MEDIA apr

 

April 23-2021

TO: Judicial Council (ON) Postal Station 31 Box 914 Adelaide St. E Toronto ON M5C 2K3

FROM: Roger Callow (private party) #2001-1285 Cahill Drive, Ottawa, ON K1V 9A7

e-mail: thecallows@gmail.com  MEDIA apr 23-2021

 

REFERENCE: Complaint against Ottawa Justice Kristin Muszynski(M) CV 84983(0) H.D. Apr. 08

Bissionnette (B) (esq.) APPLICANT v. Callow RESPONDENT  (DECISION: APRIL 15-2021)

 

MESSAGE: (Background)

1) This complaint functions on many levels as the 9-page Decision delivered by M. on April 15 reflects a conspiracy on many levels including elements within the Ottawa Court Registry over which I am on record as calling for a Trusteeship, whatever form that might take.

2) The above case was originally based on #82943 wherein I laid separate fraud charges against B with more serious charges against Ken Dixon esq. of Cavanagh LLP representing him.

M. made no mention of Dixon in her Decision. As framed, the two 'Bobbsey Twins' (internet label) were to explain their actions against which they called this Plaintiff frivolous & vexatious.

3) This is the second time this case has been inverted (the first time in 2014 in ON) in an unresolved hearing for a number of reasons detailed in information provided to the court by Cavanagh LLP in a 107 page Exhibit of all my material on the subject since 1985, the date of my illicit teacher lay-off in West Vancouver, B.C. No compensation has been paid in an unresolved legal matter due to the malfeasance of over 50 judges across Canada who truncated a court ordered retrial.

4) In this second instance, the inversion takes the form in which the question of this litigant Respondent being frivolous & vexatious becomes paramount with the fraud charges made secondary. Even here, the fraud charge on B was sidetracked to another venue by M.

 

QUESTIONS TO BE RAISED

5) The action as originally written by Cavanagh LLP read CV20-849830-0000 ; the four '0's at the end denoting electronic filing. There is no restructuring of this case as the Ottawa Registry sought to do dropping the '0' after the '3' without going through a formal process which the court did not do. That action implying collusion should be sufficient to nullify this judgment.

6) Further, I asked for, but did not get the 'bona fides' of these two lawyers who do not appear to have been called to the bar. Dixon apparently knows his way around the courts as illustrated  by his surreptitious approach to Master Kavanagh without my knowledge who, rather than putting a flea in his ear, even acquired a Court file number to unitarily respond in a Decision to him. Dixon, I submit,  should be suspended until a proper examination is held.

7) Complicating this entire episode is the failure of M to provide a court Order to the ON Legal Society (not known to answer their legal mail) in which the malfeasance of the two Bobbsey Twins is detailed. That detail was provided to M as noted above by the Applicant so that she was cognizant of the claim details. That omission on her part should lead to a suspension of all legal duties for her until a proper enquiry is held.

 

CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTIONS

8) M perverted dialogue at the beginning of the hearing - ZOOM by the Applicant and telephone conferencing by me. Technical problems, possibly due to mixing the two styles of court access, meant that while I heard the  Applicant Dixon on ZOOM, I could not hear court responses hence I invited the court to handle everything on a written 'party by party' basis consistent with most courts but not, apparently, that of M. As it was, Dixon spent 20 minutes doing 'lord knows what' on a discussion of 'all issues' which appears to boil down to one issue; namely, the Respondent is being frivolous & vexatious on everything dating from 1985. M merely regurgitates this phrase from over 50 other judges across Canada in this unresolved legal matter. In 2017, I unsuccessfully raised the Constitutional Question in N.S. apart from the labour issue regarding unresolved cases which I likened to the judges picking up the judicial ball and going home before a Decision is delivered.

9) A far more egregious constitutional question with not only personal ramifications to this Respondent, but a threat to the entire world's driving public, is the Franco Alulio algorithm in which this rogue civil servant perverted the Driver license forms of the Ministry of Transport-Medical  (SEE website rogercallow.com APRIL Sub-headings e.g. Identity Theft ) in which my identity is affixed in a most significant fashion and is a key factor in the April 08 H.D. which M. did not accept misdirecting her response in that regard, in my opinion.

10) In brief, beyond suspending a driver's license 'for reasons best known to himself' Alulio perverted the forms in such fashion that I may not access any legal firm for any legal matter losing, in that context, the one lawyer I had. There was no response from the Governor General under 'we, the people' which I had asked to be a 'friend of Roger Callow' in court. I would have no trouble giving written responses to the court later as a witness which should have resolved the immediate question. Regrettably, similar to the ON Legal Society being AWOL, the GG did not respond on this all important question. The Ottawa Registry refuse to give me a date for the $10 million action which I laid against Alulio to which he does not respond. This issue is at the forefront all other issues being the progenitor of those issues since Oct. 2019. As with all other issues, M ducked out leaving the most heinous crime for a democracy since Nazi Eichmann's 'Final Solution' in 1942 depriving whole groups of people of their identity. For this, I submit both Alulio and Muszynski be charged with TREASON whatever legal format that might take. (SEE Sub-heading under website rogercallow.com APRIL

 

RAMIFICATIONS

11) The media and Deputy Minister, Chrystia Freeland, Canada's foremost politician and a symbol of all politicians on this issue, are AWOL leaving Canada and Canadians in freefall.

12) U.S. professor & SUN columnist, VD HANSON, is now the international  'point man' on this Alulio algorithm in which all those dealing with Canadian Courts on either a diplomatic or commercial level have every right to be forewarned.

13) As to Oversight bodies of any stripe, they are run by bureaucrats supporting 'the big guy'.

 

Yours truly, Roger Callow under the 'faint hope clause' typical for long term prisoners with this difference...I am innocent of whatever conspiracy was mounted against me; the courts said as much in 1986. But tell that to such as Muszynski j. 

 

cc U.S. Professor V.D. Hanson (columnist in SUN) as the international 'point man' on a story of judicial malfeasance on a level unheard for any democracy

 

April 19-2021

TO: Law Society of Ontario / Osgoode Hall, 130 Queen Street West / Toronto, ON M5H 2N6

FROM: Roger Callow 2001-1285 Cahill Dr. Ottawa, ON K1V 9A7  t.613-521-1739 website: rogercallow.com 2021 APRIL  MEDIAapr 19 2 pages 

encl. 2-page NEWSLETTER: APRIL 16-2021

REFERENCE: Ottawa Court vertical hearing CV20-84983 H.D. Apr. 11-2021 DECISION (9 pages): Kristin Muszynski j. (M)

 

MESSAGE: This Letter is based on two sections of M's Decision: (30) and (29) with my RESPONSE (R)

1) (30) I similarly find it appropriate to make an order requiring Mr. Callow provide a copy of these reasons for decision, along with a copy of my order, to any administrative body or appellate court to which he intends to initiate or continue a complaint or proceeding. (R) This Decision was so contumacious that even the judge had to write into the proceedings a 'help, this judge needs back-up' provisions.

2) (29) There is at least one live Ontario action, that being Mr. Callow's claim against (lawyer) Mr. Bissionnette (B)(court File No. CV20-82889). The applicant submits that I should dismiss that action outright at this stage (my underlining). I decline to do so. The action against Mr. B. was subject to a prior Rule 2.1 request which was refused. (by whom and when?) While it is quite possible that the action would be dismissed at a pleadings motion or a summary judgment motion, no such motion is before me. (a preposterous assertion even based on the applicant's factum). The appropriate remedy on this application is to stay all litigation commenced by Mr. Callow until such time as Mr. Callow can obtain an order granting him leave to continue same. R. M is merely freezing me out of all ON court proceedings (which I was in the process of deserting in any event by continuing my attack on the Franco Alulio algorithm apart from ON law courts. I dropped the case against B. and Ken Dixon, his lawyer of Cavanagh LLP, whom I also lodged a separate complaint of fraud which reaches right up into the Ontario Courts where I am on record of calling for a Trusteeship to be invoked although by whom and under which rules is not clear. The whole caper is listed under TREASON on my website: rogercallow.com In bottom line language, this badly flawed Hearing was redundant but has now opened a 'can of worms' focusing on the ON. Legal Society's failure to investigate separate charges of fraud against B. and Dixon in pursuing this case. I will now turn to that failure.

3) Considering that one week before the Hearing, the Applicant filed 107 pages of my material detailing the history of my claim since my illicit senior teacher lay-off in 1985 in West Vancouver, B.C. under the neophyte BILL 35 (B.C. 1985) used only against this teacher before it was rescinded = banana republic law. The matter of compensation (now includes pension rights) has never been resolved as nothing has been paid due to the chicanery of over 50 judges as noted in many NEWSLETTERS. Where referred to in her aberrant Decision, M knowingly perverts that information. The B.C. court in quashing the arbitration, ordered further litigation much like M. supposedly does here.

4) The material provided to the ON Legal Society on the alleged fraud by the two named lawyers above was before her in the 107 pages which she did not comment on nor make a court order for the ON Legal Society to produce their Report on the two. That is a major omission.

5) Even more significantly, she deliberately misconstrued my 'identity theft' by which I could not have a lawyer represent me in court. (My request to the Governor General to represent me under these most unusual circumstances of 'we, the people' fell on deaf ears hence my request to conduct everything on a written basis where I could respond as a witness. In short, I could sit on her Decision before it was published...and that would never do in this conspiracy.

6) Whether CV20-82849 which I laid and later withdrew in Feb. 2021 or CV20-84983(0) which the Defendants inverted to become the applicants; the issue was the same; namely, the alleged fraud of the two  lawyers. M failed completely by not commenting directly on that fact in her Decision. It is a waste of time referring her to judicial oversight bodies as they are MIA on many such complaints which I have filed in the past; particularly for judges with an original appointment to the bench as Federal judges. The Ottawa Courts are infested with this type.

7) Hence my belated request for the ON Legal Society, in the absence of a court order or evaluation, to conduct the necessary investigation of the two lawyers named above. Duck this request once again, and the ON Legal Society should close its doors forever. So should the media if they do not report on this letter including my website address in any such publicized accounts. Turning to other provinces has not been ruled out by me.

SUPPOSITION

8) M badly needs Appeal Court support for her atrocious action but the point here is that she cannot expect me to appeal (SEE DUNDERHEADS under MEDIAapr where only one of the 3 judges is 'operant'). This where the Applicant can be of service in appealing the Decision as the only viable way to lift B's fraud charge (Dixon is not mentioned here as his perfidy is to be ghosted). With two court Decisions under her belt, M hopes to, one and at the same time, consolidate her gains while freezing me out of future ON court proceedings. That can only happen if the ON Legal Society plays their part in this conspiracy by continuing to refuse to 'do their job' as opposed to 'running a job'. In brief, its entire credibility is at stake with this submission.

 

Faithfully rendered, Roger Callow (self-represented) Amour de cosmos but not Canada.

 

cc U.S. professor V.D. Hanson  international 'point man' in this war on 'identity theft'. U.S., are you listening to this 'clear & present danger' from north of your border? I hope so. Identity theft is a very serious matter for any country.

 

 

NEWSLETTER - APRIL 16 (MEDIA apr) based on APR. 10 NEWSLETTER (2 pages)

SEE rogercallow.com 2021 APRIL Sub-heading TREASON for full account

 

    

NEWSLETTER - APRIL 10, 2021 (2 pages) MEDIA apr

POST IN STAFFROOM email colleagues

BACKGROUND:  (see NEWSLETTERS:  March 01,15, 16-2021 (MEDIA mar) plus APRIL 08 Sub-heading

BY: Roger Callow  rogercallow.com (2021)  'KING OF THE WHISTLEBLOWERS' ...Time to end this 35 year unresolved Judicial farce, the employeescasecanada.ca  which I did on  DEC. 31-2020. The Employer won, I didn't nor did 38 million Canadians when they lost Justice Canada due to systemic malfeasance = destruction of democratic Canada in its totality...The only answer is what one sees around the world...hit the streets but please, no violence to people. It is a waste of time voting under these circumstances in Canada.

THE THREAT (SEE Mar. 01 Newsletter for complete details)

 It's the algorithm, stupid, not the people... Canadians are so caught up with the conspiracy against Roger Callow, that they do not perceive the real threat; namely, the algorithm which Franco Alulio, Deputy Minister of Transport-Medical in Ontario set up by which a targeted individual such as myself can be deprived of all legal representation for any matter due to his bogus driver license suspension.... failure of the media to expose the Franco Alulio story ranks right up there with the biggest abuse in Canadian society on a par with what happened in Nazi Germany's 'Final Solution'. A. Eichmann; move over.

THE PRESENT (#2-4 from Mar. 01 Newsletter)

...2) Until the question of my 'existence' is remedied by the Supreme Court of Canada (Under Section 140, they can hear anything of a national concern and my suit against Alulio CV20-82943 hits right at the core of this miscarriage of justice under Ottawa Justice Pierre Roger (who pulled a bunker leaving Justice Kristin Muszynski to carry the can on APR. 08 ) whose recusal I have called for. He would seek to eradicate previous matters under 'all issues' (CV20-82943) without defining any one issue in CV20-849830 on Apr. 8-2021 where I am accused of being a frivolous & vexatious  Respondent.

MY BOTTOM LINE (APRIL 16-2021)

The Message from the authorities is clear. We have all the power, Mr. Callow. You have none; it's a truism common to the world but people in other countries risk their lives for what they believe in. Not so Canada. That is what makes us political cowards. There is nowhere in Canada to appeal. Deputy Minister Chrystia Freeland is the symbol of all other political M.P. and MMP eunuchs. The media with its midwits has sold out on this issue which is why I insist that my website address: rogercallow.com appear in all articles. I will continue to battle the Franco Alulio Algorithm apart from the law courts but that would seem to lie with street protesters: PLACARD: JUSTICE FOR CDN. ROGER CALLOW. Of course it goes without saying, that Kristin Muszynski j. becomes the poster child of legal chicanery without equal in Canada. Maybe she is what Canadians deserve to have as a judge considering the silence the Employee's Case has engendered from all quarters. And the real joker? I had already voluntarily closed down the Employee's Case as of Dec. 31-2020 as I did not want defiance to become denial in my remaining years (79). I even dropped the case against the Bobbsey Twins in Feb. telling both the judge and the two lawyers that there would be no repercussions from me. Hence the hearing above was redundant...but then I always figured Canada and Canadians were ruled by idiots. Now a whole new can of worms has been opened. Move to the front of the class, M. This time, the battle will be on my home turf of the internet which, no doubt, is the next thing that the Justice System would seek to control to parallel the gov'ts. Bill C10. Gee, just like China.

 

Respectfully submitted,  Roger Callow  Amour de cosmos but not Canada

 

cc U.S. Professor V.D. Hanson - SUN columnist and now, the international 'point man' for the Franco Alulio algorithm.

 

 

NEWSLETTER - APRIL 10, 2021 (2 pages) MEDIA apr

POST IN STAFFROOM email colleagues

 

BACKGROUND:  (see NEWSLETTERS:  March 01,15, 16-2021 (MEDIA mar) plus APRIL 08 Sub-heading

BY: Roger Callow  rogercallow.com (2021)  'KING OF THE WHISTLEBLOWERS' ...Time to end this 35 year unresolved Judicial farce, the employeescasecanada.ca  which I did on  DEC. 31-2020. The Employer won, I didn't nor did 38 million Canadians when they lost Justice Canada due to systemic malfeasance = destruction of democratic Canada in its totality...The only answer is what one sees around the world...hit the streets but please, no violence to people. It is a waste of time voting under these circumstances in Canada.

THE THREAT (SEE Mar. 01 Newsletter for complete details)

 It's the algorithm, stupid, not the people... Canadians are so caught up with the conspiracy against Roger Callow, that they do not perceive the real threat; namely, the algorithm which Franco Alulio, Deputy Minister of Transport-Medical in Ontario set up by which a targeted individual such as myself can be deprived of all legal representation for any matter due to his bogus driver license suspension.... failure of the media to expose the Franco Alulio story ranks right up there with the biggest abuse in Canadian society on a par with what happened in Nazi Germany's 'Final Solution'. A. Eichmann; move over.

THE PRESENT (#2-4 from Mar. 01 Newsletter)

...2) Until the question of my 'existence' is remedied by the Supreme Court of Canada (Under Section 140, they can hear anything of a national concern and my suit against Alulio CV20-82943 hits right at the core of this miscarriage of justice under Ottawa Justice Pierre Roger (who pulled a bunker leaving Justice Kristin Muszynski to carry the can on APR. 08 ) whose recusal I have called for. He would seek to eradicate previous matters under 'all issues' (CV20-82943) without defining any one issue in CV20-849830 on Apr. 8-2021 where I am accused of being a frivolous & vexatious  Respondent.

 

MESSAGE:  rogercallow.com

APR 10 A) For a literal account of 'APR 08' court H.D., see EMPLOYEE'S CASE SUMMARY ; for a philosophical approach; EMPLOYEE'S CASE - SERENDIPITY  B)'Oh, what a tangled web we weave...' It is the nature of conspiracies to 'damn the torpedoes' as there is no Plan 'B'. If one did exist, the conspirators should have departed CV20-849830 (Apr. 08 H.D.) after I dropped all pursuit of the Employee's Case in the law courts by Dec. 31-2020 as the corrupt Ottawa courts would not give me court time on any of my filed claims. Plan 'A'? Oh, that was to 'get Callow' at any costs dating from 1985...and it cost Canada its democracy = Third World Country. After Dec. 31-2020, my intention was to pursue the 2019 Franco Alulio algorithm with its fake driver license scam apart from the courts which I will now do = courts superfluous. The Applicant, by insisting on dealing 'with all issues' in CV20-849830 without defining even one, now makes the court the focal point of this controversy with the litigants being mere bystanders = total collapse of the Justice System. There is no meaningful way out as 'ghosting' all issues ruling this Respondent to be 'frivolous & vexatious' may put an end to my legalities (which I had done in any event) leaving the court to explain to gov't. and country why they gave de facto recognition to the most heinous piece of action in the history of Canada paralleling Eichmann's 'Final Solution', in terms of the F.A. algorithm. Under those circumstances, it is now an Open Door policy for rogue Cdn. civil servants in league with the necessary corrupt leaders on any action; if M. does not step in = bedlam. C) In 1986, Justice Mary Southin called for all material regarding my lay-off from both the Union and the Employer. The Employer obliged by providing her with the second illegal dismissal hearing notes of July, 1985 where School Board Counsel committed fraud. Southin, not realizing that she was in a blackmail position, returned all files to both Parties (the Union grabbed my copy) 'as she did not use them' as opposed to charging Board Counsel with fraud. That failure was exploited by Board Counsel so that Southin was left on the defensive turning to cover-up at my expense; a situation which in turn was reinforced by over 50 judges to the current time. To produce this disclosure from 1985 would be a defeat not only for Southin (retired 2004) but for over 50 judges who conspired to cover-up the cover-up. The Bobbsey Twins are pulling the same routine, for after the Ottawa Courts frustrated the inclusion of my evidence, the Bobbsey Twins turned around and gratuitously provided my entire file illustrating fraud to the court (SEE EC SUMMARY above) thus provoking the court to ape Southin...or so they hope. That's why Rogers j. 'got out of Dodge'. leaving stand-in judge Kristin Muszynski (M) to take the flak. Her Decision is due next week and promises to be the Decision of the century, no matter which way she goes. Whatever options M has, they are all bad ones. In brief, the situation faced by (M) is this. If fraud is shown, everything emanating from it is null and void. That is why the 1986 Board notes are kept from me although M could order them up under disclosure rules. That situation does not apply to Apr. 08 H.D. as the Bobbsey Twins Applicant has gratuitously entered my entire file illustrating fraud for all to see thus frustrating the Ottawa Registry trying to block that evidence . Hence M. is in an impossible position. After WWII, the term 'Oh, you Quisling' (traitor) named after the WWII Norwegian Nazi leader, was a common epithet in 1950's Canada. That can easily become 'Oh, you Muszynski' in 2021.' More on this point after I see her written Decision.

 

Yours truly, (Roger Callow) Amour de cosmos  but not Canada.

 

cc Deputy Minister Chrystia Freeland

cc SUN columnists: A. Furey / L. Gunter / V.D. Hanson (U.S. Professor now the 'point man' internationally for the Franco Alulio algorithm)

 

APR. 11

Dunderheads

1) Dunderheads are those judges whose future is expendable by senior judges; one being such as Justice Kristin Muszynski (M) who was jetted in on Apr. 08 with only 2 days pre-warning on this major CV20-849830 in which she initially planned to bring in a Decision by the end of the Day but backed off at the last minute.

2) Hence dunderheads have a useful purpose for the courts as long as they are kept on a tight leash which Rogers j. obviously thought was the case for M. but she has delayed her Decision until next week giving me the opportunity to expose a conspiracy without equal (SEE above). M. had no good options once she accepted this case but not bringing in an immediate Decision may very well have been the worst possible option available. Even the inexperienced Applicant Bobbsey Twins Applicant must be laughing at her. In brief, they kept moving everything sideways in one direction until they suddenly reversed course with the filing of my material at the last minute thus severely embarrassing the court...dunderheads indeed....

3) The Justice System is not immune to rewarding dunderheads financially by giving them token appointments to Appeal Courts which are presided over by a leading judge with but one instruction to the dunderheads; namely, keep your trap shut. I have a number of anecdotes on this level but one will suffice. In 2014 in an ON Appeal Court, I called out one older dunderhead for falling asleep during the brief one hour hearing much to the amusement of the other dunderhead but the leading judge was 'not amused'. Family and friends of course believe the dunderhead is being promoted when the exact opposite is the case.

4) A few years ago in the QC version of this case in Gatineau, the hearing judge was distressed to such an extent that; not wishing to be treated as a dunderhead, refused to write a Decision leaving it to a Chief Justice of the court to write the Decision leaving the impression that the cj was the hearing judge. No mention was made of the other judge in his written Decision. When that matter was appealed in what I labeled 'Lavery de Billy tail wags QC judicial dog'; the court was quite verbal in its denunciation of my bravado in daring to challenge this lower court piece of chicanery. Technically, I am still waiting for the Gatineau hearing judge to deliver his Decision.

5) I have already called out for a Royal Commission to Deputy Minister Chrystia Freeland based on all issues as defined by my material entered into evidence by Cavanagh LLP in CV20-849830 Apr. 08 H.D. No other politician nor media midwits have opened their trap.

6) As to the Franco Alulio algorithm, I have now appointed U.S. professor published in the Ottawa SUN to officially sponsor an international challenge to this Adolf Eichmann 'Final Solution' type scam. All international interests should be warned of the compromised situation of dealing with any Canadian court on any basis. If the slogan goes; 'Buyer Beware'; the slogan here is for any litigant in a Canadian action should be 'Litigant Beware' particularly if one is 'the little guy'. My PLACARD since 2004 says it best: STAY OUT OF A CANADIAN COURTROOM UNLESS YOU FIRST BUY THE JUDGE.

 

rogercallow.com MEDIA apr

cc 'The usual'