'FEB. 11' THE CONCLUSION

 

FEB.11

FEBRUARY 11-2021   CHRYSTIA FREELAND - part II

TO: Chrystia Freeland - Deputy P.M.    FROM: Roger Callow  Plaintiff  in many legal cases      

by fax: 613-996-9607  PAGES 4          rogercallow.com  (Sub-heading) FEB 11 THE CONCLUSION

(includes 3pge. Justice Roger comments from 'Feb. 11' to Freeland only CV20-849830)          

                                                             

QUOTE:  When the institutions of a society deteriorate, a society dies. 'city guru' Jane Jacobs

MESSAGE:

1) This account is in addition to the letter of January 06 (rogercallow.com CHRYSTIA FREELAND Sub-heading) showing that Deputy Minister, Chrystia Freeland, Canada's foremost politician and possibly next P.M. is 'a part of the problem' regarding Canada's past and future well-being as opposed to the solution. Through her in the microcosm is seen the condemnation of all politicians in the macrocosm who evade central issues such as the one labeled the Employee's Case; the 35 year unresolved labour matter where no compensation has been paid.

2) 'FEB. 11' in an Ottawa Court Case held by bastardized vertical procedures is reflective of why I have called for a Trusteeship over this despicable Court which, in actuality, is symbolic of the decay focused in Canada through your personage for all politicians. The actual case has no merit as it is a repeat of the failed ON stunt pulled in 2014 by the West Vancouver School Board in 1985 which set the precedent that a powerful Employer may escape paying compensation to dismissed employees complete with recall rights bitched by over 50 judges in all provinces-except NL- in Canada, through their illicit connections. (Actually, I was 'laid off' under the imposed BILL 35 (B.C. 1985) the only teacher so affected before the Bill was withdrawn with this case still before the courts = Banana Republic Justice. Hence I am still an employee of the Board, albeit an unpaid one = $20 million settlement fee) Here's what the North Shore News had to say:

Get This Straight(c. 1986)
'...The teacher who was dumped was Roger Callow, and his dismissal (whatever happened to 'lay-off with recall rights'?) will go into the history books along with other great happenings like the invention of the steam engine and the telephone.' (you may yet be right here, Doug)'...Can you remember any other teacher being shown the door for incompetence?...The revolutionary heave-ho of which I speak became possible because the Socreds have brought in BILL 35 (dead on, Doug)...As far as Mr. Callow is concerned, I cannot say whether he is in fact incompetent...(Why not? You did everywhere else in your diatribe)...Enter Mrs. Margot Furk, the schoolboard woman from West Vancouver who looks meek, but isn't...(she looks about as meek as Attila the Hun...and to think Dougy was also criticized for being anti-female) She was one of the leading lobbyists for BILL 35 (Don't forget the role of John Reynolds, local MPP now the federal justice critic for the Reform Party for Christ's sake!) and voted for Callow's removal...'How was it possible, I asked her, that a man who had been employed for 17 years could be incompetent?' "Because in the past no one had the guts to do anything about him," she added smartly...UP THE REVOLUTION' (I'll try, Doug, I'll try...but it seems the revolution has already hoisted you on your own petard and from the sounds of your squealing, you don't like walking the proverbial mile in my boots...Oh, well, I think those boots are far too big for you anyway...so, Doug...enjoy, enjoy the revolutionary heave ho....

In brief, I was the target of a set-up which ultimately led to the demise of the credibility of the Cdn. Justice System with related institutions and hence the loss of Canada as a nation. I call it

Institutional Autism where institutions speak only to other institutions thus making a mockery of our Charter of Rights and Freedoms for individuals.

THE FUTURE

3) There isn't any, particularly for those people who still believe in the vote. For those who question voting in Canada under these circumstances, one option, which applies to the U.S. as well, is to consider the 14th Colony protocol in which the U.S. permits Canada to join as a U.S. state. In brief, the obsolete BNA Act of 1867 plus precedent law is too unwieldy for Canada to function smoothly any longer. By becoming a U.S. state, Canadians get to revise their gov't. in terms of a Governor and his Council. Miscreant judges, for example, do not go to jail in Canada where the Legal Fraternity is the strongest Union which 'protects its own'.They do in the U.S.

The U.S. has a different perspective on this Protocol; namely, Canada is its northern military flank. Even the Netherlands has a bigger Navy than Canada.

4) The one thing in which both the U.S. and Canada have a vital common interest lies in the Franco Alulio algorithm whereby this Ontario bureaucrat, for reasons best known to himself, perverted the driver license suspension forms in such fashion that this target was robbed of any access to a lawyer for any legal purpose. All drivers in N. America are vulnerable to this Nazi-like scheme which could easily become an Organized Crime 'cottage industry' in both countries. To that extent, Chrystia Freeland's silence on this paramount issue is a personal indictment of everything she stands for. I call for all protesters across North America to add this Placard to their street demonstrations as a consequence: JUSTICE FOR ROGER CALLOW

5) Then what was the purpose of 'FEB. 11' other than the legal issues involved? The media. No democratic nation can exist without a viable media. By ghosting the national issue of the Employees Case, the Cdn. Media has shot their credibility down the crapper forever. CBC and Postmedia now depend on gov't hand-outs in a losing bid to stay afloat. There will be no tears from me when they go to their ultimate destination although I will miss the comic strips. FEB. 11 came and went with the media holding tight to the bitter end which is now and forever. It no longer matters what they say or do on this issue or any other major issue.

 

Respectfully submitted, Roger Callow  'Amour de Cosmos' former Canadian citizen whose appeal now will be to as yet an un-named Governor General (the last one was a disaster on this issue; see website: employeescasecanada.ca 2016)

 

cc The GANG OF 8 media representatives for all Cdn. media: Andrew Coyne (Globe& Mail) Mark Bonokoski / Tarek Fatah (Ottawa Sun) Kelly Egan (Ottawa Citizen) Ellie Tesher (The Star) J. Ivison / C. Selby (National Post) L.Gunter (SUN - national edition)

cc The U.S. Embassy (Ottawa)  /  U.S. Professor VDH Hanson, particularly on Alulio algorithm

cc Justice Pierre Rogers Hearing judge for CV20-849830 / Cavanagh LLP

 

Justice Pierre Roger, the hearing judge for CV20-849830 is a senior judge in the Ottawa Courts appointed by Peter MacKay in 2015. He was formerly associated with Borden, Ladner, Gervais in Ottawa. His alma mater, Ottawa U. isn't exactly the cadillac of law schools but he has enough experience to spot a scam such as this one in which the conspirators under a blanket ban would seek to ghost such as the Franco Alulio Algorithm which I submit is the main goal here. It is a highly duplicitous action considering that other actions such as the one pending in N.B. naming the B.C. legal outfit for the Employer, Harris & Co. and two SK judges on fraud charges would, presumably, be included under this blanket ban as well as including the highly illicit actions of 4 Ontario judges dating back to 2014  which remain unexamined. In 2014, the court rejected Employer overtones on this level probably for these reasons.

     The correct response for Rogers is to dispense with this case for being overly broad under the banner 'the case lacks merit' which would put an end to all the Employee's Case challenges considering my Dec. 31-2021 volunteer action to drop any further quest for compensation as I am not going to get it. The only reason that I participate in Feb.11 is that I am the Respondent

     Depending on Roger's action which, should it go ahead, I have invited him to ask written questions of both sides in a case to be handled on a 'written party by party basis'. Should he give the Applicants what they want without question, I will not refer Rogers j. to the oversight bodies or to a 'political' Appeal Court; rather, I will challenge him to the new Governor General requesting that he be relieved of all activities related to the Canadian Justice System. The Franco Alulio algorithm is too dangerous to be sloughed off this way.

     As to Dixon asking this Applicant to sit on a phone line for 5 hours plus while he sits around the courts; that is not on my program. A few years back in Gatineau, I sat around a court along with other dunderhead lawyers for this is where the big outfits send them on minor cases hoping to charge later on a 'win'. The dunderheads are as happy as clams as well knowing the judges are in on this scam. That is why Dixon, if he was serious about this case, would have changed his ZOOM application to one of telephone conferencing where the court, when ready, telephone the litigants who are able to go on with other things while waiting. Unfortunately here, stupidity was heaped on stupidity; that is Court nonsense heaped on lawyer nonsense has scuttled today's hearing as any Decision is compromised should the court proceed today. If the matter is not to be dropped, as I recommend, then rebuild the case properly. Rogers j., in summary, should not throw good actions onto a suspect foundation thus drawing into question any judicial conclusion he might draw.

 

Respectfully submitted

 

Roger Callow  FEB.11-2021

 

FEB.11 9 A.M. TO: Cavanagh LLP from Roger Callow  Feb. 11-2021

Feb. 11  4 A.M. CV20-849830  10 A.M. hearing time

1) Thank-you for your reply dated last night  21:26 

2) The key difference between a ZOOM call and teleconferencing is that the Court in league with the sitting judge must agree to this routine. Hence it is not merely a technical difference. The Ottawa Court Registry was notified by me in plenty of time to act but did not hence providing a response to the Registry is superfluous.

3) I will, as earlier stated to you, be available between 10-10:30 for the court to telephone me. I will not contact them under the above noted circumstances.

4) Nor will I contact you in that time period.

5) You may wish to reconsider and drop your case considering that I am not pursuing any aspect of the Employee's Case involving either you or Bissionnette. Of course you have the option of requesting a postponement considering how the courts screwed up here. Further, Justice C. MacLeod has shown that he can fix any problem which ails you such as merely dropping any cases without a hearing as he has already done in this case vis a vis the Ottawa General Hospital.

6) In the event you insist on pursuing this matter, the topic of fraud remains paramount. Disclosure from the ON Legal Society Report on alleged fraud against both of you made by me for separate reasons becomes paramount.

ADDENDUM: As I did not hear from Cavanagh LLP to the above by 9 A.M. to get this matter on track for today, I am requesting through their offices,  considering that the Registry does not provide similar services to me, to enter a 'stay of proceedings' on my behalf until a future date is named by the court. As matters stand, any Decision reached by the court today would be null and void until such time that the court is restructured properly as defined above. Consequently, I will not be available by telephone today. 10 A.M. Dixon never replied to this e-mail  10:20 A.M. Dixon is 'damning the torpedoes' and proceeding, shall I say, regardless. '

 

 4 P.M. 3 page Decision from Justice Pierre Roger which refuses to recognize any other vertical dimension other than ZOOM which I do not have and the court was unwilling to contact me on any level = request for the recusal of Justice Roger through arrangements made by Deputy Minister C. Freeland. (that is, until a new Gov. Gen. is appointed) P.S. Note 3):I was here and there was no phone call from the court at 11:45 A.M. I find Justice Roger to be prejudiced against my interests as outlined in 3).  I cannot trust to this Registry on any level. Either the Registry is misleading the Justice or the Justice is misleading me. Would the newly assigned justice please accept teleconferencing. Immediate attention required as April 8,2021 is the new H.D.  To repeat, my interest does not lie with pursuing these two lawyers. It does lie in the court not ghosting such as the Franco Alulio algorithm.    

 

FEB. 10

N.B. The following is being posted on Feb. 10 for reasons noted below. 4 pages

'FEB. 11-2021' THE CONCLUSION Sub-heading

BY: Roger Callow victim in an unresolved 35 year labour case before over 50 judges across Canada due to Judicial malfeasance on a scale never before witnessed = demise of Canada.

REFERENCE: employeescasecanada.ca up to Dec. 31-2020 / rogercallow.com 2021 onward

CHRONICAL OF EVENTS

1) Delivery in March of 1985 to Deputy Minister of Education, Jim Carter (a former Principal at West Vancouver Secondary and the subject of a similar smear in 1978 against a senior teacher for so-called incompetence (SEE website ref: 'In the beginning') detailed accusations of fraud against replacement Principal, John Williams, who doctored my 'Professional Report on Teacher' changing it from a Positive to a Negative...and I caught him. Principals were part of the Union but separated in 1988 hence this case invited a 'sweetheart deal'.

2) Imposed BILL 35 (think imposed Carbon Tax) passed to lay-off redundant teachers) passed in April by-passing the rancour Carter had experienced in 1978. It was to be effective July 01-1985. No School District that year, including West Van, was in a teacher lay-off position in June of 1985.

3) June 26-1985. Callow was slated for a full load of classes in Sept. until a dismissal notice was delivered (not showing the vote pattern) which had Board Chairman Margo Furk and her Successor, Mike Smith, voting in favour of the dismissal with the other three declining.

4) The thinking for this Board chicanery was that BILL 35 was a 'stand-alone' as opposed to 'in addition' to the School Act; the point being that they knew as the father of two young children, I was not able to finance a challenge to the Board. Bill 35 became law on July 1; my lay-off notice was delivered on June 28-1985. I was to remain on salary until that matter was resolved (currently in 2021, I am technically a WV Board Employee albeit un unpaid one.)

5) However, the Union had widely proclaimed that BILL 35 was the battle of all teachers and hence felt obliged to volunteer to pay for my 11-day arbitration which we lost before a crooked arbitrator, Louis Lindholm, who was adjudged as being  patently unreasonable when I changed lawyers (suspicion of sweetheart deal) with the case being quashed (He had 16 new hires converted to 16 lay-offs including myself as the necessary 17th. No Board Member took the stand to testify to lay-off numbers; in essence, perjure themselves.

6) A second illicit Board meeting was held by their Counsel, Stuart Clyne QC  in July of 1985 where the fraud was compounded. The full Board did not attend and rather than call out those who met for fraud, Justice Southin tried to cover it up in a cover-up which extends to the present day and is at the heart of discovery for all subsequent court cases involving over 50 judges and every province (other than NL) in Canada amid much judicial malfeasance.

7) Highly damaging to my cause was media Reports in the tabloid North Shore News as the media were known to pillory individuals by siding with the powerful employers. (Today, the media has come 180 degrees on that theme but it is too little too late. Under RED NECK NEWS, NSN'S Doug Collins  (with my response never published of course) made the following observations. It's lengthy but provides a perspective as to why the Canadian media is finished:

Get This Straight(c. 1986)
'...The teacher who was dumped was Roger Callow, and his dismissal (whatever happened to 'lay-off with recall rights'?) will go into the history books along with other great happenings like the invention of the steam engine and the telephone.' (you may yet be right here, Doug)'...Can you remember any other teacher being shown the door for incompetence?...The revolutionary heave-ho of which I speak became possible because the Socreds have brought in BILL 35 (dead on, Doug)...As far as Mr. Callow is concerned, I cannot say whether he is in fact incompetent...(Why not? You did everywhere else in your diatribe)...Enter Mrs. Margot Furk, the schoolboard woman from West Vancouver who looks meek, but isn't...(she looks about as meek as Attila the Hun...and to think Dougy was also criticized for being anti-female) She was one of the leading lobbyists for BILL 35 (Don't forget the role of John Reynolds, local MPP now the federal justice critic for the Reform Party for Christ's sake!) and voted for Callow's removal...'How was it possible, I asked her, that a man who had been employed for 17 years could be incompetent?' "Because in the past no one had the guts to do anything about him," she added smartly...UP THE REVOLUTION' (I'll try, Doug, I'll try...but it seems the revolution has already hoisted you on your own petard and from the sounds of your squealing, you don't like walking the proverbial mile in my boots...Oh, well, I think those boots are far too big for you anyway...so, Doug...enjoy, enjoy the revolutionary heave ho....
8) In 1995, as nothing was happening with regards to a court ordered re-arbitration, I went to court requesting that the 'should' return employment to me which has weight in law should be altered to 'must' return employment as the Employer was not actively pursuing re-arbitration.

The only other alternative for Justice Spencer was to order a new arbitration. An experienced labour litigator present at my invitation said 'you are not going to get anywhere with this guy'.

He was right as Spencer tied the case up into so many knots trying to squeeze me out of all compensation; a position accepted by all judges to the present. My Ottawa lawyer in 2003 volunteered this amazing statement in this unresolved matter in a second failed attempt to get a Supreme Court hearing (there were 4 total): 'You have exhausted all remedy under the law.

9) At that point, I turned to the Federal Court and subsequent Provincial Courts across Canada. Those inequities are detailed on my websites as the worst handled legal case in Cdn. Jurisprudence concluding, at my admission on Dec. 31-2020: The Big Employer has won (no compensation ever paid setting a dangerous precedent); I didn't win and 37 million Canadians lost a Justice System = anarchy.

10) The current Case for Feb. 11-2021  is a repeat of 2014 in Ontario where standard legal skulduggery , rather than responding to a legal action, is for the Opposition to launch their own action as Plaintiff in order to control the nature of the question; in this case, to dismiss all previous claims by me across Canada, which they did not get. What they did get, is hard to ascertain as Justice C. McKinnon wrote three different Decisions on the same case, none referencing the other (Would the real Justice McKinnon please stand up?) The Employer's legal representative hastily departed the scene explaining why Premier Ford was unable to funnel this case through a law firm hence the Franco Alulio algorithm which among, other things, deprives a target of any legal representation in any matter. That's why it is a threat to the U.S. driving public. Professor VDH Hanson, my U.S. point man, are you listening? (although anyone can promote this matter on social media).

11) The next step was unexpected; due to the separation of myself in October 2019 from my wife after 45 years of a good marriage, I was left looking for a new Family Doctor as the current one was being inveigled into supporting the Franco Alulio algorithm. That sideshow involved other members of the family plus the police on what led to a 9 day lockdown at the Ottawa General Hospital as their first 'political prisoner' in Xmas 2019. I sued for $10 million  as management were involved in this caper but that Action was lifted by Justice C. MacLeod without taking argument so that now every powerful entity may buy their way out of court hearings altogether. Think SNC Lavalin. Of course the media remained silent on this major transgression. Hence it matters little any longer what they choose to say on anything as their credibility has tanked. FEB. 11  is merely the icing on the cake as my NEWSLETTER  FEB.06 is entitled: CANADA: A NATION OF COWARDS? As of Feb.11, the question mark may be removed. As an addendum, I do not believe it was the intention of the conspirators to involve the Hospital but decided to capitalize upon the problems I already had with family. Fortunately for me, that aspect backfired and has left a big credibility hole with Ottawa General Hospital management. While not liking to do so, nonetheless I felt it necessary to call for a one year donor suspension to this compromised body.

THE FUTURE

12) I believe the future will focus on enacting 'The Fourteenth Colony' protocol in which Canada has an open offer to become an U.S. state ruled by Governor and Council. Accepting that offer is preferable to the U.S. sending in the Marines to protect the northern flank of the U.S. amid Canadian breakdown of its basic institutions which the COVID crisis  has exacerbated

The further advantage to Canada is that the BNA Act is obsolete and we need a new Charter; particularly as the Charter of Rights and Freedoms is moribund.

13) With any question; there are 3 parts: the question to be asked; of whom to ask the question, and actually asking it. Deputy Minister Chrystia Freeland has been targeted in correspondence as Canada's foremost politician which again, have 3 focus points, getting elected, staying elected, and raising money with issues a long distant concern. 'No problem, says the Old Boy's Club; you needn't worry your pretty little head about those matters as we will take care of them for you'. In the 1990's, I spoke to writer, Stevie Cameron, who had just finished a book on P.M. Mulroney, with my challenging offer. 'What's the theme?' she asked.

'The old Boy's Club' I responded. 'Gee, I don't know where to start on that one.' As of Feb. 11, there is no need for any Cdn. writer to respond to that theme as moral COVID has eclipsed the physical type in Canada. We are now a nation in name only.

 

Respectfully submitted, former Canadian born citizen deprived of all basic rights, Roger Callow although I do not know what my new designation is to be...amour de cosmos?


INDIVIDUAL MEDIA CONDEMNATIONS

A) Mark Bonokoski  - for failing to publish the Employee's case on a National level

B) Tarek Fatah          -                                            ditto                                    International level

C) Kelly Egan - for failing to expose the Franco Alulio algorithm

D) Ellie Tesher - for failing to address the topic of National Cowardice

 

OTHERS

E) Chrystia Freeland -representing all politicians in Canada

F) Black Professor U.S. Walter E. Williams (d) U.S. point man on U.S.interests whom I once accused of not perceiving him as one to 'take the bended knee.'

G) White Professor VDH Hanson Both of the above were published in the Ottawa Sun. Hanson is Williams successor. Both of us are students of History with this distinction; I am an activist. Will Hanson find an activist influencer on U.S. interests in this case? That remains to be seen. Anyone is welcome to explore social media platforms.

H) representing now only one of the Presidents -Joe Biden

J) THE GANG OF 8 Andrew Coyne (Globe& Mail) Mark Bonokoski / Tarek Fatah (Ottawa Sun) Kelly Egan (Ottawa Citizen) Ellie Tesher (The Star) J. Ivison / C. Selby (National Post) L.Gunter (SUN - national edition)

 

OTHER CASES OF JUDICIAL ABUSE ABOUND I will limit this record to one such case; the trial of  Vice Admiral Mark Norman, in 2020: 'You are exonerated' lied the judge to Norman one morning when he entered court much to his surprise. No such thing; the case was 'tabled' which meant it could be dealt with at a future date. Hence Norman was screwed in laying any action for false prosecution having to depend, as happened, to a reduced pay-out in which he had to resign first. That little scheme was set up by the prosecution, the judge and his own lawyer, Marie Heinen (she also represents GG Payette along with a former SCofC  Justice) on the day before. I fired a Union lawyer for similar prevarication at my 1985 arbitration; got another lawyer who appealed to court where the arbitration was quashed. Those false words would no sooner be out of the judges mouth in Norman's Case before I would demand clarification after which I would have booted Marie Heinen's duplicitous little ass out of the courtroom-figuratively speaking of course as I do not advocate violence to people; a rider which if Trump had used, there would have been no Second Impeachment process.

 

For the melodramatic; 'good-bye cruel Canada' I no longer love you. We don't have to 'bring in the clowns' in Canada as they are omnipresent    Roger W. Callow