IN APOLOGIA, THE TRANSLATION FROM THIS
PARTICULAR pdf WAS ATROCIOUS
SEE: Oral Argument; a perspective on
CV20-84930
Feb. 11
for a summary of all events
Court File No.
20-00849830-0000
ONTARIO
SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE
BETWEEN: ALEXANDER BISSONNETTE APPLICANT
and
ROGER CALLOW RESPONDENT
SUPPLEMENTARY APPLICATION RECORD
APPLICATION to be
heard April 8, 2021
Date: MARCH 29, 2021 CAVANAGH LLP
400 - 411 Roosevelt Avenue Ottawa ON K2A 3X9
KRISTOPHER L. DIXON LSO no.
Nov. 28-2020
Callow Rebuttal sent to K. Dixon by e-mail
pages Reference: Bissonnette (B) v.Callow CV20-
849830
Callow Response to
e-mail sent by Cavanagh
LLP's Kris Dixon representing B. in
a matter of civil fraud referenced to the
Ontario Legal Society
which does not respond to its legal
mail on this topic and until it does, the above case is stillborn. Regrettably, A.G. Doug Downey, does not respond to
the progenitor case in this matter; namely, the charge of fraud against Deputy
Minister ofTransport - Medical
(my under-lining), Franco Alulio, as your factum
above references this matter of my illicit driver license suspension as being
conducted under the Minister of Transport; an entirely different body with a separate
address and personnel. An honest judge would throw
your factum out on those
grounds alone, but that is the central point, the Ottawa
courts have failed miserably in appointing credible judges to this case
explaining why I petitioned Justice Minister David Lametti to impose
a trusteeship over Ottawa Courts.
As there was no response, copies of my communication are
directed to Chrystia Freeland, Deputy Minister and to Walter E. Williams, U.S. Economics professor
and itinerant columnist
for the Ottawa Sun as Alulio's actions
present a clear and present
danger to the U.S. driving public if this matter is not nipped in the
bud. Alulio did not respond to my $10 million Action
on his perfidy which underlies
all other successive legal cases: CV20-82943
Other points:
1) Your bravado is well rewarded considering your private approach to
Master Kaufman whom, rather than sending you away 'with a flea in your ear';
actually wrote a Decision knowing full well that he was acting in a fraudulent
manner by not notifying me of any hearing.
2) You list my correspondence of March 17, 19, and 26 without
detailing any rebuttal to my very serious complaints. But then, the judges on
the Ottawa Court never ask. That's the real crime here plus of course, the
failure of the oversight bodies in this matter compounding the problem.
3) I wrote the court on August 28 with regards
to the re-opening of the court and outstanding cases which I have filed. There was no response
and yet you do get a response
on your listed case above.
4)
Mar. 31 e-mail from Dixon:To suggest that my attack on Justice C. Macleod CVZ0-82847 (later dropped by Master Kaufman without taking argument
as well) as both acted without a file no. against The Ottawa Hospital CV 20-82847
and Dr. Jahagirdar (Dr. J,)of Towngate Family Medicine for fraud CVZ0-83096 as being 'a collateral attack' by you is to place the cart before the horse.
Further linking this observation to a duly held trial on Feb. 27 before Justice
Rosalind Conway 19-SC-155235, in a
different court structure is reflective of your ineptitude as a lawyer.
However, judges assigned to the Employee's Case obviously do not look beyond
their noses.
5) I am available for hearings on any of the above matters from
January onward and enclose a copy of this letter
to the Ottawa Courts
for the purpose.
Who knows, maybe this time I will get lucky
and they will respond to all outstanding
cases to be heard in this matter.
I would be available by teleconferencing which
has been my custom for a number of
years now particularly as the case depends
on disclosure of my entire medical
file to ascertain whether Dr. J. made any
recommendation
to the Transport Division-Medical for the suspension of my driver's license
for 'psychiatric reasons'
as quoted in Alulio's unsubstantiated
suspension. That would take
5 minutes. As
it does not seem
that your client
or yourself is willing to divulge that disclosure for reasons 'best known
to yourself' apart from
technicalities, it will be left to the
court (as was the case before Justice Conway on Feb. 27 whom I asked to recuse
herself for cover-up and
improper hearing techniques giving your
B. a private sidebar before I was called in which radically changed
the nature of
that court) to order the production of said disclosure. Without that revelation, there is no point to holding
any trial.
6) As matters stand, there is no connection
between Dr. J. and Franco Alulio hence his action is ultra vires but
I must have a court date for CV20-82943 which is the focus of all
subsequent cases before any other case
related to this matter is heard.
Further, until the ON Law Society gets off their duff and report on my very
serious accusations on my part against both B. and yourself as his legal
representative, your CV20-849830 is stillborn.
7) If this matter were before any other than the
Ottawa Courts, I claim
that you would be
laughed out of
court requesting that very serious accusations against both lawyers
and judges be dismissed as
being frivolous and vexatious. However, as your case is registered in
Ottawa, hence your request to dismiss based on past Ottawa Court Decisions from
2014 onward is a frightening commentary on the Justice System of Canada.
8} You can still put an end to the current imbroglio by producing the
redacted letter by Dr. J. on Oct.15-2019
after receiving 'an information' from whom we do not know nor do we know to
whom she wrote in
response and what was said. Send
me that and I will drop my case against B. and my charges
against you and B. with the (useless) ON
Legal Society. In all likelihood, Dr. J. was being asked to condone Alulio's illicit driver license suspension. Further, your case could just as easily have
been filed as a Defence to my CV20-82889 against B = billable time nonsense.
Yours truly,
Roger Callow
cc U.S.
Professor Williams /Chrystia Freeland/ Justice
Minister D. Lametti / ON A.G. Doug Downey/
Ottawa Superior Court Registry
DEC. 01 Response from Roger Callow Respondent to Cavanagh LLP's (inaccurate account)
1) The above e-mail was received Dec.01-2020
2)
Enclosed here is a one-page letter to the ON legal Society dated Nov. 30
updated with this e-mail Dec. 01 with a copy to the Ottawa Courts (Nathalie Bondy Local Registrar) which still refuses to communicate
with me on other cases earlier listed on this
matter.
Yours truly, Roger Callow
November 30-2020 (sent Nov.30-2020)
TO: Ontario Law Society FROM: Roger Callow - litigant in many cases
Osgoode Hall 130
Queen St. W. #2001-1285
Cahill Dr. Ottawa, KlV 9A7 Toronto, ON MSH 2N6 web: emploveescasecanada.ca RECENT 7 nov. LEGAL MAIL
t.
416-947-3315 f. 416-947-5263 (blocked) t. 613-521-1739
MESSAGE: 5 pages including
this one
1) The key to the 3-page July 3-2020, letter to the Law Society regarding
apparent fraud by two Ottawa lawyers - A. Bissonnette
and K. Dixon - is that it goes without a response from the
Law Society. Nor does the Society
appear to read their legal mail in other
submissions which I have made to them over a period of time.
2) Page 4 dated November 24-2020 in response to
an action CV20-0084930 involving
these two lawyers in a filing made by them could just as easily have been
written as a Defense to my CV20 82993. Currently,
I have called for a trusteeship
to be invoked over the Ottawa courts due to their machinations including these
two lawyers. The situation is just that
bad.
3) In either case, this matter depends heavily on a detailed analysis of the
alleged fraud which I have
provided the ON Law Society on both lawyers. Without that
investigation, Ontario is looking at yet another kangaroo court.
4) Regrettably, empty appeals to Deputy Minister,
Chrystia Freeland as the 'last politician left standing'
in this sorry affair leaves me appealing to our U.S. neighbors to intervene in
Canadian matters as a protection against U.S. commercial interests.
5) It would seem that this letter is to be yet
one more document if there is no proper response from the ON Legal Society in a
Canadian Justice System which has gone bad.
Yours, in disappointment, Roger Callow
Dec.01-2020
On Tue, 1 Dec 2020 at 10:53, Kris Dixon <KDixon@cavanagh.ca> wrote:
Good
morning,
I am the lawyer for the applicant
in the above referenced application. I attach
here a copy of the notice of application.
This is an application for an order, inter a/ia, that the respondent is a
"vexatious litigant" as that term is defined in accordance with
section 140 of the Courts of Justice Act, RSO 1990, c. C43.
Our client will be relying on Rules 14.05(2), 21 and 38 of the Rules of Civil Procedure, R.R.O. 1990,
Reg. 194, and section 140(1) of the Courts
of Justice Act, R.S.O. 1990, c C.4.
We are seeking the following dates for a two hour hearing before a judge:
Yours
truly,
Kris
Kristopher L. Dixon
CAVANAGH
400-411 Roosevelt Avenue, Ottawa ON K2A 3X9 Tel.: 613.780.2027
(direct) I Fax: 613.569.8668
KDixon@cavanagh.ca I www.cavanagh.ca
ORAL ARGUMENT· A PERSPECTIVE ON CV20-849830 - (FEB. 11-2021
Hearing Date)
BY: RESPONDENT Roger Callow in 'Bissonnette vs Callow' (Bissonnette (B.) is a
lawyer represented by Cavanaugh LLP's Kris Dixon, both of whom I have accused
of malfeasance to the Ontario Legal Society. That body has never responded to
any of the very serious legal
concerns
which I have written about these two of which a detailed Report is a major
factor in these current legal events. Hence
a follow-up hearing must be scheduled by this court.
BACl(ROUND:
1) In 2013, the B.C. Courts expelled plaintiff Roger Callow from the B.C.
Justice System for 'reasons best known to a judge' in an unresolved labour matter where no compensation had been paid dating back to 1985.
The matter reverted
to courts across Canada plus the Federal court in order to get redress
for, as an employee laid off for economic reasons
from my senior teaching position in June of 1985 under B.C.'s neophyte imposed BILL 35, I was entitled to
·
compensation whether
it be under Bill 35, the collective bargaining process,
or any other code relating to employment matters.
I have sued the West Vancouver School Board in many courts of law with the current outside
non-prejudiced settlement offer of $20 million. All judges, and there have been
over 50 across Canada rely on the frivolous
and vexatious rules, it is submitted here, to duck out of their responsibilities.
2) The Ontario phase of this case begins in 2014 and is the
progenitor of the current case relating
to the Premier Doug Ford government
seeking to hamstring my case with a fake driver's license
suspension by Ministry of Transport-Medical, Franco Alulio
with whom I have a $10 million action against him for which he failed to
respond: CV20-82943. On his own
recognizance and without taking argument, he perverted the driver suspension
form in Oct. of 2019 to read psychiatric
disorder, a term which cannot be
tested in medicine, with a
number of medical clinics turning the re-testing down. Further, a
lawyer I had on
other matters dropped off with the use
of the above mentioned term stating correctly, that no lawyer could represent
me under these circumstances. Hence I represent myself legally. Oversight bodies
e.g. Ontario A.G. Doug Downey do not respond to my
requests on this dangerous precedent leading me to turn to the U.S. as this
stunt could easily turn into a 'cottage industry' for organized crime. Many
other Canadian politicians, institutions, and media have also turned their
back. If President Trump is unwilling to act to protect U.S. interests, then it
is incumbent on President Biden to act in lieu of the Canadian authorities.
3) No connection has been shown between the actions which
remain undefined by Alulio and any
medical Doctor although it would appear that a redacted letter on October 15 immediately
before the suspension letter to take effect on November 01-2019, from my former
medical Doctor, the young Dr. Jahagirdar (Dr. J,) ofTowngate Family Medicine, appeared to have some
knowledge for which the current request for disclosure
was made from Bissonnette (B). That request promoted,
I submit, the following shenanigans from B.
4) The
following is a pejorative account on my part. B. sought to deflect my claim for disclosure
from Dr. J. by claiming that the Clinic had no
say in such as the disposition of a Doctor's medical file. That was the issue before Small Claims Court Justice Rosalind Conway on February
27-2020 which, under highly unusual circumstances, she failed to act on that
question. I called for her recusal in which she had met privately with B. before
I was called into the
hearing, She altered the terms of B.'s presentation to me from a 'Mandamus
Court' to one of a 'Dispute Resolution Court' not telling me who, indeed,
called for this court in the first place, 'There is no such thing as a mandamus
court' she opined.
Unfortunately the Law Society
has failed miserably in not reporting on this debacle. In that Feb. 27 meeting,
I stated that I had no argument with the two lawyers and was quite willing to
drop all charges against them if I was provided with my entire medical file
which is my property and not that of a medical Doctor. Mayor Jim Watson and Police
Chief P. Sloly were remiss In not acting on my request to seize the remainder of my file without
which, at age 79, I cannot get another Doctor.
5) On August 28, I asked the Ottawa Superior Court as to the status of cases
I had filed, Yet, Dixon esq, has no problem accessing the courts even behind the scenes during
the recent lock down in terms of approaching Master
l<aufman without my knowledge and certainly
without my consent. The amazing thing is that l<aufman
even wrote a Decision for Dixon. Hence, by rights, Dixon should not be
representing B. I ask the court here to determine that question.
6) On Dec. 02, I received back my
rebuttal factum from the Court contesting the Plaintiff's argument stating that
they would provide evidence In court as opposed to providing it to me currently
for my review. One such appeal from Saskatoon in 2018 to New Brunswick courts
currently for fraud is based on the B.C. lawyer faking an unrelated 500 word
factum from a previous court session with a clever cover letter by that lawyer which fooled the Judge but, here is my
point, the judge ordered that document to be placed in my hands revealing that
subterfuge before I returned to court leading to an Action in New Brunswick for
fraud. (In 2014, an ON justice, C. McKinnon, created 3 different Decisions on the
same matter; none referencing the other='would the real Colin McKinnon please
stand up'. There was no investigation from the Cdn. Council of Judges.) The Ottawa court's rejection which
I returned with my documents
was on a spurious Original Affidavit Required
which is not detailed in Form 18A. It seems that with digital
hearings, such paper arguments which
always appear in court may be sidetracked in digital
format. I request that the judge ask for my Respondent submission should the Registrar
have failed to pass along this vital
material which I returned.
7) A central
question for the Registrar is why the Plaintiffs in CV20"849830 are able to supplant my previously laid cases making their case
redundant? On those
grounds alone, the above
case should be thrown out of court
with costs to me, Their case has been scheduled for
Feb. 11 at 10 A.M. for two hours. I still have no dates for my cases.
8) While I include
reference to media personalities, the situation is such that only President Biden can make any difference
to a nation bent on rack and ruin - assuming Trump does nothing - in taking
down with it, as it does, the USA.
ACTION REQUIRED:
1) Dismiss Claim of B. and Dixon with costs for being frivolous and vexatious.
2) Order either these two lawyers or the Ottawa
police to acquire my complete medical file. If I get that, I will drop all claims against these two lawyers as stated in court on Feb.27-2020.
3) Take those steps which would require
the ON Legal Society to give a detailed Report
on the activities of these
two lawyers based on information which I have provided to them.
3)
Call for the disclosure of the
B.C. West Vancouver School Board meeting notes in July of 1985 by their legal counsel
which led to a court Decision by Justice Mary Southin
in 1986 to quash the arbitration favouring the Board ruling, in that process, the arbitrator
to be patently unreasonable. The
ordered re-arbitration never
took place. I have since been left in limbo.
4)
Ensure that my original rebuttal to CV20-849830 is included in this court hearing.
IN
CONCLUSION, it is a major critique that
such a nation as Canada has to go
begging for justice to a foreign nation.
The 35 year unresolved employeescasecanada.ca has
reflected the fact that Canada
does not have a Justice System; rather, merely a Legal System under the aegis
of corrupt and corruptible judges and chief justices. This case did not create
this debacle; it merely reflects what has
been going on for decades in Canada
but recently, has taken a turn for the worst. As matters stand, no
Canadian can trust to a Canadian court of law. In brief, President Biden,
Canada needs your help.
CHRYSTIA FREELAND (Sub-heading
rogercallow.com
JANUARY 2021)
MESSAGE:
l) This application to Chrystia Freeland,
Deputy P.M. is a last ditch request by this writer to assign 'a friend of Roger
Callow' to represent him in this court. An earlier letter to which there was no
response from Freeland was written due to the failure of ON A.G. Doug Downey
& Minister of Justice, David Lametti, to act on
very serious allegations by this writer.
Respectfully
submitted, Roger Callow 'The Outlawed Canadian' snuffed out by all Canadian
institutions including the politicians, courts and media.
Only Chrystia Freeland
can save the day for
Canada with a quick
resolution to the Employee's case.
2) The request in 1) above is
that, due to the Franco Alulio fake driver license suspension of this targeted
driver, I cannot
acquire a lawyer
on any basis for any matter; a direct rejection of the Human Rights code, I laid an Action against Alulio (CV20-82943) for
usurping the law to which he has never replied nor will the Ottawa Court
provide a hearing date. Only Dixon's Application gets filed as all my other filed actions are ignored by the Ottawa Court.
3) The essence of the 14 page Plaintiff Application is found in the first Section
on p. 1:
1.
To declare
the Respondent Roger Callow
as being a 'vexatious
litigant'; standard boiler-plate law which courts use with
abandon to duck their judicial responsibilities.
2. A
court Order muzzling this Respondent in pursuing legal redress.
3.
A court Order
blocking the pursuit of filed actions '...in
any way pertaining to the circumstances giving rise to the suspension of his driving
privileges....' In brief,
the algorithm created by
Franco Alulio, Deputy Minister of Transport,Medical,
becomes de facto law negatively affecting all drivers in North America.
4.
A bid to eradicate
CV20-82889 for fraud against
B, without having
the benefit of an ON Legal Society Report.
5.
A preposterous
request of the court permitting B. and his representative, Dixon, whom is also
a subject of fraud with the ON Legal Society for separate reasons, to never
having to respond to any legal action I may choose to pursue; in essence, their
Point 1. Dixon, an ESL teacher in S. Korea in 2015, a new member to the bar,
thought nothing of privately approaching the A.G.'s
Master Kavanagh whom, amazingly, wrote a private
Decision for him. This same Master, without
a trial, earlier
dropped my action
against Ottawa's Justice Macleod (CV20-83096) thus changing the entire dynamic of the Canadian
Justice System in which powerful interests (think SNC Lavalin)
may avoid court trials altogether.
6. 'costs of this application, on a
substantial indemnity basis....' And these two 'Bobbsey Twins'
(Internet label) expect to be rewarded for
their chicanery,
ACTION
OF THIS COURT REQUESTED BY THE RESPONDENT
4) i will be available by telephone from 10 A.M. for the 2 hour hearing on
Feb. 11-2021. I prohibit the court
from proceeding unless
a telephone connection is made. Freeland
is asked to oversee this feature.
5) The hearing should take less than 5 minutes as my request relates
to disclosure of the following:
a) The original application (CVZ0-180006950) which
the Premier Ford gov't inherited from
the Liberals relating to Employer and Unloh
notes regarding the lay-off of this senior teacher for economic reasons
in June of 1985 under the imposed
BILL 35 (B.C. 1985)
in which no
compensation has been paid. A
second illicit lay-off meeting in July, 1985, by the Employer, the
West-Vancouver School Board, was fraudulently conducted which, if proven,
leaves all action 'null and void' by the Employer. It is those notes submitted
to the B.C. court In 1986
which are at question. Both Employer and Union have copies denied
to me.
b) In absence of the Toronto
Police and Mayor
John Tory to seize documentation from Franco Alulio (CVZ0-82943), to order Alulio to provide information as to which authority he was acting under and why Respondent Roger Callow is the victim
of a perverted driver license
suspension form. That case should be heard first.
c) A court Order to the ON Legal Society to provide a detailed
response to this Respondent and the Court vis a vis charges of fraud (for different reasons) against both
B. a11d Dixon.
d)
Any further materials supplied by Cavanagh
LLP at this Hearing on February 11-2021.
6)
Additional Information is available from the copious
records of the Defendant on request by this court.
7) Reverse the indemnity request by the Plaintiff and award findings
to this Respondent In like measure. What the Bobbsey
Twins are doing is a replication of 2014 in which the usual legal tactic of
'the best form of Defense is Offense'; that is, do not respond in any meaningful fashion to a Plaintiff's Action
deferring to a second Action launched by the Defendant in order to control the
case as is happening here. If the court - including the ON Legal Society - had
acted properly in 2014, we would not be in court today
with one of the most egregious actions by a bureaucrat ever created In a democratic society. It is a typical
example of what I label
the effects of 'reverse osmosis'.
The Ottawa courts
seem incap.;1ble of curtailing this
perniclou5
practice in this case; first introduced in 2014.
ACTION
TO BE TAKEN BY THE U.S.
8) Until Deputy Minister,
Christia Freeland takes concrete action
in the above matter, the U.S.
should handle all legal matters - both
diplomatic and commercial - In U.S. courts.
ACTION
TO BE TAKEN BY THE PUBLIC AT LARGE
9) To
add this PLACARD to your street protest in N. America (but please, no violence
to people)
JUSTICE
FOR CANADIAN, ROGER CALLOW
Yours truly, Roger Callow Respondent
January 15-2021
TO the presiding Ottawa Court Justice
hearing the below
case on Feb.
11-2021 (sealed envelope to court filed with this account. cc Cavanagh
LLP by mail
COURT
OPTION:
To either dispense with the claim below as being 'without merit'
and award me similar 'significant costs' parallel to which the Appellant would
request
OR
respond in detail to the myriad questions
related to fraud as seen through many institutions on a written basis. Without
that level of court investigation, claims related to the original lay off in B.C., the ON version
commencing with the Ford ascension to the gov't.(CV18000 76950), the Franco Alulio action I laid to which he never responded (CV20-82943) nor has the Ottawa Court seen fit to give me a Hearing
Date; Justice Rosalind Conway Hearing Feb.27-2020 (19- SC-155235) where
she failed to deal with the issues, leading for my call for her recusal, no
reports on the alleged fraud for separate reasons for the two lawyers named in the
current action from the ON Legal Society;
nothing can proceed without this court being labeled just · another 'whitewash
job'. The Canadian Justice Ministry and the gov't. of
democratic Canada would be no more leaving us at the mercy of U.S. Marines. I
must be in attendance by telephone as COVID-19 concerns and my age (79) leave
me highly vulnerable to infection. (I have never found the Ottawa law courts to
be all that sanitary in any event.)
Two earlier
factums have
been supplied to the Court for this purpose and this marks the third such
entry. (SEE website: rogercallow.com CV20-849830 for all
three factums of this Respondent.)
p\
Yours truly, (signed) Roger Callow January 15-2021.
On Dec.08-2020, as Respondent, I wrote on CV20-849830:
IN CONCLUSION, It is a major critique that such a nation as Canada has to go
begging for justice to a foreign nation. The 35 year unresolved employeescasecanada.ca
has reflected the fact that Canada does not have a Justice System; rather, merely
a Legal System under the aegis
of corrupt and corruptible judges and chief justices. This case did not
create this debacle; it merely reflects what has been
going on for decades in Canada but recently, has taken a turn
for the worst. As matters stand, no Canadian can trust to a Canadian court of
law. In brief, President Biden, Canada needs your help.
1/
TO: U.S.
Embassy (Ottawa) by fax: JANUARY 27-2021
613-241-7845 ! pge.
FROM: Roger
Callow self-represented Respondent CV20-849830 (Feb.11-2021 hearing date)
rcal/ow770@gmai/,com
REFERENCE: ADDENDUM to ORAL ARGUMl:NT dated DEC.08-2020 by
the Respondent SEE employeescasecanada.ca 2020 LEGAL MAIL
this date.
cc Andrew
Coyne (Globe& Mail)
Mark Bonokoski / Tarek Fatah
(Ottawa Sun) Kelly
Egan (Ottawa Citizen) Ellie Tesher (The Star) J.
lvison / C.
Selby (National Post)CAVANAGH MESSAGE;
1) I am sure that President Biden has concerns other than the direct interests of Roger Callow on Feb.
11·2021 where the future state of Canada is to be defined in <1n Ottawa courtroom. 2)I am equally sure indirectly that President Biden is
concerned with matters relating to
a 'clear
and present danger' to U.S. interests as a consequence of this legal matter. I
speak here
of the Franco Alulio algorithm of which the U.S. Embassy
(Ottawa) has been
kept fully apprised under
two Presidents.
3) This algorithm is central to the legal interests
of Roger Callow as well as to the legal interests indirectly for every N.
American motorist for we live in a car culture.
4) My repeated request here is that President
Biden publicize this issue to U.S. diplomatic and commercial interests as it affects
dealings with Canadian courts of law.
5)
/!tJc
Should President Biden choose to ignore this
request, perhaps the new Patriot Party being organized in Palm Beach will oblige,
Yours truly,
(Roger Callow)
(A)
File:
rogercallow.com FEB.01-2021 MEDIA
TO: U.S.
Embassy (Ottawa) by fax: JANUARY 27-2021
613-241-7845 ! pge.
FROM: Roger
Callow self-represented Respondent CV20•849830 (Feb.11-2021 hearing date)
REFERENCE: ADDENDUM
to ORAL ARGUMENT dated
DEC.08-2020 by the Respondent
SEE employeescasecanada.ca 2020 LEGAL,MAJL this date.
cc Andrew
Coyne (Globe& Mail)
Mark Bonokoski / Tarek Fatah (Ottawa
Sun) Kelly Egan (Ottawa Citizen) Ellie Tesher (The Star) J. lvison / C.
Selby (National Post)CAVANAGH MESSAGE:
1) I am sure that President Biden
has concerns other than the direct interests
of Roger Callow on Feb.11-2021 where the future state of Canada is to be
defined in an Ottawa courtroom.
2) I am equally sure indirectly that President Biden is
concerned with matters relating to a 'clear and present danger' to U.S.
interests as a consequence of this legal matter. I speak here of the Franco Alulio
algorithm of which the U.S. Embassy (Ottawa) has been kept fully apprised under
two Presidents.
3)
This algorithm
is central to the legal interests of Roger Callow as well as to the legal
interests
indirectly for every N. American motorist for
we live in a car culture.
4) MY
repeated request here is that President Biden publicize this issue to U.S.
diplomatic and commercial interests as it affects dealings with Canadian courts
of law.
S) Should President Biden choose to ignore this request, perhaps
the new Patriot
Party being or ed
inPalm
Beach will oblige.
Yours truly, (Roger Callow)
B) January 22,202.1
TO: Superior Court of Justice Registrar 161 Elgin St. Ottawa, ON
1<2P 21<1
! page by mail cc Cavanagh LLP by
email
FROM: Roger Callow self
represented Respondent
#2001-1285 Cahill Dr. Ottawa KlV 9A7 rcallow770@gmail. com t.613-521-1739
cc Deputy PM Freeland by fax /Media by email
U.S
Embassy (Ottawa) by fax
web: roger callow.com MEDIA JAN. 22-2021
REFERENCE: CV20-849830 Bissonnette v. Callow H.D,
February 11-2021 MESSAGE:
1) As the Respondent concerned whom wishes to attend the above hearing
by teleconferencing, I request
that you make the necessary arrangements.
2) Normally, the Registry
in conjunction with the presiding Justice confirms teleconferencing the previous day by telephone.
3) Considering
the anomalies being
experienced in this case, I submit that if I do not hear from the Registrar on Wednesday, Feb. 10,
I will conclude that no teleconferencing arrangements were made.
4) My biggest concern
is that no hearing will be held on Feb.
11~2021 with the court Issuing
a private Decision to the Plaintiff about which I will not be informed. Such action would give the two
lawyers the necessary
relief they request
to be exonerated on separate charges of fraud while leaving the Franco Alulio
algorithm intact with the courts refusing to entertain previously laid
actions by this writer; all pointing to Alulio's
inopportune driver license scam which is anathema
to all North American drivers.
It is a repeat of Ottawa court action in 2014
on this legal matter with the addition of the algorithm mentioned above.
/(/,JC,
Yours truly, Roger Callow Respondent
C)
FEB.
11-2021 OUTCOMES:
CV20-849830 Ottawa Court House (2 hrs.)
Bissionnette (esq) Appellant v. Roger Callow Respondent
MESSAGE:
1) This story on the media has already been told favouring, as it does, the big Employer, and no matter what
they do, their boycott of this national issue for the minority (me) for many
years puts to rest any credibility that the media might have, TWO VERSIONS (sub-heading) both written
by me - one purporting to be the media position and the second a rebuttal to
the first account puts in sharp relief the two sides so that the public can see this disparity. For other reasons,
the media is disappearing in any event as only talk-show radio appears to have
much of a future.
2) For similar
reasons, the politicians of Canada have disappeared as a force as the public
have gone from a positive to a negative
perception of them inside of one year.
COVID is exposing that disjunct not only in Canada
but throughout the world.
Putin's warning at Davros 'all against
all' is a prescient observation in that regard. The silence of Canada's
politicians on the Employee's Case, particularly the Franco Alulio algorithm right out of Nazi
Germany, can now metastasize with the addition of medical treatment centres (Auschwitz)
due to political Inaction.
3) The courts of law repeatedly lie (as CBC's
senior correspondent, Neil MacDonald has asserted recently. SEE rogercal/ow.com MEDIA feb. for excerpts.) I have always
maintained that the 35 year Employee's Case did not create
the malfeasance and misfeasance of the
courts; it has merely exposed long term corruption marked primarily by the
failure of oversight bodies to check on charges against
judges. No Cdn. judge
has ever been
sent to jail. In
the words of city
guru, Jane Jacobs, a country goes rotten
when its infrastructure fails.
Canada's infrastructure has failed. I call it Institutional Autism where Institutions
speak only to other institutions with the individual left
out. So what the gullible call 'law and order' is actually 'lawlessness and
disorder by the officials '. Ancient Rome fell on those terms.
4) So, Mrs. Lincoln, you might just as well skip the Play and stay
home planning your husband's funeral. With that analogy, there are 3 possible
outcomes for FEB. 11-2021;
a) Granting the young 'Bobbsey Twin Lawyers'
whom I have accused of fraud
to the ON Legal Society (which
does not respond
to its legal mail) exoneration from my claims
with 'substantial fees' to be
applied. It goes without saying that the Franco Alulio
algorithm where a target is barred from having legal counsel for any legal matter is ghosted with this '20-20
hindsight manoeuvre'; a devastating indictment in
which all drivers in North America are condemned accordingly. A bigger crime is
being condoned with this option; namely, the privilege of some legal counsel to
approach the judges privately before a hearing- 'In the halls of Justice, all
justice is in the halls'. Further with this option, the two young lawyers which
I have charged separately with fraud get to keep their legal licenses.(The
strongest Union in Canada is the legal fraternity. They know how to take care
of their own.)
b) To avold any
controversy, the court could refuse to hear the case on the grounds that the
Plaintiffs 'have not made a case'. That would have to be done at the outset
before any argument is taken
based on the written evidence
before the court.
That alternative leaves
the govt'. with a 'dirty biscuit' much like
the Ford gov't inherited this 'dirty biscuit' with a
docket number assigned on the last day of the preceding Liberals
being in Office.
c) This option is more interesting but just as
fallacious. The court will call for my written rebuttal which the Registry
is blocking through
spurious rneans. Further
they will call for the
Franco Allulio response as to
why he invoked this charge in the first place in a perverted manner by changing the suspension forms in the fashion that he did,
Other disclosure may be called for. It will be done in such legal fashion
that the Plaintiff can appeal the Decision to a 3- person
Appeal Court which is, of course, Is a matter
of 'issue oblivion' by these political Appeal Courts. In brief, the court will be seen to observe the
principle of disclosure without
actually fulfilling the task. To be sure, a desperate media will latch onto
this alternative in the short range. After all, this trial
is essentially about
the demise of the Cdn. media
as seen through
the failure of the gov't. institutions
outlined above.
5) As Respondent, I have prohibited the Feb. 11
Court from proceeding witho1,1t teleconferencing privileges for me. The Ottawa
Court Registry has been appealed to on that basis. The proceedings should last
about 5 minutes as I seek time to study disclosure
documents of the Plaintiff,
6) So, dear reader,
similar to Mrs. Lincoln, you might just as well skip the Play on Feb.11-2021
and stay home planning the funeral for the nation of Canada.
QLJc.,
Respectfully submitted, Roger
Callow 'The last
of the good guys' Now you know why I don't vote any longer
FEBRUARY 11-2021 CHRYSTIA FREELAND - part II
TO: Chrystia Freeland - Deputy P.M. FROM: Roger
Callow Plaintiff in many legal cases
by fax: 613-996-9607 PAGES 1 rogercallow.com (Sub-heading) FEB 11 THE CONCLUSION (includes 3pge.
Justice Roger comments from 'Feb. 11' to Freeland only CV20-849830)
QUOTE: When the
institutions of a society deteriorate, a society dies. 'city guru' Jane Jacobs
MESSAGE:
1)
This account is in addition to the letter of January 06 (rogercallow.com
CHRYSTIA FREELAND Sub heading)
showing that Deputy Minister, Chrystia Freeland,
Canada's foremost politician and possibly next P.M. is 'a part of the problem'
regarding Canada's past and future well-being as opposed to the solution.
Through her in the microcosm is seen the condemnation of all politicians in the
macrocosm who evade central issues such as the one labeled the Employee's Case;
the 35 year unresolved labour matter where no compensation has been paid.
2)
'FEB. 11' in an Ottawa Court Case held by bastardized vertical
procedures is reflective of why I have called for a Trusteeship over this
despicable Court which, in actuality, is symbolic of the decay focused in
Canada through your personage for all politicians. The actual case has no merit
as it is a repeat of the failed ON stunt pulled in 2014 by the West Vancouver
School Board in 1985 which set the precedent that a powerful Employer may
escape paying compensation to dismissed employees complete with recall rights bitched
by over 50 judges in all provinces-except NL- in Canada, through their illicit
connections. (Actually, I was 'laid off' under the imposed BILL 35 (B.C. 1985) the
only teacher so affected before the Bill was withdrawn with this case still
before the courts= Banana Republic Justice. Hence I am still an employee of the
Board, albeit an unpaid one=
$20 million
settlement fee) Here's what the North Shore
News had to say:
Get This Straight(c. 1986)
'...The teacher who was dumped was Roger
Callow, and his dismissal (whatever happened to 'lay-off with recall rights'?) will
go into the history books along with other great happenings like the invention
of the steam engine and the telephone.' (you
may yet be right here, Doug)' ...Can you
remember any other teacher being shown the door for incompetence? ...The
revolutionary heave-ho of which I speak became possible because the Socreds have brought in BILL 35 (dead on, Doug)...As far as Mr. Callow is concemed,
I cannot say whether he is in fact incompetent...(Why not? You did everywhere else in your diatribe)...Enter Mrs. Margot
Fmk, the schoolboard woman from West Vancouver who
looks meek, but isn't...(she looks about
as meek as Attila the Hun...and to think Dougy was
also criticized for being anti female) She was one of the leading lobbyists for
t,,,...
BILL 35 (Don't.forget the role of John Reynolds,
local A1PP now the federnl justice critic.for the Refimn Party for Christ's sake!) and voted
for Callow's removal...'How was it possible, I asked
her, that a man who had been employed for I 7 years could be incompetent?'
"Because in the past no one had the guts to do anything about him," she added smartly...UP THE REVOLUTION' (I'll hJ1, Doug, I'll but it seems
the revolution has already hoisted you on your own petard and Ji-om the sounds of your squealing, you don't like walking
the proverbial mile in my boots...Oh, well, I think those boots are far too big.for you anyway...so, Doug...e11joy, enjoy the revolutionw,, heave ho....
In brief, I was the target of a set-up which
ultimately led to the demise of the credibility of the Cdn.
Justice System with related institutions and hence the loss of Canada as a
nation. I call it
Institutional Autism where institutions speak only to other
institutions thus making a mockery of our Charter of Rights and Freedoms for
individuals.
THE FUTURE
3)
There isn't any, particularly for those people who still believe in the vote.
For those who question voting in Canada under these circumstances, one option,
which applies to the U.S. as well, is to consider the 14th Colony protocol in
which the U.S. permits Canada to join as a U.S. state. In brief, the obsolete
BNA Act of 1867 plus precedent law is too unwieldy for Canada to function
smoothly any longer. By becoming a U.S. state, Canadians get to revise their gov't. in terms of a Governor and his Council. Miscreant
judges, for example, do not go to jail in Canada where the Legal Fraternity is
the strongest Union which 'protects its own'.They do
in the U.S.
The U.S. has a different perspective on this
Protocol; namely, Canada is its northern military flank. Even the Netherlands
has a bigger Navy than Canada.
4)
The one thing in which both the U.S. and Canada have a vital common
interest lies in the Franco Alulio algorithm whereby
this Ontario bureaucrat, for reasons best known to himself, perverted the
driver license suspension forms in such fashion that this target was robbed of
any access to a lawyer for any legal
purpose. All drivers in N. America are vulnerable to this Nazi-like scheme
which could easily become an Organized Crime 'cottage industry' in both
countries. To that extent, Chrystia Freeland's
silence on this paramount issue is a personal indictment of everything she
stands for. I call for all protesters across North America to add this Placard
to their street demonstrations as a consequence: JUSTICE FOR ROGER CALLOW
5)
Then what was the purpose of 'FEB. 11' other than the legal issues
involved? The media. No democratic nation can exist without a viable media. By
ghosting the national issue of the Employees Case, the Cdn.
Media has shot their credibility down the crapper forever. CBC and Postmedia now depend on gov't
hand-outs in a losing bid to stay afloat. There will be no tears from me when
they go to their ultimate destination although I will miss the comic strips.
FEB. 1I came and went with the media
holding tight to the bitter end which is now and forever. It no longer matters
what they say or do on this issue or any other major issue.
Respectfully submitted, Roger Callow 'Amom de
Cosmos' former Canadian citizen whose appeal now will be to as yet an un-named
Governor General (the last one was a disaster on this issue; see website: emploveescasecanada.ca
2016)
cc The GANG OF 8 media representatives for all Cdn.
media: Andrew Coyne (Globe& Mail) Mark Bonokoski / Tarek Fatah (Ottawa
Sun) Kelly Egan (Ottawa Citizen) Ellie Tesher (The
Star) J, Ivison / C, Selby (National Post) L.Gunter (SUN - national edition)
cc The U.S. Embassy (Ottawa) / U.S. Professor
VDH Hanson, particularly on Alulio algorithm
cc Justice Pierre Rogers Hearing judge for CV20-849830 / Cavanagh LLP
Justice Pierre Roger, the hearing judge for CV20-849830 is a senior judge in the Ottawa Courts appointed by
Peter MacKay in 2015. He was formerly associated with Borden, Ladner, Gervais in Ottawa. His
alma mater, Ottawa U. isn't exactly the cadillac of
law schools but he has enough experience to spot a scam such as this one in
which the conspirators under a blanket ban would seek to ghost such as the
Franco Alulio Algorithm which I submit is the main
goal here. It is a highly duplicitous action considering that other actions
such as the one pending in N.B. naming the B.C. legal outfit for the Employer, Harris & Co. and two SK judges on fraud
charges would, presumably, be included under this blanket ban as well as
including the highly illicit actions of 4 Ontario judges dating back to 2014
which remain unexamined. In 2014, the court rejected Employer overtones on this
level probably for these reasons.
The correct response for Rogers is to dispense
with this case for being overly broad under the banner 'the case lacks merit'
which would put an end to all the Employee's Case challenges considering my
Dec. 31-2021 volunteer action to drop any further quest for compensation as I
am not going to get it. The only reason that I participate in Feb. I I is that I am the Respondent
Depending on Roger's action which, should it
go ahead, I have invited him to ask written questions of both sides in a case
to be handled on a 'written party by party basis'. Should he give the
Applicants what they want without question, I will not refer Rogers j. to the
oversight bodies or to a 'political' Appeal Court; rather, I will challenge him
to the new Governor General requesting that he be relieved of all activities
related to the Canadian Justice System. The Franco Alulio algorithm is too dangerous
to be sloughed off this way.
As to Dixon asking this Applicant to sit on a phone line for 5 hours plus
while he sits around the courts; that is not on my program. A few years back in
Gatineau, I sat around a court along with other dunderhead lawyers for this is
where the big outfits send them on minor cases hoping to charge later on a
'win'. The dunderheads are as happy as clams as well knowing the judges are in
on this scam. That is why Dixon, if he was serious about this case, would have
changed his ZOOM application to one of telephone conferencing where the court,
when ready, telephone the litigants who are able to go on with other things
while waiting. Unfo1tunately here, stupidity was heaped on stupidity; that is
Court nonsense heaped on lawyer nonsense has scuttled today's hearing as any
Decision is compromised should the court proceed today. If the matter is not to
be dropped, as I recommend, then rebuild the case properly. Rogers j., in
summary, should not throw good actions onto a suspect foundation thus drawing
into question any judicial conclusion he might
draw.
Respectfully submitted Roger Callow
FEB.11-2021
FEB.11 9 A.M. TO: Cavanagh LLP from Roger Callow Feb. 11-2021 Feb. 11 4 A.M. CV20-849830 10 A.M. hearing time
1) Thank-you for
your reply dated last night 21:26
2)
The key difference between a ZOOM call and teleconferencing is that the
Court in league with the sitting judge must agree to this routine. Hence it is
not merely a technical difference. The Ottawa Court Registry was notified by me
in plenty of time to act but did not hence providing a response to the Registry
is superfluous.
3)
I will, as earlier stated to you, be available between I 0-10:30 for the
court to telephone me. I will not contact them under the above noted circumstances.
4)
Nor will I
contact you in that time period.
5)
You may wish to reconsider and drop your case considering that I am not pursuing
any aspect of the Employee's Case involving either you or Bissionnette.
Of course you have the option of requesting a postponement considering how the
courts screwed up here. Further, Justice C. MacLeod has shown that he can fix
any problem which ails you such as merely dropping any cases without a hearing
as he has already done in this case vis a vis the Ottawa General Hospital.
6)
In the event you insist on pursuing this matter, the topic of fraud
remains paramount. Disclosure from
the ON Legal Society Report on alleged fraud against both of you made by me for
separate reasons becomes paramount.
ADDENDUM: As I did not
hear from Cavanagh LLP to the above by 9 A.M. to get
this matter on track for today, I am requesting through their offices,
considering that the Registry does not provide similar services to me, to enter
a 'stay of proceedings' on my behalf until a future date is named by the court.
As matters stand, any Decision reached by the court today would be null and
void until such time that the court is restructured properly as defined above.
Consequently, I will not be available by telephone today. 10 A.M. Dixon never replied to this
e-mail 10:20 A.M. Dixon is 'damning the
torpedoes' and proceeding, shall I say,
regardless. '
4 P.M. 3 page Decision from Justice Pierre Roger
which refuses to recognize any other
vertical dimension other than ZOOM which I do not have and the court was
unwilling to contact me on any level
= request for the recusal of Justice Roger
through arrangements made by Deputy Minister C.
Freeland.
(that is,
until a new Gov. Gen. is appointed) P.S. Note 3):1 was here and there was no
phone call from the court at 11:45 A.M. I find Justice Roger to be prejudiced
against my interests as outlined in 3). I cannot trust to this Registry on any
level. Either the Registry is misleading the
Justice or the Justice is
misleading me. Would the newly assigned justice please accept teleconferencing.
Immediate attention required as April 8,2021 is the new H.D. To repeat, my interest does not lie with pursuing these two
lawyers. It does lie in the court not ghosting such as the Franco Alulio algorithm.
FORM 23A
Courts of
Justice Act
NOTICE OF DISCONTINUANCE
ROGER CALLOW AND ALEXANDRE BISSIONNETTE CV20-84943
(FEB. 23, 2021)
FEBRUARY 23-2020 (file: rogerca/low.com
MEDIA mar)
TO: Interim GG SCofC Chief Justice
Richard Wagner/ Rideau Hall/ 1 Sussex Dr. Ott.K1A 0A1
(Sent by letter mail) 1: pages
(also mailed to Ottawa Court Registry)
FROM: Roger Callow Plaintiff 1285 Cahill Dr. #2001 Ottawa
K1V 9A7 t: 613-521-1739
websites: employeescasecanada.ca to 2020. rogercal/ow.com from 2021 onward
REFERENCE: CV20-849830 Bissonnette
esq. v Callow H.,o.
April 08-2021
cc DEPUTY MINISTER CHRYSTIA FREELAND & U.S. EMBASSY
(OTTAWA), by fax
MESSAGE:
1) On FEB.22-2021, I received by e-mail (rcallow770@gmail.com) the
following message from an Ottawa Court Registry factotum:
Ottawa SCJ Courts
(MAG) Mon, 22 Feb, 14:24
Hello Roger,
So you are aware, we do not send corre,pondence
to judges unless the j.idge has expressly advisect Lis to do so.
As for your email; I'm not sure what you are
referring to when you say "Incorrect File Number", 20-84983 is
correct. In regards to your comments for the event that you did not attend, the
parties are to call into the event. We
generally do not attempt to call the parties, in this case however a call was
attempted as Indicated in the endorsement.
So you ,:ire aware the justice is able to decide on how the matter
will proceed. You will need to attend the' scheduled zoom event and bring
this up if you
have concerns. A for providing
you the details
to connect to the event, I have added your email "Roger
Callow rcallow770@gm:,il.cotYI"
and updated my internal
partners to ensure that you receive the information. Generally this
information is provided the day prior
to the event. Thank you, (unsigned RC)
2)
Response
regarding above to GG/Chrystia Freeland:
a)
While
hospitals may use a first name to rouse a comatose patient; the situation is
not parallel-in a court of law i.e. when
the court asks me to identify myself before proceeding, I am not merely 'Roger' as my full name must be
used. The Plaintiff in this matter 'l<ris' of Cavanagh LLP has the same problem not recognizing that the
'woke generation' has not taken over...yet.
b)
The correct
designation of this filed motion by Cavanagh
originally last November is CV20- 849830
not CV20"84983 as Bacque would assert Changing one letter on a password can
confound any transmission hence I refuse to recognize any further conduct of
this case until proper legal corrections
are made. Both the GG and Freeland are notified in order to oversee this correction process, No Court
transmissions were received by me on Feb. 10 or Feb. 11.
c)
Technical glitches on the Feb. 11 vertical hearing could very well be the
source of Pierre Roger j's misguided directions
although those directions were perverted to such an extent compromising my side of the case that I found it necessary to request his recusal as of Mar.15
d)
There was 'no previous day warning' from the court as to this hearing
which makes no recognition of my request to be heard bv teleconferencing which
is NOT the same as ZOOM as a judge must be made aware of the request
and approve accordingly.
e)
The above information was included in material (Reply
25A) material to Justice Roger
but the Registry hamstrung the normal procedures through picayune
regulations. I have been dealing for many years, including
the Ottawa courts
in 2014, without
this kind of nonsense.
f)
While Cavanagh LLP has supplied
some written materials gratuitously on my behalf, I still
request direct written cont<1ct with the sitting
judge cc Cavanagh LLP on this
matter. Hell, if both
these lawyers are able to make private
representations to judges as detailed
to the ON Legal Society (which
doesn't respond to its
legal news); why can't I through a legal process?
3) Included with this letter is <1
cancellation of CV20·84943 I
made against Alexander Biss. esq
called to the bar In 2017 (and already
having private side-bars with A.G.
Deputy Justice Rosalind Conway (bench appt. 2018. These A.G. appointments are
particularly troublesome in this case) on Feb. 27 in SDC 19-SC-155235 (illicit mandamus/agreement settlement court where
I called for her recusal for failing to deal with
the issues). There is some question
as to whether the Ottawa
Registry filed CV20-84943. Nonetheless, I am sending in a Form 23A Notice of discontinuance with this account. As there was
never any response from Bissionnette; no expense was
incurred by him. However, if a legal fee is attached to any action which he
launches such as the above CV20•849830; then
he should expect a similar charge in the same amount. In brief, there is no
realistic reason for Cavanagh LLP to proceed any further
4) The alleged conspiracy in this current CV20-849830 was conceived, it is asserted here, before I abandoned
all hope on December 31, 2020 of getting redress for my 35 year senior teacher
lay-off for economic reasons due to judicial malfeasance of over 50 judges
across Canada, I om only present currently as I .irn named as a frivolous
and vexatious Respondent who has had my
case usurped by this Plaintiff aping a similar pattern in 2014 in Ontario (SEE
website). My written offer to Roger j. to dismiss is still valid until March 15-2021.
5) The allegation here is that Roger j. will insert a 'Trojan
Horse' into my affairs beyond the
Employee's
Case which I have abandoned as noted above. That deprivation could be linked to
the existence of my website aping the
U.S. Patriot Act
closing down so-called terrorist
websites. That action, if it materializes,
would be the biggest criminal
action in Canada as there is no parallel to a Patriot Act. Columnist Lorne
Gunter has raised the question as far as the government through BILL C-10
performing such an 'internet' action for
Parliament. A similar carte
blanche action by Roger j. could achieve the same result for the judges.
6)
A copy of this
Jetter is being
sent to the Ottawa
Registry by mail
to be forwarded to Roger j.
as well as Cavanagh LLP for forwarding
purposes to him.
7) The earlier request to the GG to represent me under 'we
the people' still stands.
;:;; C/Y}f
Yours truly, Roger Callow February 23-2021
also cc L.Gunter /
U.S. Professor V. Hanson (&
Ottawa Sun columnist)
MAR
15-2021:THERE HAS BEEN NO RESPONSE FROM ANY SOURCE TO THE FOLLOWING. RC
FEBRUARY 23-2021 (file: rogerca/low.com
MEDIA mar)
TO: Interim GG SCofC Chief Justice Richard Wagner/ Rideau Hall/ 1 Sussex Dr.
Ott.KIA 0A1
(Sent by letter mail) .i. pages
(also mailed to Ottawa Court Registry)
FROM; Roger Callow Plaintiff 1285 Cahill
Dr, #2001 Ottawa KlV 9A7 t; 613-521-1739 websites: emp/oyeescasecanada.ca to 2020. rogercallow,com from 2021 onward REFERENCE: CV20•849830 Bissonnette esq. v Callow H.D. April 08-2021
cc DEPUTY MINISTER CHRYSTIA FREELAND & U.S. EMBASSY
(OTTAWA). by fax
MESSAGE:
1) On FEB.22-2021, I received by e-mail (rcallow770@gmail.com) the
following message from
an Ottawa Court Registry factotum:
Ottawa SCJ Courts (MAG) Mon,
22 Feb, 14:24
Hello Roger,
So you are aware, we do not send correspondence to judge, unle, thejudge has expressly advised
us to do so.
As for your email; I'm not sure whst
yo1,1 are referring to when you say "Incorrect File Number", 20-84983
is
correct. In regards to your comments for the event that you
did not attend,
the parties are to
call into the event. We generally do not
attempt to call the p<1rt ie 51 in this c $e however a
call was attempted as indicated
in the endorsement.
So you are aware the justice is able to decide
on how the matter will proceed. You will need to attend the
scheduled Zoom event and bring this up if you have concerns. As for
providing you the details to connect to the eve'nt, I have added your email "Roger Callow rcallow770@gmail.corn" and updated niy iliternal
partners to i,nsure that you receive the information,
Gener lly this information
is provided the day prior to the evenL
Thank you, (unsigned RC)
2) Response regarding above to GG/Chrystia Freeland:
a) While hospitals may use a
first name to rouse a comatose patient; the situation is not parallel in a court
of law i.e. when the court asks me to identify myself before proceeding, I am not merely 'Roger' as my full name must be
used. The Plaintiff in this matter 'Kris' of Cavanagh
LLP has the same problem not recognizing that the 'woke generation' has not
taken over...yet.
b)
The correct designation of this
filed motion by Cavanagh originally last November is CV20-
849830 not CVi0-84983 as Bacque would assert. Changing one letter on a password can confound
any transmission hence I refuse to recognize any further conduct of this case
until proper legal corrections are
made. Both the GG and Freeland are notified in order to oversee this correction
process. No Court transmissions were received by me on Feb. 10 or Feb. 11.
c) Technical glitches on the Feb. 11 vertical hearing could very well be the
source of Pierre Roger j's misguided directions
although those directions were perverted to such an extent compromising my side of the case that I found it necessary to request his recusal as of Mar.15
d) There was 'no previous day warning' from the
court as to this hearing which makes no recognition of my request
to be heard by teleconferencing which
is NOT the same as ZOOM as a judge must be made aware of the request
and approve accordingly.
e) The above information was included in material (Reply
25A) material to Justice Roger
but the Registry hamstrung the normal procedures through picayune
regulations. I have been dealing for many years, including the Ottawa courts in 2014,
without this kind of nonsense.
f) While Cavanagh LLP has supplied some written materials gratuitously on my behalf, I still
request direct written contact with the sitting judge cc Cavanagh
LLP on this matter. Hell, if both these lawyers
are able to make private
representations to judges as detailed
to the ON Legal Society (which
doesn't respond to its legal
news); why can't
I through a legal process?
3) Included with this
letter is a cancellation of CV20-84943
I made against
Alexander Biss. esq called to
the bar in 2017 (and already having
private side-bars with A.G. Deputy Justice Rosalind Conway (bench appt.
2018. These A.G.
appointments are particularly troublesome in
this
case) on Feb. 27 in SDC 19-SC-155235
(illicit mandamus/agreement settlement court where I called for her recusal
for failing to deal with the issues). There is some question as to
whether the Ottawa Registry filed CV20-84943,
Nonetheless, I am sending in a Form. 23A
Notice of discontinuance with this account. As there was never any response from Bissionnette; no expense was incurred by him. However, if a
legal fee is attached to any action which he launches such as the above CV:Z0-849830; then he should expect a
similar charge in the same amount. In brief, there is no realistic reason for Cavanagh LLP to proceed any further
4) The alleged conspiracy in this current CV20-849830 was conceived, it is asserted here, before I abandoned
all hope on December 31, 2020 of getting redress for my 35 year senior teacher
lay-off for economic reasons due to judicial malfeasance of over 50 judges
across Canada. I am only present currently as I am mimed as a frivolous and vexatious Respondent
· who has had my case usurped by this Plaintiff aping a similar
pattern in 2014
in Ontario {SEE website). My written offer to Roger j. to dismiss is still valid
until March 15-2021.
5) The allegation here is that Roger j. will insert a 'Trojan Horse'
into my affairs beyond the Employee's Case which
I have abandoned as noted above. That deprivation could be linked to the
existence of my website aping the
U.S. Patriot Act closing down so-called terrorist websites. That action, if
it materializes, would be the biggest criminal action in Canada as there is
no parallel to a Patriot Act. Columnist Lorne Gunter has raised the question as
far as the government through BILL C·10 performing such an 'internet' action
for Parliament. A similar carte blanche action by Roger j.
could achieve the same result for the judges.
6) A copy of this letter
is being sent to the Ottawa Registry
by mail to be forwarded to Roger j.
as well as Cavanagh LLP for forwarding
purposes to him,
7) The earlier request to the GG to represent me under 'we
the people' still stands.
Yours truly, Roger Callow February 23-2021
also cc l.,Gunter /
U.S. Professor V. Hanson (& Ottawa
Sun columnist)
MARCH 15-2021: TO-CAVANAGH l.LP
TO PRESENT TO THE COURT (APRIL 08)
cc?GOVERNOR
GENERAL of CANADA- (N.B. NO NEW APPT. MADE: WAGNER UNACCEPTABLE)
MARCH 16-2021 NEWSLETTER (MEDIA mar)
;!page
POST IN STAFFROOM-hit radio talk
shows QUOTES: THE PRESIDENT IS MISSING Bill Clinton {former
U.S. Pres./James Patterson)
1) ' ...that peaceful protest is one of the mast admirable forms of patriotism.'
2) 'Surrounding yourself
with sycophants and bootlickers is the surest
rout,; to failure.'
BACKGROUND:
(see NEWSLITTERS: March 01,15, 16-2021 (MEDIA mar) plus APRIL 08 Sub-heading
BY: Roger
Callow rogercol/ow.com {2021) 'KING OF THE WHISTLEBLOWERS' ...Time
to end this 35 year unresolved Judicial farce, the emptoyeescasecanado.ca which I did on DEC. 31-2020.
rile Employer won, I didn't nor did 38 million Canadians when
they lost Justice Canada due to systemic malfeasance"
dt'lstruction of democratic Canada in its totallty...The only answer is what one sees around
the world...hit the streets but please, no violence to people. It is a waste of
time voting under these circumstances in Canada.
THE THREAT (SEE Mar. 01 Newsletter for
complete details)
It's the algorithm, stupid, not the people... Canadians are so caught
up with the conspiracy against
Roger Callow, that they do not perceive thl'l rnal threat;
namely, the algorithm
which Franco Alulio, Deputy
Minister of Transport-Medical
in Ontario set up by which a targeted Individual such as myself can be
deprived of ;ll!_legal representation for any matter due to his bogus driver
license suspension failure of
the media to expose the Franco Alulio story
rank, right Lip there with the b/gge,t abLJse in Canadian society on
a par with what happened in Nazi G11rmany 1s 'Final Solution'. A. Eichmann; move over.
THE PRESENT (#2-4 from Mar. 01 Newsletter)
...2) Until the
question of my 'existence' is remedied by the Supreme Court of Canada (Under
Section 140, they can hear anything of a national concern and my suit against Alullo CV20-82943 hits
right at the core of thi, miscarriage of justice
under Ottawa Justice Pierre Roger whose
recusal I have called for. He would seek to eradicate previous matters under
'all issUl'lS' (CV20-82943)
without defining any one issue in CV20"849830
on
Apr.8-2021 where I am accused of being afrivo/ou, & vexatiot1s Respondent.
3) Hence being between
the Devil and the deep blue sea in the interim, I must rely on the Office of the
Governor General acting under 'we the people' to attend any hearings
above 'as a friend of Roger Callow'.
4) Without Individual social
media support from those reading
this NEWSLETTER, little
else can be done.
APRIL 08-2014 Oral
Argument (2 pages defined under March 15 NICWSLETTER)
March 16 - PARTY
POLITICS While the notion
of Party Politics
is not mentioned in
the BNA Act; it is the essence of our gov't
operation. Under this banner {SEE MEDIA mar),
I challenged 3 Opposition leaders
which did not respond completing the fall of Canada as a nation: FED: a)
Tory O'Toole b)NDP Singh PROV. ON Prov. Horwath (NOP) latter denies any correspondence which is
typical of NDP. O'Toole is not responding either.
Yours truly, Roger Callow
Respondent CV20-849830
SUN MEDIA columnists: Lorne Gunter & U.S.
Professor V.D. Hanson /cc Deputy Mini ter C.Freeland
MARCH 15-2021 NEWSLETTER (MEDIA mar)
POST IN STAFFROOM-hit radio talk
shows
BACKGROUND:
(see NEWSLETTER March 01 preliminary)
BY: Roger
Callow rogercal/ow.com (2021) 'KING OF THE
WHISTLEBLOWERS' ...Time to end
this 35 year unresolved Judicial
farce, the employeescasecanada,ca which
I did on DEC, 31-2020. The Employer
won, I didn't nor did 38 million Canadians when they lost Justice Cahada due
to systemic malfeasance= destruction of democratic Canada in Its
totality. The last Act is slated in an ottawa courtroom on April 08 -2021.
cc Deputy
P.M. Chrystia Freeland as the last Cam,dian authority left
standing, to either act or
get out of politics. As lrump did not see the threat to U.S.
interests, perhaps Pres. Biden will.(cc U.S.
Embassy-Ottawa)· cc SUN MEDIA's
Lorne Gunter who fears gov't. control
of internet through
BILL C·10. CV20-849830 is the
current parallel device to seize
internet control by the Cdn. Judges on April 08 where
I am the Re pondent,
The only answer is what one sees around the world...hit the streets
but please, no violence to pi;,ople. It is a waste of
time voting under these circumstance in Canada: VOTERS; FOOLS VOTING FOR OTHER fOOLS THE THREAT (SEE Mar. 01 Newsletter for complete
details)
It's the algorithm, stupid,
not the people... Canadians are so caught up with the conspiracy against
Roger Callow, that they do not perceive the real threat; namely, the
algorithm which Franco Alulio,
Deputy Minister of Transport-Medkal In Ontario set up by which a targeted individual such as myself can be
.deprived of Ml.legal representation for any matter due
to his bogus driver license
suspension. failure of
the media to expose the Frcmco Alulio story ranks
right up there
with the biggest
abuse in Canadian society on a par with what
happened in Nazi Germany's 'Final
Solution'. A. Eichmann; move over.
THE PRESENT
(#2·4 from Mar. 01Newsletter)
...2) Until the question of my 'existi;,nce'
is remedied by the Supreme Court of
Canada (Under Section 140, they can hear
anything of a national concern and my suit against Alulio
CV20-82943 hits right at the core of
this miscarriage of justice under Ottawa
Justice Pierre Roger whose recusal I have called for. He would seek to
eradicate previous matters under 'all issues' without defining
any one issue in
CV20·849830 on
Apr.8-2021 where I am accused of being a frivoloV'.i & vexatious Respondent.
3)
Hence being
between the Devil and the deep blue sea in the interim, I must rely on the Office of the
Governor
General a ting under 'we the people' to attend any hearings above 'as a friend of Roger
callow'.
4) Without individual social media support
from those reading
this NEWSLETTER, little
else can be done.
APRIL 08-2014 Oral Argument
1) March 15 has come and gone
without either the Applicants dropping their case considering that in February
I dropped my case against them with Justice Roger given until March 15 to
dispose of CV20·849830 without repercussions from me in an offer he failed to meet. Hence this Newsletter details all those arguments under the
heading of 'all issues' which the Applicants
request but do not detail.
Following is a list of those issues
which I ask to be dealt
with in writing on a Party by Party basis to ensure that Roger j. stays on
topic. A blanket rejection of the following issues,
particularly the one related to Franco Alulio, would lead to a
request
by me for Roger j's
removal from the
entire judiciary in
Canada. My concern
here is that a 'one-liner' will
be used to ghost very serious accusations: e.g. The court rules that the Respondent is guilty in all matters
before this court of being frivolous & vexatious and costs wiil follow
to the Applicant. Further the Respondent is barred from any future court
dealings related to the topic of his employment dispute. My presence in
such a court would be
redundant to
say the least.
1) I submit that the key to Roger j. ls to eliminate all action by Roger Callow beyond the immediate appeal by the two
lawyers against which I have made written accusations offraud
to the ON Legal Society. These two young
lawyers from small
legal outfits did not
respond but their objection is made
redundant in that in February, I withdrew the charge. Should Roger j. include any mention of this charge
in his Decision; I would expect him to call for details
on this issue from me or the
ON Legal Society, Copious materials abound.
2) Other central issues
which could lead to an Appeal even though I have no faith in Ottawa
Court Appeals dating from 2014, are:
a) The court must not accept this case due to it
being improperly re-arranged by the Ottawa Court. The filed number is CV20-849830 not CV20-84983. I have Invited the Applicant to refile
under an e11tirely new number if they are so intent on getting a Decision.
There was no response.
b)
I await a Decision
of the new Governor General
which is being
kept aware of legal problems
here as is Deputy Minister Chrystia
Freeland. Until my identity as a native born Canadian is established due to the
reprehensible Franco Alullo algorithm, I ask that the
GG attend the April 08 hearing as 'a friend of Roger Callow' His authority to
act Is under 'we the people', The GG
would request the court to provide questions
to be answered by both the Applicant and this Respondent on outstanding issues.
Frivolous and vexatious considerations
would not be
entertained at this time. I believe I can
function under written answers apart from court hearings.
c)
As to the
original teacher lay-off in B.C, in June of 1985 under the imposed BILL 35 of which
arbitration
was quashed leaving
me in limbo without any compensation
for 35 yearsj Roger j. can order me
back to work as I am still an employee of the West Vancouver School Board
albeit an unpaid one or cause the Supreme Court
of Canada (four
such Appeals were neutered
earlier at this level) under Section 140 to act under the heading of a national
issue as this
case
has been in almost every province plus the
Federal Court. In short, 'no answer' cannot be a 'legal answer' to an unresolved
legal n,atter. In colloquial terms; the judge
may not pick up the legal ball and go home before
a Decision is assigned; being frivolous
and vexatious
notwithstanding.
2
d) The key to the fraudulency of the original
lay-off lies in the minute notes of July 1985 in which legal Counsel Stuart
Clyne, it is alleged here,
fraudulently redesigned the vote. There
are no limitations on fraud. Anything flowing from a fraud is 'null and
void'. Again Roger j. is in a position to make those requests e.g. a judicial
review in order to retain credibility in the Canadian Justice System on a major
topic relating to employee compensation. As matters stand from this case
precedent, a powerful Employer may escape his fiduciary obligations to
dismissed employees including pension rights.
e)
Mention of Deputy Justice
Rosalind Carter in a Feb.27-2020 mandamus/agreement
settlement conference failed to deal with the issues tracing back to the Alulio suspension. I called for her recusal. In that
informal hearing, I brought up the fact that lawyer Bissionnette
(B,) against who I have the current action, ordered the police on a wellness check
which 8. denied: 'I never did'. 'The police said you did and I believe the
police,' I retorted.
Now that B. is under oath, the court is obliged to check out with the
police on that point and, if shown to be the case, to charge him with public
mischief.
f)
The young lawyer representing B.,
Ken Dixon of Cavanagh LLP did something Sarkozy of
France was recently
jailed three years
for doing; namely,
clandestinely visiting a judge, A.G. ,
Master Kaufmann, surreptitiously whom amazingly wrote a judgment for him during
the COVID lockdown of March 2020. That unsanctioned action forms very much a
part of my request for the Ottawa Court to be placed under a Trusteeship.
g)
Master Kaufmann
was also instrumental in dropping my Action against
Justice C. Macleod
of
the Ottawa Court who in turn dropped my $10 million action c1gainst the
Ottawa General Hospital where I became their first political prisoner. No
hearing was called by Macleod j. thereby changing the very fabric
of Canadian Justice
in a fundamental fashion. Cavanagh LLP would
make reference in a general
sense to all the above matters perverting them, I submit,
to show advantage to themselves largely through the 'omission of fact'.
3)
In conclusion, there are good grounds to submit that I have been the target of a massive
conspiracy involving an Employer with their
legal Counsel, the Courts of Law, and the Politicians concerned. Hence if Roger j.'s actions
parallel early Decisions from over 50 judges,
this matter will go on for years, if not in the court, in the forum of publlc opinion. The Alulio
algorithm, for example, negatively impacts all North American drivers. As I
have voluntarily ended my involvement in the Employee's Case as of Dec.31-2020; it makes no logical sense
to 'flog a dead horse'. As to outside
settlement In order
to obey the legal niceties, I have offered the Employer a settlement price
which is 1/40th of the current $20 million cost of settlement. Keep in mind
that a civil case is all about financial settlement.
Yours truly, Roger Callow
Respondent CV20-849830 NOT CV20-84983 cc
SUN MEDIA columnists: Lorne Gunter & U.S. Professor V.D. Hanson cc Deputy
Minister Chrystia Freeland
NEWSLETTER
APRIL 01 (written March 17-2021} for Apr. 08 Hearing
1) Perhaps there
are those who believe my MARCH 16 (SEE
MARCH 2021) i11sert was done with
some bravado considering that it was
written a week previously. Not so as the
conspirators' u11iverse unravels as it will...and
I am there to catch them out at every step. 111 that process, it doesn't help me that the myopic media has
boycotted the biggest challenge to
Canada and Canadian Society since its inception by limiting itself
to looking through
the big end of the telescope
at every Issue solely in terms of its
political slant. I call it political cowardice. All Canadians are poorer on
this account.
2) First of all, whom do I mean by the conspirators behi11d CVZ0·849830 which the Ottawa Courts
renamed CV20·84983 creating
confusion::: 'Trusteeship' which Is no doubt part of the scam. The real conspirators, however, sit in the Justice
Building on Wellington Street in Ottawa (reputed to be the most highly
stressed building in Canada for good reason,
but I digress) with such as
Ottawa Court's Pierre Roger j. and the young 'Bobbsey
Twin' lawyers • the latter charged with fraud for different reasons - merely
being the messenger boys. Of course that connection disappears at the slightest hint of trouble leaving
the messengers to take the flak.
3) The current
conspiracy was set in October 2020 before it was known that I would put a
voluntary end to the Employee's Case as of Dec.31-2020 for I was just butting
my head against corrupt Judges and politicians. After 35 years, there was no
longer any se11se to adding defiance to
denial. Canada effectively ended its nationhood, however that be defined, but
one thing is clear; the individual in our society has been deprived of due
process under the laws. Added to this departure by rne
was the dropping of the legal action against the two lawyers in Feb. 2021
making any hearing on that point moot which ostensibly, is what CV20•849830 is all about. Personally, I
couldn't give a rat's ass about the Justice System 'protecting 011e of.its
ow11' which is the expected result; the ON Legal Society - which
does not answer its legal mail - 11otwithstanding,
4) The real issue which the court would like to 'disappear' is the Franco Alulio Algorithm with me along with
it (SEE websites;
employeescasecanada.ca & rogercal/ow.com)
which condemns all N. American drivers to the heinous action
of a bureaucrat through a perverted driver
license suspension scam and in that process aping,
as it does, the 'final solution' of NAZI Germany which is a 'clear and present danger'
to all N. American drivers.
I have detailed those
concerns in March 2021NEWSLETTERS. The secondary issue
is to drive me off the internet;
a challenge paralleling BILL ClO in which the
Feds would like to seize Internet control from Google. This case would parallel
those results for the Judges. Hence I am insistent that any questions being
raised in this court by Roger j. be done so in writing in order to thwart this
political agenda. No doubt the court mistakenly believes that they can contain
this algorithm to a single case. Considering that one is dealing with an algorithm; that is an impossibility.
Much easier to defend a double negative; another impossibility. As a side note, snail mail and fax
communication are not subject
to adulteration such as the internet
is prone and has been my
prime means of promulgating the Employee's Case. I leave the Social Media to others.
5)
I have asked the Governor General
under 'we, the people' to represent me in court
as I
currently have no legal identity
as one consequence of the Alulio algorithm.
6) While I was prepared to include the aberrant 'psychiatric'
algorithm under the Dec.31-2020 declaration; I will not now as the case takes
on a new dimension with a focus on the Medical Profession aka the Psychiatric extension. My experience here parallels a WS program
pointing out how this megalithic organization will spend $100,000
to protect a Doctor against
a $10,000 malpractice suit
which abound in Canada. For the Medical oversight body, 90% of their costs are covered
by the taxpayers...go figure.
7)
But those charges were not done for medical malpractice
in my case which led to a 9-day
lock-down in the secure wing of the Ottawa
Hospital at Xmas 2019 making me their first 'political prisoner'; even after I
passed all medical tests ordered by a fake court order (SEE internet for details), I sued both the Doctor,
young family Dr. A. Jahagirdar of Southgate Family Medicine clinic, and the Ottawa General
Hospital for $10 million each. As the Medical
Insurance could hardly
hide that expenditure; enter Ottawa Court's
Justice C. Macleod
whom, on his own volition and without taking
argument, quashed both
actions as being
'frivolous and vexatious'; a favourite 'get
out of jail free card'
for judges in trouble. The course of Canadian
Justice was changed at the 'stroke of a pen' by that action for now all powerful litigants
will
merely 'buy
the judge'. A.G.'s Master Kaufman used the same routine to drop the case which
I subsequently laid against Macleod j.
using the same cover story. Roger j. would like to sanction those actions; no doubt through a
general amnesty for the perpetrators
which is a farce. He is not the U.S.
President.
8)
Jf
you google my name (Google sells their space), you
will see the emphasis is placed on
favouring the big guy Employer. (While
I publish biogs; the Employee's Case was never
really an Internet matter; rather, a 'snail mail' matter which I began in the latter 80's -I was laid off for economic reasons under the Imposed BILL 35 (B.C. 1985) -
followed up with a fax option which I use to the current day.) One such miscreant
is Justice. C. McKinnon whose 2014 Decision paralleling this one where, once
before, I was also the Respondent having my own case usurped when I was overwritten by this kind of stunt.
One of the 3 Decisions
he wrote ori
the
same event appears on Google; the two other mutually exclusive Decisions do
not (Would the real Colin McKinnon
please stand up?). Even here, I have no
way of knowing whether any of his Decisions was filed and if it was,
was it later removed?...our courts are just that corrupt.. The Employer's
lawyer, Hicks, Morley, et al departed the
scene hurriedly without asking for a paycheck. Now a second like-minded stunt
is scheduled for Apr. 08 2021.
9)
The B.C. Teachers Union was wild in this 'sweetheart deal' when I changed lawyers
in 1986
with the court quashing the arbitration ruling the arbitrator to be patently unreasonable. He had converted
16 new hires to read 16 lay-offs with the 17th to be me knowing full well. that
there were no other lay-offs in June of 1985. No West Vancouver School Board
member took the stand to testify (perjure themselves) as to lay-off numbers.
Justice Southin in 1986 called for all materials
regarding my lay-off but returned key documents illustrating fraud on the part
of Stuart Clyne QC in holding a second secretive
meeting In July where he 'restructured' the School Board vote. Southin should have charged him with fraud. She also tried
to escape censure by returning those notes, with the Union confiscating my copy
which they hold to this day refusing to provide me my rightful
copy. Significance? If fraud is shown, everything flowing from it Is null and void. In this case, I would be returned
to the job with all back pay plus interest (35 years worth). Currently, I am
still an employee of the Board albeit an unpaid one. That is the crime of over SO judges
who, in effect,
ruled my claim for compensation under the
law to be frivolous and
vexatious when in fact that label is more aptly applied to themselves.
Will
Roger j. under discussing 'all issues' call for that disclosure; in essence calling over 50 judges liars? I think not.
Much easier to sink the entire SS
Titanic Judicial System than to call for
a reckoning of the biggest scam for any democratic country.
Our very institutions have been lost for all time as the torpedoes have
been damned over and over again and still missed the target. For a mixed
analogy, it is a little like taking a 852 stratofortress
to bomb a mosquito...and missing. One does not get to refer to the continued
existence of 'the Old Boy's Club'
under those circumstances. That is why I have called for this PLACARD to be
added to all street protests in N. America: JUSTICE FOR ROGER CALLOW ... that support is needed now.
10)
Hence the new direction focused
on in this trial is primarily on the disclosure of
the fake
psychiatric evidence - or lack thereto - of ON Deputy Minister
of Transport, Franco Alullo, whom I submit should
be tried with the equivalent charge of treason.
11)
One thing which I have to be on guard against in this civil issue
is that Roger j. does not
seek a way to attach criminal proceedings against me to this civil
issue.
12) As of March 17, as earlier
offered, the following
opportunities are rescinded: a}Roger j.
to drop case b) Bobbsey Twins to
drop case c) WV School Board to settle for 1/40 of asking
$20 million.
Roger Callow Amour de Cosmos but not Cda - no thanks
to Premier Ford & AG Doug Downey
cc SUN media columnists, L. Gunter & U.S.
Professor, V. Hanson
P.S, No response from the Civil Liberties
Union nor CAA (Northwest ON President)
SJC
Assistants (Ottawa Court 5th Floor) March 16-2021. (Below is Callow response)
1)
Above
received by e-mail from SJC on March 16-2021 and shows an
abysmal lack
of knowledge on this matter from Feb. 11-2021, the date of this information to the present. You may see that pertinent
correspondence on my website rogercallow.cam
MARCH 2021 MEDIA in
which I call for the recusal of Roger j, if he did not drop CV20-849830
NOT CV20-84943 by today (Mar.16-2021)
Z) Cavanagh LLP had been asked to provide that
material to the court as the court has bungled communication on my part. Apparently
they didn't forward any information if this account is any example hence your
Feb. 22 missive to me is 'marching to the tune of a different drummer'.
3) The central argument is that, as I have no
legal identity as per the ramifications of the Franco Alulio algorithm false license
suspension which negatively impacts any legal
standing which I have,
I must resort to the Office of the Governor
G_eneral to represent me under 'we the people'
on April 8 hence any arrangements to be made
are to be with the GG. There is no other recourse. They have been informed of my request.
4)
Three offers made to Roger j., Cavanagh LLP, and the west Vancouver School Board for an
outside settlement expire
today. A three
page analysis under
APRIL OB rogercal/ow.com
will appear tomorrow outlining the new course of events.
Yours truly, Roger Callow
Respondent In a matter usurped by the
Applicant to avoid providing a response to my action previously laid CV20-84943 against Bissonnette
esq. (That stunt is a repeat of 2014 in which a judge acted fraudulently, See letter under April OB tomorrow.
March 24-2021
TO: l<ris Dixon (Associate #58019M (Ll))
of Cavanagh LLP by fax:
613-569-8668 ( pages) cc Deputy Minister C. Freeland by
fax: 613-996-9607 with enclosures (2 pages ON
gov't.)
From: Roger
Callow Respondent in CV20-849830 H.D. Apr.08-2021 by vertical procedures
t:
613-521-1739 employeescasecanada,ca to Dec.31-2020 / rogercallow,com from Jan. 2021
ACTION
REQUIRED
1) For Deputy Minister C. Freeland to call for a
Royal Enquiry into all matters relating to the senior teacher lay-off in 1985 of Roger Callow
for solely economic reasons under the auspices
of the imposed BILL 35 B.C. 1985
which goes unresolved to
this day where
no compensation
has been paid
including pension rights. The Justice system has been turned upside down in
nine provinces due to judicial malfeasance leaving me still as an employee of the
Board albeit an unpaid one. Canada's Justice System is the prime casualty
including individual rights in Canada leaving Canadians at large without a
viable Justice System"' anarchy.
2) As I was going nowhere
with the courts of law,
I voluntarily put an end to all legalities as of
Dec.31-2021; the end date of my first
web site: employeescasecanada.ca That
should have been the end of the affair vis a vis the law courts.
Unfortunately, CV20-849830 (not CV20-
84983 as the Registry altered it) has been pursued by the
Applicants where I am an unwilling Respondent considering that I formally
dropped the case against the two young lawyers for fraud in February, 2021
giving them and Justice Rogers the
opportunity to drop
out thus ending this long drawn
out affair. Cavan.igh LLP steadfastly
refused to drop their very weak case bringing into focus the
material filed with the ON Legal Society against them. That Body does not acknowledge
their legal mail hence Rogers j will have to provide a court Order to that
effect should he choose to pursue any aspect
of this Applicant's
action. Conversely, he can just
drop this 'meaningless Action' due to my declar d
departure from Canada's Law Courts.
3) The Applicant,
by being adamant in pursuing this case, forces me to qualify credentials;
particularly as it relates to Judges (as well as to Kris Dixon of Cavanagh LLP). Included in this letter only to Freeland, is
the confidential 2 page letter from the Ontario Judicial Council regarding the status
of judges involved in this matter in ON (since 2014). They are all originally
Federal Court appointees (including Rogers j.) making the Canadian Council of Judges, under the SCofC
and not the Provincial body as the operant oversight institution. That body has never acknowledged
their mail by me to them on this level.
QUESTIONS
TO KRIS DIXON of CAVANAGH LLP WHERE HE IS LISTED AS AN 'ASSOCIATE'
4)
a) Do you have a
clear record with the ON Legal Society?
b} I notice that you are a graduate
of the UofOttawa in 2002 where you list yourself as being associated with the Common Law Section. Were you were ever called
to the Bar? It appears that your career up to 2016 was related
to real estate. Were legal qualifications required in that role? Roles you
played since that time Involved a legal degree but I do not see any · evidence
of later university courses confirming a call to the bar.
c) I notice a Kris Dixon was an ESL Teacher in Korea In 2015. Was
that you? If so, were you ever a teacher in Canada? Where and when if applicable.
d) One matter appears pre-eminent; namely that you are well-connected
behind the scene with Ottawa Courts as evidenced by your Illicit connection
with A.G.'s Master Kaufmann whom,
surprisingly, acceded to your private submissions. That is a major reason why I
have called for a Trusteeship to be placed over the Ottawa Courts. If you
Intend to 'discuss all issues', this is a key
one.
e) Normally, as a beginning lawyer,
one apprentices with
a large legal
Company. I did not see any
such record on your.account. If so, which Company
and where?
f)
I still think it is in the best
interest of all concerned for Cavanagh LLP to drop
this case as I no,
longer have the least bit of Interest
dealing any longer
with the Canadian
legal system. I will have to obtain succor elsewhere.
- ACDL_
Roger Callow Respondent CVZ0-849830
cc SUN
columnists L Gunter/ U.S. Professor V. Hanson/
Deputy Minister C. Freeland cc Rogers j, in care of the Ottawa Court Registry.