Feb. 18-2021

TO: Arts and Letters Club                         FROM: Roger Callow  plaintiff in many actions

14 Elm St. Toronto ON M5G 1G7                      1285 Cahill Dr. #2001 Ottawa, ON K1V 9A7

TOPIC: death of cartoonist &                              employeescase canada.ca to Dec. 31-2020

A & L Member, Alan King                         rogercallow.com from Jan.01-2021 onward

To whom it may concern:                                   e-mail: thecallows@gmail.com

 

MESSAGE: rogercallow.com FEBRUARY 18-2021 entry

1)... B) Recent death of former O.C. editorial cartoonist, Alan King (given the ax in 1997 under Conrad Black control) with an I.Q. of 143 (about the level of my deceased sister) is characterized by this statement: Attempts at rational debate are regarded as mutinous insolence,” King wrote, “and deviations from the ideological line of the editorial board as evidence of mental deficiency.” Note the mental assignation in this boilerplate criticism for dissident employees ...been there, done that.... I took night school lessons on cartooning but lacked the talent. As to I.Q., I have the high school marks to show that I was no genius but with that much said, the whole I.Q. business is a 'ball of wax' taken in our younger years and denote people able to give the authorities what they are looking for (in essence they understand conformity), as I am sure King would agree. Slavish obeisance to the 'isms' may get you good marks and a top job based on prevarication capabilities, but it does not say much about 'quality of life'. (Most truly top talented individuals seek to keep themselves hidden.) When you do what I am doing, you have to keep yourself on top publicly to survive.

2) As a retired high school teacher (79), I have always viewed the historical process as one describing the past in the context of the past to the present in terms of the present culture. I would have appeared to get my 'just desert' on that accord for being the only Cdn. senior teacher laid off in 1985 in West Vancouver, B.C. and not receive any compensation in a marathon unresolved trial lasting 35 years. That story is outlined on my blogs.

3) I notice that A & L has a Facebook presence making it a dinosaur Organization in terms of the young 'woke' generation. To prove that you are not 'dead from the neck up'; what is your Organization's response to the Franco Alulio algorithm? SEE Roger Callow.com Sub-heading: EUGENICS-PSYCHIATRY-EMPLOYEES CASE.

 

THE THREAT  This passage is repeated from Jan. 15-2021 Newsletter in which Alulio replaced cognitive disorder (for reasons best known to himself) with psychiatric disorder. The former can be re-tested; not so the latter. Nor do we know which authority he was acting on as he does not respond to a $10 million Action.

 It's the algorithm, stupid, not the people. Canadians are so caught up with the conspiracy against Roger Callow, that they do not perceive the real threat; namely, the algorithm which Franco Alulio, Deputy Minister of Transport-Medical in Ontario set up by which a targeted individual such as myself can be deprived of all legal representation for any matter due to his bogus driver license suspension. Hence removal of anyone in any form such as a trial associated with this stunt; namely, Alulio, myself, the judges, the 'Bobbsey Twin' lawyers with the last act slated for Feb. 11-2021 where I am the Respondent, or other conspirators is immaterial. The only way to defeat this algorithm is 1)expose the perfidy of Alulio publicly and 2)charge him criminally with a 20 year sentence held over his head. Otherwise, COVID 19 will look like child's play if this algorithm grows beyond Alulio. Time is running out fast. The U.S., in the absence of Canadians, are you listening?  'Canada has a Legal System; not a Justice System' explaining why I have requested the U.S. Embassy (Ottawa) to be a 'friend of Roger Callow' and attend the Feb. 11 hearing.... All N. American drivers are targets of this potential 'Organized Crime' Nazi-like cottage industry.

 

4) As an activist I believe that when one door closes, another door opens leaving the question as to which door and the nature of that door? What is the A & S Society prepared to do in a forward looking issue?

5) No other institution has responded to any of my enquiries; I call it Institutional Autism where institutions speak only to other institutions with the individual being left out. Alan King would have understood.

 

Yours truly, Roger Callow Amour de Cosmos but not Canada.

 

cc President & CEO of CAA North & Eastern Ontario for a personal only response.

 

FEB. 15

FEBRUARY, 2021  MEDIA  FEBRUARY  5 pages

 

(JANUARY 23-2021) (by letter mail)  2 pages (N.B. FEB.12-2021 plus 2 page Roger j. critique - included elsewhere on the website- plus 3 page request focusing on a need for a new Justice)

 

TO: Interim GG SCofC Chief Justice Richard Wagner / Rideau Hall / 1 Sussex Dr. Ott.K1A 0A1

FROM: Roger Callow Plaintiff 1285 Cahill Dr. #2001 Ottawa K1V 9A7 t: 613-521-1739

websites: employeescasecanada.ca to 2020. rogercallow.com MEDIA  JANUARY 23-2021

 

REFERENCE: CV20-849830 Bissonnette esq. v Callow H.D. February 11-2021

BACKGROUND

1) The last time I saw you was going 'puff, puff' outside the SCofC Registry - great security.

2) For legal reasons; I cannot comment on the dismissal of the former GG due to reasons of employee dissatisfaction other than what I read in the newspaper. On the other hand I can comment on her job performance - or lack thereto - as it relates to conducting her role as GG in the matter of the Employee's Case which I label 'incompetent'. She appears to have no idea as to the notion of 'we, the people', when fundamental institutions break down as is the case here. Below is one such excerpt to her:

MESSAGE: (JUNE 30-2019)

(1) 'Registry Tail wags Canadian Judicial Dog' best describes the still unchallenged request that Registry clerks in B.C. and ON (over one year!) have not been challenged by you over this serious deviation.

(2) Civil Cases were also laid in mid-June against the B.C. Teachers Union in PEI and against both the Employer and Union in MB. For the sake of brevity, I include the web sites here for your reference: employeescasecanada.ca 2019 JUNE sub-headings for PEI, MB and NB.

(3) Number  3) in the June letter in N.B. is very serious indeed and warrants you calling for a judicial enquiry immediately as all Canadian judicial credibility is suspended until that matter is investigated. Failing that challenge and you might just as well telephone President Trump telling him to 'send in the Marines' as this story has international ramifications.

Yours truly  (Roger Callow)

 

THE PRESENT

3) Due to court shenanigans, I appealed to the U.S. Embassy to ensure my court rights on Feb. 11-2021 as Respondent by becoming 'a friend of Roger Callow'. The U.S. is inextricably involved due to the fake Franco Alulio algorithm of Oct. 2019 (SEE enclosed material) which targets the driving public. For example, a target may not get any legal representation in any legal matter which is more than unconscionable. I call it treason.

4) With the removal of GG Payette, I was hoping to replace her with the new GG to oversee protection of my legal rights on Feb. 11-2021 as the U.S. should not feel obligated to act in this 'Canadian matter' despite having U.S. repercussions as diplomatic and commercial concerns between the two countries utilize courts in both countries.

5) To say that I was flummoxed by your interim appointment is to under-estimate my reaction as your conduct in QC and the SCof C with my fourth and last approach in my unresolved labour case where no compensation has been paid was reprehensible. I questioned elsewhere your appointment to the SCofC. Certainly you should never have been appointed Chief Justice.

6) In Gatineau, the presiding judge never wrote a Decision. A Chief Justice did, making no mention of the existence of a different judge conducting the trial. On appeal, extensive interference from Lavery de Billy into the courts was labeled by me as 'Lavery de Billy tail wags QC judicial dog'. That was the background to my fourth and last SCofC appeal stage managered by a judge already in the throes of retirement with you and one other fulfilling the triumvirate.

7) I suggest that the above information compromises your ability to act as 'a friend of Roger Callow' but due to the immediacy of the upcoming case, I am retaining my connection to the U.S. Embassy considering that the Canadian Media is AWOL on the single most important issue in Canadian history. Deputy P.M. Chrystia Freeland representing all politicians has shown how inept she is in dealing with Judicial malfeasance in Canada.

 

ACTION TO BE TAKEN

8) You got me as I have tried everything unsuccessfully over the past 35 years. As of Dec. 31-2020, I claim the Employer won (on behalf of all Employers wishing to avoid paying employee compensation), I lost (on behalf of all employees so targeted) and 37 million Canadians lost their Justice System. Quite a record and nothing to be proud about. I do the best I can with what I have which, in Canada, has no meaning as 'individual rights' have been suborned in our society by the bully boys; the Employee's Case merely leading the way. I call it Institutional Autism where institutions speak only to other institutions. In bottom line language: 'We are 'the little country which couldn't...' or, to be more specific:

POGO: WE HAVE SEEN THE ENEMY & HE IS THE CANADIAN JUSTICE SYSTEM

 

Yours truly, (Roger Callow)

cc Media (Gang of 7) / U.S. Embassy (Ottawa) / Chrystia Freeland

 

THE THREAT  (Due to its significance, this passage is repeated from Jan. 15-2021 Newsletter:

 It's the algorithm, stupid, not the people. Canadians are so caught up with the conspiracy against Roger Callow, that they do not perceive the real threat; namely, the algorithm which Franco Alulio, Deputy Minister of Transport-Medical in Ontario set up by which a targeted individual such as myself can be deprived of all legal representation for any matter due to his bogus driver license suspension. Hence removal of anyone in any form such as a trial associated with this stunt; namely, Alulio, myself, the judges, the 'Bobbsey Twin' lawyers with the last act slated for Feb. 11-2021 where I am the Respondent, or other conspirators is immaterial. The only way to defeat this algorithm is 1)expose the perfidy of Alulio publicly and 2)charge him criminally with a 20 year sentence held over his head. Otherwise, COVID 19 will look like child's play if this algorithm grows beyond Alulio. Time is running out fast. The U.S., in the absence of Canadians, are you listening?  'Canada has a Legal System; not a Justice System' explaining why I have requested the U.S. Embassy (Ottawa) to be a 'friend of Roger Callow' and attend the Feb. 11 hearing which I hope to attend by teleconferencing and in which I have used successfully in the past. The interim GG appointed is already compromised as illustrated above.

 

FEBRUARY 15- 2021  (REFERENCE: CV20-849830)  MEDIA  (FEBRUARY 15)

TO: interim or new GG of Canada  FROM: Roger Callow ,Canadian born citizen without the basic rights accorded to every other citizen in Canada.

1) This letter to the Governor General follows on one dated January 23-2021 to the interim GG. The focus of this letter relates to conditions laid down by Pierre Roger j. in the February 11 meeting which I did not attend vertically due to technical reasons. A two page annotated interpretation of Roger j.'s restrictions by me appears on rogercallow.com MEDIA feb. 12.

2) The importance of the Applicant's factum is to request 'a discussion of all issues'; something which I have challenged to date on an either/or basis of the court; namely, to dismiss the action 'for not making a case as being too broad' as all issues date back to the legitimacy of a senior teacher lay-off in B.C. in 1985 where no judgment has ever been given before over 50 judges across Canada for without that, the Employer understandably refuses to pay compensation on any level. Technically, this writer is still an employee of the West Vancouver School Board albeit an unpaid one. Attempts to reconcile the matter out of court at the time of the successful B.C. Supreme Court action to quash the arbitration were unsuccessful. Currently, the cost of outside settlement by me has been set at $20 million, a 40X increase over my original offer rejected by the School District in 1987.

3) Having been thwarted by the authorities in the Judiciary, government, and Union as well as the Employer; I threw in the towel on Dec. 31,2020 declaring my 35 year protest at an end as I didn't want defiance to become personal denial. Further, the Ottawa Courts refused my filed actions for any hearing time and yet found cause to grant the Applicant the above hearing date where they restructured my case in which I am the 'frivolous and vexatious' Respondent. It is a repeat of the same stunt pulled in 2014 in which Justice C. McKinnon filed three separate Decisions on the same case, none of which recognized the existence of the other two. (Would the real Justice McKinnon please stand up? ) The oversight body (Canadian Judicial Council failed to even acknowledge this complaint.

4) I provided Pierre Roger j. with an either/or written proposition which I am prepared to honour until March 15-2021 and send him a copy to confirm my unprejudiced offer which it now becomes considering his questionable court restrictions. That offer consists of disposing of this case in its entirety in the terms mentioned above or, alternatively, let 'leash the dogs of war, and indeed, examine all issues dating from my illicit senior teacher lay-off for economic reasons. If he does not act by March 15; I will presume that he plans to take the longer route.

An addendum is attached as to those issues to be resolved

5) As a personal observation, I do not believe that Roger j. has any intention of going beyond those issues which support the government conspiracy particularly matters surrounding his old cohort as an A.G. Master; namely, A.G. Master Kaufmann. As such, it is not an 'all or nothing' approach as asserted by the Applicants. Already, I have found sufficient fault with the assertions of Roger j. to call for his recusal. Should he decline, as noted in the two page analysis of his 'restrictions'; I will appeal directly to you as Governor General to remove him from all judicial functions. A copy of this letter goes to Deputy Minister Chrystia Freeland, SUN media's Lorne Gunter, U.S. Embassy(Ottawa) & U.S. Professor VDH Hanson (an itinerant SUN columnist) due to the clear and present danger of the Franco Alulio algorithm.  Roger Callow (signed)

 

ADDENDUM:

6) The first action for Roger j. to take is to assign me back to salary (I was inexplicitly cut on November 4,1985 for unexplained reasons) with all back pay plus interest which should leave some niveaux rich West Vancouver taxpayers taking out a third mortgage.) Of course, I have to be willing to return to the classroom to collect which, considering the time difference, I could possibly do inside of the following day. At 79, I would be the oldest full time teacher in a classroom in Canada. I would look eagerly to giving my students an 'education' which everyone is for...until it is explained to them. As background, I have stories galore which should appeal to fun-loving students who know exactly what to say at the dinner table to put the 'sizzle' in the steak...Do you know what Mr. Callow said today?...What did that pinko communist say this time!!  Believe me, students would love my stories which, if the Superintendent was correct in 1985 as to why no parent ever complained directly to me because...'They are all afraid of you'. For the past 35 years, the judges should, I submit have taken that Superintendent's message to heart for I did not create this debacle known as our current Justice System; merely exposed the dry rot which can be seen in many associated forums as supported by the media and the politicians. As a piece of entertainment, Teacher Ratched is right up there with Nurse Ratched in One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest. (I even have a script for an interested producer,)

7) Specifically, I call for the minute notes of the illicit second hearing notes held in July by the Board with their Counsel, Stuart Clyne QC. If fraud is shown, then everything emanating from it is 'null and void'. Hence this is the second requirement for Roger j. in dealing 'with all issues'.

8) There are many, many matters of judicial cupidity should Roger j. request them which already exist on my website: employeescasecanada.ca. I merely highlight the obvious.

9) How would Roger j. deal with the charge of fraud relating to the conduct of the Saskatoon Court and the B.C. legal firm Harris & Co. pending in a N.B. Court considering how badly Saskatoon was compromised? Unfortunately, this was a repeat of a 1916 Regina 'bellyflop'. Does he wish to open this can of worms? Or possibly the civil class action in Edmonton regarding a number of judges which I refused to join questioning why the taxpayer should bail out judges who should have been charge criminally. That action was in reference to the Vancouver Chief Justice aborting my case in B.C.

10) In ON, how would Roger J. deal directly with the offences which I have filed for fraud with the Legal Society regarding the two young lawyers in this current case which does not acknowledge its legal mail. Without that disclosure, these two young lawyers both of whom I charge with fraud before the Legal Society, have no grounds for an action.

11) How would Roger j. deal with the focus of the dealings in Ottawa court on the Franco Alulio logarithm, which deprives me of any legal representation in any matter in any forum reminiscent of the 'Final Solution' of Nazi Germany?

12) One question which has to be settled before the next hearing should there be one, is my legal status as a citizen. If lawyers cannot represent me; how can I represent myself, needs be asked? Only the GG appears situated to respond to this all important question.

13) To be sure, to the extent that Roger j. plans to avoid proceeding on this level in 'discussing all issues', his name will be forever 'bronzed' as an object lesson for every first year law class.

 

REPERCUSSIONS:

14) Generally, matters such as the above are cleared away for election purposes but there is no threat here (unless social media takes off) as the press have a national boycott of anything under my name in the last 20 years. Secondly, all politicians adhere to this boycott; the Liberals, the Conservatives, NDP, Greens and Canadian Party. That latter is a bit of a surprise as their leader is one politician having at least half a brain in his head.

15) At this time, Roger j. has an option but after March 15, that Option expires.

 

PERSONAL NOTE TO THE INCUMBENT GG (This letter may precede a new appointment)

16) I'll bet you wish you had never signed on for this Office after reading the above. Should you roll up this 'scrap of paper' (WWII Reference: Belgium) and tell the powerbrokers where to stuff it, I am sure no-one would blame you. Contracts now count for nothing in Canada.

17) In any event; while this is sent to you marked PERSONAL & CONFIDENTIAL, I would not recommend replying at this time. Nor would I recommend that you hand it over to staff for a Reply as a few decades ago, I received a letter stating that for many years, the Office of the GG had not interfered with the practice of government since WWII. I label that unwitting letter as 'ode to the ossification of the Office of the GG.'

18) Your authority to act is under 'we, the people', a term not understood by your predecessor, particularly as I have shown that the Charter of Rights and Freedoms is a hollow shell leaving individuals such as myself to be the unwilling victims of unrepentant authority.

19) A new addition to this series is the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal and the Canadian Civil Rights Organizations. To be blunt, I don't need more Organizations per se, but rather an individual who stands out in his or her Organization. Other countries produce such individuals while Canada seems relegated to cliché ridden personages more interested in how they look on TV or appear in the media.

20) As the two U.S. Presidents have not acknowledged the Franco Alulio algorithm to date, my U.S. point man on this matter is Professor VDH Hanson as all North American drivers are at risk

 

cc Deputy MInister Chrystia Freeland / Ottawa Justice Pierre Roger

 

N.B. In the event that Roger j. does not recuse himself or choose to drop the case on my request on grounds 'makes no case' or the Applicant's claim that I am frivolous & vexatious by March 15, then additional action will take place by me before the April 8 H.D. In the event Roger j. uses this trial to project his own personal agenda, the GG is asked to pursue him in the name of 'we, the people'. The G.G. should be prepared to serve in my place on April 8.

 

(signed) Roger Callow 

 

FEB.12

FOR LAWYERS ONLY? (rogercallow.com MEDIA feb.12-2021 (2 pages)

FEB.11-2021 Ottawa Court Justice Pierre Roger where I was not in attendance: CV20-849830   

 1) The correct response for Roger j. is to dispense with this case for being overly broad under the banner 'the case lacks merit' which would put an end to all the Employee's Case challenges considering my Dec. 31-2021 volunteer action to drop any further quest for compensation as I am not going to get it. The only reason that I participate in Feb.11 is that I am the Respondent

4 P.M. 3 page Decision from Justice Pierre Roger which refuses to recognize any other vertical dimension other than ZOOM which I do not have and the court was unwilling to contact me on any level = request for the recusal of Justice Roger through arrangements made by Deputy Minister C. Freeland. (that is, until a new Gov. Gen. is appointed) P.S. Note 3):I was here and there was no phone call from the court at 11:45 A.M. I find Justice Roger to be prejudiced against my interests as outlined in 3).  I cannot trust to this Registry on any level. Either the Registry is misleading the Justice or the Justice is misleading me. Would the newly assigned justice please accept teleconferencing. Immediate attention required as April 8,2021 is the new H.D.  To repeat, my interest does not lie with pursuing these two lawyers. It does lie in the court not ghosting such as the Franco Alulio algorithm.

2) Consider the overkill of Roger j.'s unnecessarily restrictive comments:

(1) The applicant brings an application seeking an order that the respondent is a vexatious litigant. ( I am the Respondent, for Christ's sake. So why didn't Roger j. merely grant this Decision and put an end to this case similar to '2014'? = Roger j. marching to the tune of a different drummer as will be enunciated below. RC)

(2) The application was issued on November 13, 2020. It was served personally on November 23,2020. In addition, prior to the return of the application, it was served again, together with the factum, by email on February 2,2021. (The second factum was a complete revision from the first. No mention is made of my rebuttals to both in correspondence in the hands of Roger j. = misleading statement on his part. RC)

(3) Counsel for the applicant informed the court that he or his office has received correspondence (obviously submitted only by hearsay R.C.) from the respondent which makes it clear (prejudice RC) that the respondent is aware of this application, and of this date (true in general but a piece of prevarication as details left out i.e. court not to proceed without my presence unless disposing the case. R.C.) In fact, in this correspondence, the respondent appears to indicate that he has no intention of calling in to the scheduled zoom conference for this application-he wants the court to call him (as per the rules of teleconferencing which, in his duplicity, Roger makes no mention. RC) Accordingly, the register called the respondent this morning to join the zoom conference but the respondent was not available or did not answer the telephone call. It is now past 11:45 and the respondent has not joined the conference, and we can't reach him. (no such telephone call received at 11.45 or any other time during the day. SEE 4 PM above = judicial prejudice as Roger would well know that with telephone conferencing which he makes no mention, is done where the court contacts the litigants. RC)

(5) This adjournment is peremptory on the respondent (rather, peremptory on the judge RC) If the respondent does not attend the application, at the date indicated above, by joining the scheduled zoom conference, then the application may proceed and be heard in his absence. (my underling as Roger j. denies the existence of teleconferencing. He had it in writing from me in any event that if he disposed of the case a priori, then everything is complete. So why didn't he do so is the $64 dollar question? RC)

(6) The respondent must connect to the zoom coordinates provided by the court or else call the number provided by the court in order to join the zoom conference for this application on April 8. He must join or call at the scheduled time - as the court will not call him on April 8 (technology apparently requires that he connects or call in). (As the court never contacted me, I never received a call-in number or opportunity to be set up for ZOOM. SEE  4 P.M. above RC  What is meant by 'scheduled time' as in the zoom format, one can be left hanging for hours. Roger j. should have made a specific time assignment here = prejudice against my case.)

(7)...and shall not pursue any step or seek any remedy in the one remaining action until this application is dealt with. (seems innocent enough but under 'pursue any step', I submit Roger j. has given himself the power to invoke a criminal charge for using the name of the Defendant lawyer on my internet site in a side ruling.(Not a problem for Feb. 11 going forth, where I redact the Defendant's name but his name abounds on previous material on my web site. The point is that the public couldn't give a rat's ass about a client suing a lawyer, but this is not about the lawyer rather, it is submitted here, about a judge seeking to lay a criminal charge in order to expunge my website, much like the Patriot Act in the U.S. That action parallels one under BILL C-10 in which those same self-same judges would conspire to gain control over the internet as enunciated by SUN columnist Lorne Gunter on Feb. 03-2021. The point here is that Roger j had my written permission to drop this case without a hearing. He didn't respond to that point leading to why I have called for his recusal.)

3) Why a copy of this account goes to Deputy Minister Chrystia Freeland as well as the U.S. Embassy (Ottawa) considering that she is the fox guarding the chickens in this bid to obtain judge-gov't control over the internet, must be puzzling to the reader. The point here is that I am awaiting the appointment of a new Gov. Gen. which, while a titular post, has plenipotentiary powers to protect a person against a capricious gov't. I still require a massive movement on the social media paralleling the U.S. where groups supporting Trump, the most powerful politician in the U.S., exist in every state in their bid to oppose elitism in both Parties. Indeed throughout the world, individuals place their lives on the line daily on this level, but not in Canada where we have only the mirror of our own cowardice to justify our inaction.

4) The essence of habeas corpus, the bedrock of all law being disclosure, is absent in both the U.S. and Canada as courts play 'footsie' with hiding secrets; the 35 year Employee's Case being a prime example. In the U.S., judges refused to call for any meaningful examination of ballot box stuffing prompting some interests so accused to sue, trusting to the judges to withhold disclosure. In Canada, the situation is no better as evidenced by Crown misdeeds in such as the Huawei Meng Wanzhou deportation case and the recent Admiral Mark Norman case. The public is becoming increasingly aware of how the courts supported by media are undermining the law by refusing disclosure. My 15 year PLACARD: STAY OUT OF A CANADIAN COURTROOM UNLESS YOU FIRST BUY THE JUDGE is gaining traction in these COVID times as an increasing number of the public are fed up with the authorities in all institutions for good reasons.

ACTION TO BE TAKEN

5) For individuals or small groups to hit social media outlining the above story 'behind the headlines'. That advice is to non-voters or those disenchanted with voting as voters tend to look to others to protect them; some even to the extent of believing a change of gov't. makes any difference. (similar to COVID, the 'Old Boy's Club' just 'is' and rules Canada through the courts and the Privy Council)

6) Recognize that I tried and failed against a gov't conspiracy so don't repeat my mistakes. My suggestion is to hit the streets with no violence to people. Add my PLACARD to your protest: JUSTICE FOR ROGER CALLOW

Get This Straight(c. 1986)
'...The teacher who was dumped was Roger Callow, and his dismissal (whatever happened to 'lay-off with recall rights'?) will go into the history books along with other great happenings like the invention of the steam engine and the telephone.' (you may yet be right here, Doug)'...Can you remember any other teacher being shown the door for incompetence?...The revolutionary heave-ho of which I speak became possible because the Socreds have brought in BILL 35 (dead on, Doug)...As far as Mr. Callow is concerned, I cannot say whether he is in fact incompetent...(Why not? You did everywhere else in your diatribe)...Enter Mrs. Margot Furk, the schoolboard woman from West Vancouver who looks meek, but isn't...(she looks about as meek as Attila the Hun...and to think Dougy was also criticized for being anti-female) She was one of the leading lobbyists for BILL 35 (Don't forget the role of John Reynolds, local MPP now the federal justice critic for the Reform Party for Christ's sake!) and voted for Callow's removal...'How was it possible, I asked her, that a man who had been employed for 17 years could be incompetent?' "Because in the past no one had the guts to do anything about him," she added smartly...UP THE REVOLUTION' (I'll try, Doug, I'll try...but it seems the revolution has already hoisted you on your own petard ...so, Doug...enjoy, enjoy the revolutionary heave ho.... Roger Callow

 

cc U.S. Embassy (Ottawa) / Cdn. legal outfits / C. Freeland / L.Gunter

 

 

FEB.06

MESSAGE: 'Ask Ellie' O.C. Feb.6-2021 p. C10 'vapid young people'

1) The statement from the 32 year old to you is clear: '...I don't need counselling, I need fun!'  during COVID lockdown although your response is not as  pinpointed as it should be.

2) I don't believe this 32 year old requires counselling either. She is what she is and merely asks for additional advice to entertain herself. You fell back on tried and true advice column mechanisms of slapping her in the face. In essence you said...'oh, grow up!' knowing she never will.

3) What is required here is an alternative approach, whether workable or not in the 32 year old case. You hint at it with 'healthy outdoor walks' which she could take with someone else or a rescue dog,etc. although I would recommend solo walks in which she makes a point of talking to passerbys, mothers with babies, owners with dogs, homeowners shovelling snow, in order to broaden her horizon which is what I do on a daily basis. She could also volunteer with group activities e.g. work at a rescue dog facility. Reduce her addiction to telephone and internet connections as they only exacerbate her condition under COVID restrictions. Her sage observation here is that she does not wish to dig up bad things with counselling (the darker side of counselling). I submit your response to her would start with...'As you do not want counselling, why not consider doing.... and leave it at that. Too much advice can be a dangerous thing.

4) People who 'stick to their guns' - even as this 32 year old does in part, are too easily condemned by you as you focus negatively on the person...it reminds me of the old Ann Landers dictum...'Suck it up toots' but in more refined language. People of this persuasion - of which I count myself - are also praised by some for having a value system among the few who recognize that standing up to the challenge (e.g. Navalny) is the main focus of life as the outcomes are invariably in the hands of others. The world abounds in these Navalny types; just not in Canada.

5) My upcoming Newsletter is being posted currently. rogercallow.com FEBRUARY 11-2021  MEDIA where your name is starred prominently. Remember, I have assigned you the task of defining 'National Cowardice'? Further, I add the topic of 'fusion' for a first time which, if you have not heard this digital term, is a must read.

6) Still, if you come to Ottawa, I would gladly go for a walk with someone who is 'not dead from the neck up'

rogercallow.com

 

FEB.06

NEWSLETTER 'FEB. 11' 2021 (2 pages) CANADA- A NATION OF COWARDS?

The Current Newsletter delivered before the Feb. 11 'vertical hearing date' has the previous NEWSLETTER as a precedent. SEE rogercallow.com for both along with FEB.01 NEWSLETTER

 

JAN. 15-2021 NEWSLETTER POST IN STAFFROOM - locate an 'influencer'

BACKGROUND:  

BY: Roger Callow  rcallow770@gmail.com  'KING OF THE WHISTLEBLOWERS' ...Time to end this 35 year unresolved Judicial farce, the employeescasecanada.ca  which I did on  DEC. 31-2020. The Employer won, I didn't nor did 37 million Canadians when they lost Justice Canada due to its systemic malfeasance = destruction of democratic Canada in totality. The last Act is slated in an Ottawa courtroom on Feb. 11-2021.

cc Deputy P.M. Chrystia Freeland as the last Canadian authority left standing, to either act or get out of politics. As Trump did not see the threat to U.S. interests, perhaps President  Biden will.

cc Andrew Coyne (Globe& Mail) Mark Bonokoski / Tarek Fatah (Ottawa Sun) Kelly Egan (Ottawa Citizen) Ellie Tesher (The Star) J. Ivison / C. Selby (National Post)

The only answer is what one sees around the world...hit the streets but please, no violence to people. It is a waste of time voting under these circumstances in Canada: VOTERS: FOOLS VOTING FOR OTHER FOOLS

THE THREAT

 It's the algorithm, stupid, not the people. Canadians are so caught up with the conspiracy against Roger Callow, that they do not perceive the real threat; namely, the algorithm which Franco Alulio, Deputy Minister of Transport-Medical in Ontario set up by which a targeted individual such as myself can be deprived of all legal representation for any matter due to his bogus driver license suspension. Hence removal of anyone in any form such as a trial associated with this stunt; namely, Alulio, myself, the judges, the 'Bobbsey Twin' lawyers with the last act slated for Feb. 11-2021 where I am the Respondent, or other conspirators is immaterial. The only way to defeat this algorithm is 1)expose the perfidy of Alulio publicly and 2)charge him criminally with a 20 year sentence held over his head. Otherwise, COVID 19 will look like child's play if this algorithm grows beyond Alulio.

5) The failure of the media to expose the Franco Alulio story ranks right up there with the biggest abuse in Canadian society on a par with what happened in Nazi Germany...Feb. 11-2021 is D-Day for the Cdn. media.

 

THE PRESENT

1) There are three possible outcomes for the FEB. 11 Hearing. A) The Ottawa court acts on the first Option which I post to them as Respondent: For the court to dismiss the case launched by the Appellant as being 'without merit and a waste of the court's time'. Compensation to this Respondent should be in the same terms as the 'significant amount' requested by the Applicant

B) The Court assigns a win to the Applicant without calling for the ON Law Society Report in which I detail separate cases of fraud by the Appellant and his Cavanagh LLP Representative. The ON Law Society has a reputation for not responding to its legal mail.

C) The court prolongs this case (for a second 35 years?) in which no judgment is given. The Applicant will have the civil charge of fraud quietly lifted as paralleled by Justice C. MacLeod in 2020 with two of my other cases. The Ottawa Court refuses to give me Hearing Dates for other listed cases. Add to this, a blanket ban on all proceedings including my internet sites for which a criminal charge could then be issued against me explaining why I am publishing this Newsletter prior to Feb. 11-2021. The Court did not notify me of the change in Docket Number of this case in which they move a 'hyphen' in the case no. Anyone knows what happens to a changed password in a digital matter= skulduggery although I am already on record as calling for a Trusteeship to be invoked over the Ottawa Court System although under whom is moot.

2) There are 2 basic reasons why I am publishing now with reason one explained above.

The second reason is unrelated to this case but is reflected in BILL C-10 in which the Feds would seek to complete their control over the media by controlling the internet.(Parallels may be found in the U.S. in which the media was hi-jacked for a Democratic win explaining my reference to 'President Pelosi' representing the return of the elitists from the Trump 'bozos'.)

3) From my website; rogercallow.com FEBRUARY ; consider the following as an explanation as to why individuals world-wide are stripped of their identities with China leading the way:

FEB.05 A) If former President Eisenhower (1960) were President today, he would warn us, not against the alliance of the Industrial-military complex; rather, it would be the political-digital alignment in terms of iA. Already both China and the U.S. are collecting DNA so that the powers that be can rule the world through direct individual contact...crash the car your driving? It can be done. Countries and cities such as NY have police able to tap into an individual's complete background through a process known as 'fusion' which in the past in some cases, required a court Order. So you got swabbed for COVID...your DNA is now on file on a smart phone with the NYP. Next step? Columnist Lorne Gunter (SUN Feb. 03-2021) has that answer...through BILL C-10, the gov't. takes over the internet so make a copy of this website as it will be the first to go along with critical columnists as Gunter details.

Faced  with this second challenge, I chose to put an end to my involvement in the Employee's Case as of Dec.31-2020 with only the stand-alone Franco Alulio algorithm left for the U.S. with Professor VDH Hanson@gmail.com to be my point man in the U.S. We are both students of History with this difference; I am an activist. Will Hanson, a writer, provoke an 'influencer' in the U.S. to stand up to this algorithm which deprives a target of any legal representation on any basis? Mind you, anyone can appeal to social media on publicizing this topic.

4) President Biden has every right to send the Marines into Canada, its 'northern defense flank' in the latter's failure to control a run-away bureaucrat. But it need not come to that as the public under COVID are becoming only too aware of the moribund nature of our institutions. The U.S. Constitution, in that regard, permits us to exercise the 14th Colony Option of becoming a U.S. state under a Governor and Council which would wipe out our redundant and expensive political system created in 1867  under conditions which no longer exist. (Hawaii as a Territory was victimized until they became a state in 1949 and sent Senators to Washington.) Further, miscreant judges go to jail in the U.S.; not so in Canada.

5) iA is the digital future for the individual and is as important as the topic of climate change

 

Yours truly, Roger Callow (signed) 'U.S. is a 'can do' Nation; Canada is a 'cannot do' Nation

cc U.S. Embassy (Ottawa) to warn all U.S. diplomatic and commercial interests of the state of affairs in Canadian courts of law.

cc Deputy Minister Chrystia Freeland representing all politicians in Canada and who is looking through a foggy crystal ball as to her other affairs (and mine).

cc Gang of 7 media types plus Lorne Gunter columnist, to publish now; FEB .11 is too late.

Andrew Coyne (Globe& Mail) Mark Bonokoski / Tarek Fatah (Ottawa Sun) Kelly Egan (Ottawa Citizen) Ellie Tesher (The Star) J. Ivison / C. Selby (National Post)

cc VDH Hanson U.S. Professor published in Ottawa Sun to replace Prof. Walter E. Williams (d)as U.S. point man

cc ON Legal Society by mail as they have blanked other means of communication

 

FEB.03

February 03,2021  (2 Pages) Sent by fax to Cavanagh LLP: 613-569-8668

(rogercallow.com  MEDIA feb. 03)

MESSAGE:

1) Acknowledgment of the below email from Dixon esq CV20-849830 received on Feb. 02-2021 is made. It is a heck of a lot better than the response which I ever get from the Ottawa Court Registry. It is for this and other reasons for which I call for a trusteeship to be invoked over Ottawa Courts for detailed reasons provided to oversight bodies which never reply.

 

Kris Dixon

Tue, 2 Feb, 09:37 (1 day ago)

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/1/images/cleardot.gif

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/1/images/cleardot.gif

to Ottawa, me, Kelli, Jodyhttps://mail.google.com/mail/u/1/images/cleardot.gif

Good morning Mr. Gagnier

I received correspondence from the respondent, Mr. Callow indicating that he absolutely requires a teleconference (i.e., versus remote video conference). 

I see below that there is a teleconference line available. I am merely alerting the court as to Mr. Callow’s preference. It is not apparent from today’s correspondence that he is aware the availability of an alternate format for submissions. 

I will attend the February 11, 2021 hearing via Zoom. 

Our client’s materials will be served and filed later today.

 

Yours truly,  Kris

2) If the Feb 11-2021 Hearing Date is being used by this Respondent by teleconferencing (and I thank you here for repeating the request on my behalf) and yourself as Plaintiff by ZOOM (both systems having technical glitches publicized elsewhere), I submit future hearings be held in writing 'party by party'; that is, if the presiding Justice does not choose Option 1 repeated here in which case there is no need for further trial: OPTION 1 (Or a lengthy OPTION 2).

For the court to dismiss the case launched by the Appellant as being 'without merit and a waste of the court's time'. Compensation to this Respondent should be in the same terms as the 'significant amount' requested by the Appellant.

3) As Respondent, I am still prepared to honour a position which I took at the FEB 27 H.D. 2020 before Justice Conway 19-SD-155235 in which I offer to withdraw my case against Bissionette esq for fraud as detailed with the ON Legal Society which does not acknowledge its legal mail and to lift a second alleged fraud by Dixon esq. representing Bissionette (both lawyers made private submissions to judges) should they acquire my complete medical record from Towngate Family Clinic's, young Dr. Jahagirdar (Dr. J.) without which I cannot get a Family Doctor. Nor in a related matter, may I get legal representation on any legal matter due to the linking Franco Alulio algorithm. That latter action by me goes without a Response CV20-82943 and if the presiding Justice chooses OPTION 2, that case should precede the current one having been filed previously as this matter is at the core of all actions in ON dating from the ascension to the Premiership of Doug Ford. I have called for his removal from all politics on a non partisan basis for this reason.

4) That request for my complete medical Record, which belongs to me and not the Doctor, includes three redacted letters in September and October, 2019, with the separation of my wife of 45 years and myself. As I dismissed Dr. J. for alleged fraudulent actions CV20-82659on November 01-2019, that file must include her illicit correspondence with such as the Ottawa General Hospital up to January 2020 when I was released from a 9-day illegal lock-down in the mental clinic. I sued the Hospital for $10 million CV20-82847 but Justice C. MacLeod dropped that action without a hearing thus changing forever the basic character of Canadian Law. I sued MacLeod CV20-83096 only to have A.G.'s Master Kaufmann (the same one who met privately with Dixon) drop that action; again, without any hearing.

5) Hence I am left as a Canadian citizen in limbo first explaining my appeal to the U.S. Embassy (Ottawa) to be a 'friend of Roger Callow' as the media would ghost this major story of all time.

6) I thank-you for taking the time to issue to the courts the 6 pages of material sent to you on Feb.01-2021 considering the Registry's obfuscation for this Respondent.

7) As soon as you learn the name of the presiding Justice, please ask whether he or she was originally a Federal Court appointee as this is a factor regarding possible oversight review.

8) A copy of this letter goes to the 'Gang of Seven' media types plus Lorne Gunter of the Ottawa Sun who rails against BILL C-10  quite rightfully in that the Feds would seek control over the Social Media through a fascist internet control. (SEE Ottawa Sun article this date for that shocking account.) But then what the media is doing to me by ghosting this issue is what the Feds will be doing to them under BILL C-10. The media must publish pre-FEB.11 on this case for reporting afterwards is merely reporting on history as opposed to the news.

9) By rights, the ON Legal Society and the College of Physicians & Surgeons - Ethical Branch and the Psychiatric Association should have their respective Charters lifted.

 

Yours truly, Roger Callow (signed) Feb. 03-2021  self-represented Respondent CV20-849830

 

cc U.S. Embassy (Ottawa) to warn all U.S. diplomatic and commercial interests of the state of affairs in Canadian courts of law.

cc Deputy Minister Chrystia Freeland representing all politicians in Canada and who is looking through a foggy crystal ball as to her other affairs (and mine).

cc Gang of 7 media types plus Lorne Gunter columnist, to publish now; FEB .11 is too late.

Andrew Coyne (Globe& Mail) Mark Bonokoski / Tarek Fatah (Ottawa Sun) Kelly Egan (Ottawa Citizen) Ellie Tesher (The Star) J. Ivison / C. Selby (National Post)

cc VDH Hanson U.S. Professor published in Ottawa Sun to replace Prof. Walter E. Williams (d)

cc ON Legal Society by mail as they have blanked other means of communication

 

Did I leave anyone out? Does anyone know? Does anyone care?

 

FEB.01-2021 

TO: Cavanagh LLP  CV20-849830 by fax: 613-569-8668  3 pages with (3 letters A to C)

FROM: Roger Callow rcallow770@gmail.com  fax: 613-521-1739

TOPIC: Bissionette esq. Appellant  v  Callow self-represented Respondent H.D. FEB. 11-2021

MESSAGE: The key to the below letters is that the hearing is NOT to proceed unless I have a presence by teleconferencing. If I do not receive confirmation of such arrangements by the evening of FEB. 10, I will e-mail you regarding that fact.  (This correspondence should be made known to the court by you. Of course I expect a written Decision.)  P.S. Where is SDC 19-155135 Feb. 27-2021 Written Decision-Conway j. ?) Roger Callow (signed)

 

(A)                                          File: rogercallow.com  FEB.01-2021  MEDIA

TO : U.S. Embassy (Ottawa) by fax: JANUARY 27-2021   613-241-7845  1 pge. 

FROM: Roger Callow self-represented Respondent CV20-849830  (Feb.11-2021 hearing date)

rcallow770@gmail.com

REFERENCE: ADDENDUM to ORAL ARGUMENT dated DEC.08-2020 by the Respondent

SEE employeescasecanada.ca 2020 LEGAL MAIL this date.

cc Andrew Coyne (Globe& Mail) Mark Bonokoski / Tarek Fatah (Ottawa Sun) Kelly Egan (Ottawa Citizen) Ellie Tesher (The Star) J. Ivison / C. Selby (National Post)CAVANAGH

MESSAGE:

1) I am sure that President Biden has concerns other than the direct interests of Roger Callow on Feb. 11-2021 where the future state of Canada is to be defined in an Ottawa courtroom.

2) I am equally sure indirectly that President Biden is concerned with matters relating to a 'clear and present danger' to U.S. interests as a consequence of this legal matter. I speak here of the Franco Alulio algorithm of which the U.S. Embassy (Ottawa) has been kept fully apprised under two Presidents.

3) This algorithm is central to the legal interests of Roger Callow as well as to the legal interests indirectly for every N. American motorist for we live in a car culture.

4) My repeated request here is that President Biden publicize this issue to U.S. diplomatic and commercial interests as it affects dealings with Canadian courts of law.

5) Should President Biden choose to ignore this request, perhaps the new Patriot Party being organized in Palm Beach will oblige.

 

Yours truly, (Roger Callow)

 

B) January 22,2021

 

TO: Superior Court of Justice Registrar            FROM: Roger Callow self represented Respondent

161 Elgin St. Ottawa, ON K2P 2K1                                  #2001- 1285 Cahill Dr. Ottawa K1V 9A7

1 page by mail cc Cavanagh LLP by email                      rcallow770@gmail. com t.613-521-1739

cc Deputy PM Freeland by fax /Media by email   web: roger callow.com MEDIA JAN. 22-2021

     U.S Embassy (Ottawa) by fax

 

REFERENCE: CV20-849830 Bissonnette v. Callow H.D. February 11-2021

MESSAGE:

1) As the Respondent concerned whom wishes to attend the above hearing by teleconferencing, I request that you make the necessary arrangements.

2) Normally, the Registry in conjunction with the presiding Justice confirms teleconferencing the previous day by telephone.

3) Considering the anomalies being experienced in this case, I submit that if I do not hear from the Registrar on Wednesday, Feb. 10, I will conclude that no teleconferencing arrangements were made.

4) My biggest concern is that no hearing will be held on Feb. 11-2021 with the court issuing a private Decision to the Plaintiff about which I will not be informed. Such action would give the two lawyers the necessary relief they request to be exonerated on separate charges of fraud while leaving the Franco Alulio algorithm intact with the courts refusing to entertain previously laid actions by this writer; all pointing to Alulio's inopportune driver license scam which is anathema to all North American drivers. It is a repeat of Ottawa court action in 2014 on this legal matter with the addition of the algorithm mentioned above.

 

Yours truly, Roger Callow  Respondent

 

C)                                            FEB. 11-2021 OUTCOMES:

CV20-089840 Ottawa Court House (2 hrs.)

Bissionnette (esq) Appellant v. Roger Callow Respondent

MESSAGE:

1) This story on the media has already been told favouring, as it does, the big Employer, and no matter what they do, their boycott of this national issue for the minority (me) for many years puts to rest any credibility that the media might have. TWO VERSIONS (sub-heading) both written by me - one purporting to be the media position and the second a rebuttal to the first account puts in sharp relief the two sides so that the public can see this disparity. For other reasons, the media is disappearing in any event as only talk-show radio appears to have much of a future.

2) For similar reasons, the politicians of Canada have disappeared as a force as the public have gone from a positive to a negative perception of them inside of one year. COVID is exposing that disjunct not only in Canada but throughout the world. Putin's warning at Davros 'all against all' is a prescient observation in that regard. The silence of Canada's politicians on the Employee's Case, particularly the Franco Alulio algorithm right out of Nazi Germany, can now metastasize with the addition of medical treatment centres (Auschwitz) due to political inaction.

3) The courts of law repeatedly lie (as CBC's senior correspondent, Neil MacDonald has asserted recently. SEE rogercallow.com MEDIA feb. for excerpts.) I have always maintained that the 35 year Employee's Case did not create the malfeasance and misfeasance of the courts; it has merely exposed  long term corruption marked primarily by the failure of oversight bodies to check on charges against judges. No Cdn. judge has ever been sent to jail.

In the words of city guru, Jane Jacobs, a country goes rotten when its infrastructure fails. Canada's infrastructure has failed. I call it Institutional Autism where institutions speak only to other institutions with the individual left out. So what the gullible call 'law and order' is actually 'lawlessness and disorder by the officials '. Ancient Rome fell on those terms.

4) So, Mrs. Lincoln, you might just as well skip the Play and stay home planning your husband's funeral. With that analogy, there are 3 possible outcomes for FEB. 11-2021:

a) Granting the young 'Bobbsey Twin Lawyers' whom I have accused of fraud to the ON Legal Society (which does not respond to its legal mail) exoneration from my claims with 'substantial fees' to be applied. It goes without saying that the Franco Alulio algorithm where a target is barred from having legal counsel for any legal matter is ghosted with this '20-20 hindsight manoeuvre'; a devastating indictment in which all drivers in North America are condemned accordingly. A bigger crime is being condoned with this option; namely, the privilege of some legal counsel to approach the judges privately before a hearing- 'In the halls of Justice, all justice is in the halls'. Further with this option, the two young lawyers which I have charged separately with fraud get to keep their legal licenses.(The strongest Union in Canada is the legal fraternity. They know how to take care of their own.)

b) To avoid any controversy, the court could refuse to hear the case on the grounds that the Plaintiffs 'have not made a case'. That would have to be done at the outset before any argument is taken based on the written evidence before the court. That alternative leaves the govt'. with a 'dirty biscuit' much like the Ford gov't inherited this 'dirty biscuit' with a docket number assigned on the last day of the preceding Liberals being in Office.

c) This option is more interesting but just as fallacious. The court will call for my written rebuttal which the Registry is blocking through spurious means. Further they will call for the Franco Allulio response as to why he invoked this charge in the first place in a perverted manner by changing the suspension forms in the fashion that he did. Other disclosure may be called for. It will be done in such legal fashion that the Plaintiff can appeal the Decision to a 3-person Appeal Court which is, of course, is a matter of 'issue oblivion' by these political Appeal Courts. In brief, the court will be seen to observe the principle of disclosure without actually fulfilling the task. To be sure, a desperate media will latch onto this alternative in the short range. After all, this trial is essentially about the demise of the Cdn. media as seen through the failure of the gov't. institutions outlined above.

5) As Respondent, I have prohibited the Feb. 11 Court from proceeding without teleconferencing privileges for me. The Ottawa Court Registry has been appealed to on that basis. The proceedings should last about 5 minutes as I seek time to study  disclosure documents of the Plaintiff.

6) So, dear reader, similar to Mrs. Lincoln, you might just as well skip the Play on Feb. 11-2021

and stay home planning the funeral for the nation of Canada.

 

Respectfully submitted, Roger Callow 'The last of the good guys'

Now you know why I don't vote any longer

 

FEB. 01-2021 Bissionnette Appellant v. Callow Respondent CV20-849830 H.D. FEBRUARY 11- 2021 (In addition to 3 page background document also asked by Cavanagh LLP (Ken Dixon) to forward a copy to the court.)  2 pages

 

WRITTEN PRESENTATION BY THE RESPONDENT TO REQUEST THAT THE APPELLANT ISSUE THIS DOCUMENT TO THE COURT ON FEB. 11 H.D. AS THE RESPONDENT WILL BE ATTENDING BY TELECONFERENCING. AS THE RESPONDENT DOES NOT HAVE THE NAME OF THE PRESIDING JUSTICE, THERE IS NO OTHER WAY TO ENTER THIS DOCUMENT INTO COURT.

 

POINT OF ORDER

1) As the Respondent, Roger Callow, I prohibit the court from meeting without my presence unless OPTION 1 is selected:                         OPTION 1

A) For the court to dismiss the case launched by the Appellant as being 'without merit and a waste of the court's time'. Compensation to this Respondent should be in the same terms as the 'significant amount' requested by the Appellant.

OR

OPTION 2

B) To proceed with this case from which 'there will be no return'.

2) This manoeuvre by the Appellant is a repeat of a stunt the Employer pulled in 2014. Rather than replying to my filed case; the Employer in this matter supplanted that filed case by originating one of their own so that they remained in control of the case. The outcome? The court under Justice C. McKinnon denied the Employer their request to reject all previous legal action in this matter ruling, in that process, that as the Respondent, I was being frivolous & vexatious, a favourite 'get-out-of jail' card by some judges. The firm representing the Employer dropped out without collecting any fee from this party and explains why no reputable legal firm will represent them in Ontario. Further, McKinnon j. was cited for fraud by creating three different judgments; none recognizing the existence of the other(would the real C. McKinnon j please stand up?)

3) In this option, I request disclosure:

a) An explanation from Franco Alulio Deputy Minister of Transport-medical as to why he chose on his own volition to suspend my driver's licence by perverting the forms in such fashion that I can neither get a new family Doctor and have lost all legal access to a lawyer in any matter. That indictment extends to the N. American driving public. The court may choose to request that the case I have laid against Alulio CV20-82943 to which he does not respond, to hold this case prior to the case above which could be stalled on grounds of a 'Stay'.

b) An explanation as to 19-SC-155235 (Small Debt Court Conway j. Feb.27-2020) explaining:

(i) Why was a mandamus court later turned into a 'settlement conference' at the Hearing permitted to go ahead when I was not consulted to this 'sideways' move?

(ii) Why did Bissionette lie...'I never did' regarding a malicious  call to the police on a fake wellness check on this writer?' He should have been charged accordingly, in my opinion.

(iii) Why did Conway j. permit a private sidebar with Bissionnette before I entered the hearing room in which it was decided to change horses in mid-stream and call it a 'settlement court?'

(iv) If Conway j. had pursued the above and other questions in a diligent fashion, there would have been no call for the present court. I called for her recusal which she rejected.

c) Why did Ottawa Justice, C. MacLeod drop two filed actions by me for fraud without a hearing and without taking argument thereby changing the course of justice in Canada so that no powerful interest need ever again bother with a court of law...just find a compliant judge.

Those two related charges were against The Ottawa General Hospital CV20-82847 and young Dr. Jahagirdar of Towngate Family Clinic CV20-82659; both for fraud.

d) How did A.G.'s Master Kaufmann, during the lockdown, obtain an Ottawa Registry file number to quash the action which I had laid against Justice MacLeod CV20-83096 in the same fashion as MacLeod j. of not taking argument? That duplicity extends to Master Kaufmann accepting a private meeting with Dixon (a former ESL teacher in S. Korea in 2015) now an Ottawa lawyer in a bouquet outfit (Cavanagh LLP) who thinks nothing of having private judicial meetings and, in this case being obliged with a written Decision. I was never notified until after that Decision was delivered.

e) Details of the above illicit actions were included in my Reply to the above action side-tracked by the Ottawa Registry and the ON Legal Society who never responds to their legal mail; including against separate charges of fraud against the two young lawyers named here nor in 2014 against Hicks, Morley et al. Hence ordering disclosure from this body is all important in Option 2 as I see this case being significantly changed as a result of suspensions for these two lawyers being charged separately by me for fraudulent actions.

4) The above material is all included in my submissions to this hearing but blocked by the Registry for fake technical excuses. The presiding judge can now order them, but of course a second hearing is required for this option to proceed.

5) Will the presiding justice 'take the bull by the horns' in the many challenges which I have outlined in Option 2 or will he or she fall into the trap that over 50 judges have willingly done so across Canada in matters growing out of this unresolved labour case where no compensation has been paid contrary to any number of laws on the topic?

6) I am on record calling for the expulsion of Premier Doug Ford from all politics - particularly the Franco Alulio stunt - as a non-partisan request.

7) The media is also being kept apprised as their mandate to date appears to be reporting on history as defined by the top 1% in our society as opposed to reporting on the news as defined by such as the upcoming hearing on February 11-2021 in an Ottawa Courtroom

8) Finally, is your original appointment to the bench as a Federal judge (the Federal Court judges transfer to the more lucrative provincial courts). Most judges in my cases have this unsavoury connection including the Chief Justice of the Ottawa Courts. If you tell me now and I feel it necessary to get oversight body investigation, (the Judicial Council of Judges which does not respond to their legal mail) you will save me time in having the Provincial Court advising me of your original standing and thus having to write twice which I do in any event.

Yours truly, Roger Callow  self-represented Respondent.

cc Andrew Coyne (Globe& Mail) Mark Bonokoski / Tarek Fatah (Ottawa Sun) Kelly Egan (Ottawa Citizen) Ellie Tesher (The Star) J. Ivison / C. Selby (National Post)CAVANAGH LLP

 

FEB 02   rogercallow.com MEDIA feb.  (Jan. 27-2021 CBC article.

 

CBC's senior correspondent, Neil MacDonald commenting on Hassan Diab Case (deported by Ottawa Justice Robert Maranger in 2014 on highly suspect evidence. I had this same dude. Both Diab & I lost to a 3 person Appeal Court in separate courtrooms on the same day (All Appeal Courts are political courts. They ruled the way the Harper gov't wanted them to rule.)

 

But I do know this: I don't trust my government. I don't trust Canadian police, and I don't trust our prosecutors....

 

I say this not as a right-wing militia member or conspiracy theorist. I say it as a journalist with 42 years on the job. I have seen what our legal system is capable of doing to an ordinary citizen, and it is frightening. If you don't believe that, well, let's just hope you never have your unshakeable patriotic faith tested.

 

I've had doubts about journalism's embrace of prosecutors and law enforcement since I was a junior police reporter in the late-'70s. A fair number of the police I dealt with back then were deeply misogynist, thoroughly homophobic, and, in many cases, plain racist. Some were absolutely brutal. The prosecutors with whom they worked weren't always very bright, either.

And yet I was expected, when someone was charged with a crime, to respectfully quote these characters, and even describe some of the evidence — never exculpatory, of course — without ever asking the accused person for his or her side of the story, which you would think basic journalism demands.

 

MEDIA - FEBRUARY 01, 2021

FEB.01 (follows on Newsletter Jan.15-2021 MEDIA

NEWSLETTER

POST IN STAFFROOM -locate an 'influencer' (cc U.S. Embassy / Deputy PM Freeland -Ottawa)

BY: Roger Callow  rcallow770@gmail.com  rogercallow.com   The Employer won, I didn't nor did 37 million Canadians when they lost Justice Canada due to its systemic malfeasance = destruction of democratic Canada in totality. The last Act is slated in an Ottawa courtroom on Feb. 11-2021.

 As Trump did not see the threat to U.S. interests, perhaps President  Biden will.

cc Andrew Coyne (Globe& Mail) Mark Bonokoski / Tarek Fatah (Ottawa Sun) Kelly Egan (Ottawa Citizen) Ellie Tesher (The Star) J. Ivison / C. Selby (National Post)

The only answer is what one sees around the world...hit the streets but please, no violence to people

 

THE THREAT  (Due to its significance, this passage is repeated from Jan. 15-2021 Newsletter

 It's the algorithm, stupid, not the people. Canadians are so caught up with the conspiracy against Roger Callow, that they do not perceive the real threat; namely, the algorithm which Franco Alulio, Deputy Minister of Transport-Medical in Ontario set up by which a targeted individual such as myself can be deprived of all legal representation for any matter due to his bogus driver license suspension. Hence removal of anyone in any form such as a trial associated with this stunt; namely, Alulio, myself, the judges, the 'Bobbsey Twin' lawyers with the last act slated for Feb. 11-2021 where I am the Respondent, or other conspirators is immaterial. The only way to defeat this algorithm is 1)expose the perfidy of Alulio publicly and 2)charge him criminally with a 20 year sentence held over his head. Otherwise, COVID 19 will look like child's play if this algorithm grows beyond Alulio. Time is running out fast. The U.S., in the absence of Canadians, are you listening?  Ailing Sun Media columnist, Mark Bonokoski, was charged by me with exposing the national boycott of the Employee's Case over a year ago and is now appointed as the point man for the media on Feb. 11-2021 which is really what this trial is about; the demise of the Canadian media. 'Canada has a Legal System; not a Justice System' explaining why I have requested the U.S. Embassy (Ottawa) to be a 'friend of Roger Callow' and attend the Feb. 11 hearing which I hope to attend by teleconferencing which I have used successfully in the past.

 

JAN.16-2021 MEDIA COVID - A NEW ALGORITHM

1) The old algorithm for COVID control may best be described as 'hygiene theatre' in which the collapse of social trust focuses on the role played by gov't. in that failure leaving the public confused as to which 'expert' to follow as myriad approaches abound.

7) And yet another 'disaster management model' algorithm would study the inter connectedness approach. In short, according to this paradigm, we used the wrong algorithm and continue to do so in all provinces: 'Health professionals have no capability of understanding and no training to understand the power of the grid, the water supply system, the cattle industry, the pork and beef industry, the oil and gas industry...Why would they? That's not their job'.  For example Maple Leaf Foods spent $20 million tracing an outbreak of listeriosis a few years back. The problem? Two infected cutting machines = sanitation problem as opposed to a strict medical problem although doctors treated infected patients. The wrong algorithm may also have been used regarding the role of COVID and hard surfaces where COVID rapidly dies.

 

EPOCH TIMES

When I dropped the EPOCH TIMES  almost 3 years ago, I noted the hypocrisy of this Newspaper wishing to use Canada, one and at the same time, to front for its exposure of the anti-CCP but failing in turn to expose the malfeasance of the Canadian Justice System.

 

APRIL 25-2018

TO: newsdesk@epochtimes.com  ATTN: Cindy Gu    FROM: Roger Callow aka 'The Outlawed Canadian' 

QUOTES:  A) ...Trump said to describe The Epoch Times as 'most credible newspaper'. It's the only (newpaper) he trusts U.S. Senate candidate Paul Taylor E.C. Apr.20-26 p.1 ....

 

C) ACTION CALLED FOR

     Will the Epoch Times publish an article exposing the national perfidy of Canadian government, law courts, and media on an issue which every Canadian should be cognizant as well as international investors?

'The Outlawed Canadian in an outlaw Government and Judiciary due to systematic malfeasance in an unresolved labour issue where no compensation has been paid places Canada on a scale hitherto unknown in any democracy. Even Dante placed those whom should have acted but didn't, in the lowest rung of Hell. How about it, Epoch Times?   cc U.S. Embassy

 

Jan. 18-2021

TO: Cindy Gu  - Publisher      FROM: Roger Callow

     As a former subscriber, I dropped your newspaper when it refused to break the

employeescasescanada.ca  national debacle.

Now look where this issue has gone. (SEE NEWSLETTER  JAN.15-2021 enclosed)

 

MESSAGE:

1) Q. Considering that the measure of the courts, the gov't, the employer (West Vancouver School Board), the terminated employee, senior teacher Roger Callow in a bogus arbitration followed by 35 years of inconsequential court hearings across Canada before over 50 judges, what is being evaluated on Feb. 11-2021? ANS. the media for there can be no democracy without an efficacious media which Canada currently goes without. The only reason as to why I am attending considering I unofficially ended my unsuccessful bid for compensation, is because I have been made a Respondent by the two 'highly compromised 'Bobbsey Twins'; two young lawyers who think nothing of trampling over the courts...and getting away with it. I have asked for a trusteeship to be placed over the Ottawa Courts as by extension no judicial Decision in Canada has any validity. (SEE additional website: employeescasecanada.ca) Unfortunately, Canada's leading politician, Chrystia Freeland, has no answer as she has no comprehension of the problem. Hopefully President Biden will act by insisting that all disputes - diplomatic and commercial - be settled in U.S. courts until the Franco Alulio algorithm is dealt with.

 

2) PROGNOSIS for Feb. 11-2021: It will be written by the Justice Ministry by Feb.01 after ensuring that the Media will not be in attendance. The expected outcome by the Bobbsey Twins is to erase separate charges of fraud against the two Bobbsey Twins who will expect 'to walk' even enriching themselves at my personal expense. While insisting on teleconferencing, if past patterns apply, the court will not telephone me. This case also has as an objective to exonerate all previous judicial actions by the Employer by ghosting such as the heinous Alulio algorithm trusting that 'Sleepy Joe' will indeed be asleep at the switch in the U.S. with, hopefully, no action from un-President Trump perhaps awakening him.