Nov. 28-2020

Callow Rebuttal sent to K. Dixon by e-mail pages Reference: Bissonnette (B) v.Callow CV20- 849830

Callow Response to e-mail sent by Cavanagh LLP's Kris Dixon representing B. in a matter of civil fraud referenced to the

Ontario Legal Society which does not respond to its legal mail on this topic and until it does, the above case is stillborn. Regrettably, A.G. Doug Downey, does not respond to the progenitor case in this matter; namely, the charge of fraud against Deputy Minister ofTransport - Medical (my under-lining), Franco Alulio, as your factum above references this matter of my illicit driver license suspension as being conducted under the Minister of Transport; an entirely different body with a separate address and personnel. An honest judge would throw your factum out on those grounds alone, but that is the central point, the Ottawa courts have failed miserably in appointing credible judges to this case explaining why I petitioned Justice Minister David Lametti to impose a trusteeship over Ottawa Courts. As there was no response, copies of my communication are directed to Chrystia Freeland, Deputy Minister and to Walter E. Williams, U.S. Economics professor and itinerant columnist for the Ottawa Sun as Alulio's actions present a clear and present danger to the U.S. driving public if this matter is not nipped in the bud. Alulio did not respond to my $10 million Action on his perfidy which underlies all other successive legal cases: CV20-82943

Other points:

1) Your bravado is well rewarded considering your private approach to Master Kaufman whom, rather than sending you away 'with a flea in your ear'; actually wrote a Decision knowing full well that he was acting in a fraudulent manner by not notifying me of any hearing.

2) You list my correspondence of March 17, 19, and 26 without detailing any rebuttal to my very serious complaints. But then, the judges on the Ottawa Court never ask. That's the real crime here plus of course, the failure of the oversight bodies in this matter compounding the problem.

3) I wrote the court on August 28 with regards to the re-opening of the court and outstanding cases which I have filed. There was no response and yet you do get a response on your listed case above.

4) Mar. 31 e-mail from Dixon:To suggest that my attack on Justice C. Macleod CVZ0-82847 (later dropped by Master Kaufman without taking argument as well) as both acted without a file no. against The Ottawa Hospital CV 20-82847 and Dr. Jahagirdar (Dr. J,)of Towngate Family Medicine for fraud CVZ0-83096 as being 'a collateral attack' by you is to place the cart before the horse. Further linking this observation to a duly held trial on Feb. 27 before Justice Rosalind Conway 19-SC-155235, in a different court structure is reflective of your ineptitude as a lawyer. However, judges assigned to the Employee's Case obviously do not look beyond their noses.

5) I am available for hearings on any of the above matters from January onward and enclose a copy of this letter to the Ottawa Courts for the purpose. Who knows, maybe this time I will get lucky and they will respond to all outstanding cases to be heard in this matter. I would be available by teleconferencing which has been my custom for a number of years now particularly as the case depends on disclosure of my entire medical file to ascertain whether Dr. J. made any

recommendation to the Transport Division-Medical for the suspension of my driver's license for 'psychiatric reasons' as quoted in Alulio's unsubstantiated suspension. That would take 5 minutes. As it does not seem that your client or yourself is willing to divulge that disclosure for reasons 'best known to yourself' apart from technicalities, it will be left to the court (as was the case before Justice Conway on Feb. 27 whom I asked to recuse herself for cover-up and improper hearing techniques giving your B. a private sidebar before I was called in which radically changed the nature of that court) to order the production of said disclosure. Without that revelation, there is no point to holding any trial.

6) As matters stand, there is no connection between Dr. J. and Franco Alulio hence his action is ultra vires but I must have a court date for CV20-82943 which is the focus of all subsequent cases before any other case related to this matter is heard. Further, until the ON Law Society gets off their duff and report on my very serious accusations on my part against both B. and yourself as his legal representative, your CV20-849830 is stillborn.

7) If this matter were before any other than the Ottawa Courts, I claim that you would be laughed out of court requesting that very serious accusations against both lawyers and judges be dismissed as being frivolous and vexatious. However, as your case is registered in Ottawa, hence your request to dismiss based on past Ottawa Court Decisions from 2014 onward is a frightening commentary on the Justice System of Canada.

8} You can still put an end to the current imbroglio by producing the redacted letter by Dr. J. on Oct.15-2019 after receiving 'an information' from whom we do not know nor do we know to whom she wrote in response and what was said. Send me that and I will drop my case against B. and my charges against you and B. with the (useless) ON Legal Society. In all likelihood, Dr. J. was being asked to condone Alulio's illicit driver license suspension. Further, your case could just as easily have been filed as a Defence to my CV20-82889 against B = billable time nonsense.

Yours truly, Roger Callow

cc U.S. Professor Williams /Chrystia Freeland/ Justice Minister D. Lametti / ON A.G. Doug Downey/ Ottawa Superior Court Registry

DEC. 01 Response from Roger Callow Respondent to Cavanagh LLP's (inaccurate account)

1) The above e-mail was received Dec.01-2020

2) Enclosed here is a one-page letter to the ON legal Society dated Nov. 30 updated with this e-mail Dec. 01 with a copy to the Ottawa Courts (Nathalie Bondy Local Registrar) which still refuses to communicate with me on other cases earlier listed on this matter.

Yours truly, Roger Callow

November 30-2020 (sent Nov.30-2020)

TO: Ontario Law Society FROM: Roger Callow - litigant in many cases

Osgoode Hall 130 Queen St. W. #2001-1285 Cahill Dr. Ottawa, KlV 9A7 Toronto, ON MSH 2N6 web: emploveescasecanada.ca RECENT 7 nov. LEGAL MAIL

t. 416-947-3315 f. 416-947-5263 (blocked) t. 613-521-1739

MESSAGE: 5 pages including this one

1) The key to the 3-page July 3-2020, letter to the Law Society regarding apparent fraud by two Ottawa lawyers - A. Bissonnette and K. Dixon - is that it goes without a response from the Law Society. Nor does the Society appear to read their legal mail in other submissions which I have made to them over a period of time.

2) Page 4 dated November 24-2020 in response to an action CV20-0084930 involving these two lawyers in a filing made by them could just as easily have been written as a Defense to my CV20 82993. Currently, I have called for a trusteeship to be invoked over the Ottawa courts due to their machinations including these two lawyers. The situation is just that bad.

3) In either case, this matter depends heavily on a detailed analysis of the alleged fraud which I have provided the ON Law Society on both lawyers. Without that investigation, Ontario is looking at yet another kangaroo court.

4) Regrettably, empty appeals to Deputy Minister, Chrystia Freeland as the 'last politician left standing' in this sorry affair leaves me appealing to our U.S. neighbors to intervene in Canadian matters as a protection against U.S. commercial interests.

5) It would seem that this letter is to be yet one more document if there is no proper response from the ON Legal Society in a Canadian Justice System which has gone bad.

Yours, in disappointment, Roger Callow Dec.01-2020

On Tue, 1 Dec 2020 at 10:53, Kris Dixon <KDixon@cavanagh.ca> wrote:

Good morning,

I am the lawyer for the applicant in the above referenced application. I attach here a copy of the notice of application.

This is an application for an order, inter a/ia, that the respondent is a "vexatious litigant" as that term is defined in accordance with section 140 of the Courts of Justice Act, RSO 1990, c. C43.

Our client will be relying on Rules 14.05(2), 21 and 38 of the Rules of Civil Procedure, R.R.O. 1990, Reg. 194, and section 140(1) of the Courts of Justice Act, R.S.O. 1990, c C.4.

We are seeking the following dates for a two hour hearing before a judge:

Yours truly,

Kris

Kristopher L. Dixon

CAVANAGH

400-411 Roosevelt Avenue, Ottawa ON K2A 3X9 Tel.: 613.780.2027 (direct) I Fax: 613.569.8668

KDixon@cavanagh.ca I www.cavanagh.ca

ORAL ARGUMENT· A PERSPECTIVE ON CV20-849830 - (FEB. 11-2021 Hearing Date)

BY: RESPONDENT Roger Callow in 'Bissonnette vs Callow' (Bissonnette (B.) is a lawyer represented by Cavanaugh LLP's Kris Dixon, both of whom I have accused of malfeasance to the Ontario Legal Society. That body has never responded to any of the very serious legal

concerns which I have written about these two of which a detailed Report is a major factor in these current legal events. Hence a follow-up hearing must be scheduled by this court.

BACl(ROUND:

1) In 2013, the B.C. Courts expelled plaintiff Roger Callow from the B.C. Justice System for 'reasons best known to a judge' in an unresolved labour matter where no compensation had been paid dating back to 1985. The matter reverted to courts across Canada plus the Federal court in order to get redress for, as an employee laid off for economic reasons from my senior teaching position in June of 1985 under B.C.'s neophyte imposed BILL 35, I was entitled to

· compensation whether it be under Bill 35, the collective bargaining process, or any other code relating to employment matters. I have sued the West Vancouver School Board in many courts of law with the current outside non-prejudiced settlement offer of $20 million. All judges, and there have been over 50 across Canada rely on the frivolous and vexatious rules, it is submitted here, to duck out of their responsibilities.

2) The Ontario phase of this case begins in 2014 and is the progenitor of the current case relating to the Premier Doug Ford government seeking to hamstring my case with a fake driver's license suspension by Ministry of Transport-Medical, Franco Alulio with whom I have a $10 million action against him for which he failed to respond: CV20-82943. On his own recognizance and without taking argument, he perverted the driver suspension form in Oct. of 2019 to read psychiatric disorder, a term which cannot be tested in medicine, with a number of medical clinics turning the re-testing down. Further, a lawyer I had on other matters dropped off with the use of the above mentioned term stating correctly, that no lawyer could represent me under these circumstances. Hence I represent myself legally. Oversight bodies

e.g. Ontario A.G. Doug Downey do not respond to my requests on this dangerous precedent leading me to turn to the U.S. as this stunt could easily turn into a 'cottage industry' for organized crime. Many other Canadian politicians, institutions, and media have also turned their back. If President Trump is unwilling to act to protect U.S. interests, then it is incumbent on President Biden to act in lieu of the Canadian authorities.

3) No connection has been shown between the actions which remain undefined by Alulio and any medical Doctor although it would appear that a redacted letter on October 15 immediately before the suspension letter to take effect on November 01-2019, from my former medical Doctor, the young Dr. Jahagirdar (Dr. J,) ofTowngate Family Medicine, appeared to have some knowledge for which the current request for disclosure was made from Bissonnette (B). That request promoted, I submit, the following shenanigans from B.

4) The following is a pejorative account on my part. B. sought to deflect my claim for disclosure

from Dr. J. by claiming that the Clinic had no say in such as the disposition of a Doctor's medical file. That was the issue before Small Claims Court Justice Rosalind Conway on February 27-2020 which, under highly unusual circumstances, she failed to act on that question. I called for her recusal in which she had met privately with B. before I was called into the hearing, She altered the terms of B.'s presentation to me from a 'Mandamus Court' to one of a 'Dispute Resolution Court' not telling me who, indeed, called for this court in the first place, 'There is no such thing as a mandamus court' she opined. Unfortunately the Law Society has failed miserably in not reporting on this debacle. In that Feb. 27 meeting, I stated that I had no argument with the two lawyers and was quite willing to drop all charges against them if I was provided with my entire medical file which is my property and not that of a medical Doctor. Mayor Jim Watson and Police Chief P. Sloly were remiss In not acting on my request to seize the remainder of my file without which, at age 79, I cannot get another Doctor.

5) On August 28, I asked the Ottawa Superior Court as to the status of cases I had filed, Yet, Dixon esq, has no problem accessing the courts even behind the scenes during the recent lock down in terms of approaching Master l<aufman without my knowledge and certainly without my consent. The amazing thing is that l<aufman even wrote a Decision for Dixon. Hence, by rights, Dixon should not be representing B. I ask the court here to determine that question.

6) On Dec. 02, I received back my rebuttal factum from the Court contesting the Plaintiff's argument stating that they would provide evidence In court as opposed to providing it to me currently for my review. One such appeal from Saskatoon in 2018 to New Brunswick courts currently for fraud is based on the B.C. lawyer faking an unrelated 500 word factum from a previous court session with a clever cover letter by that lawyer which fooled the Judge but, here is my point, the judge ordered that document to be placed in my hands revealing that subterfuge before I returned to court leading to an Action in New Brunswick for fraud. (In 2014, an ON justice, C. McKinnon, created 3 different Decisions on the same matter; none referencing the other='would the real Colin McKinnon please stand up'. There was no investigation from the Cdn. Council of Judges.) The Ottawa court's rejection which I returned with my documents was on a spurious Original Affidavit Required which is not detailed in Form 18A. It seems that with digital hearings, such paper arguments which always appear in court may be sidetracked in digital format. I request that the judge ask for my Respondent submission should the Registrar have failed to pass along this vital material which I returned.

7) A central question for the Registrar is why the Plaintiffs in CV20"849830 are able to supplant my previously laid cases making their case redundant? On those grounds alone, the above case should be thrown out of court with costs to me, Their case has been scheduled for Feb. 11 at 10 A.M. for two hours. I still have no dates for my cases.

8) While I include reference to media personalities, the situation is such that only President Biden can make any difference to a nation bent on rack and ruin - assuming Trump does nothing - in taking down with it, as it does, the USA.

ACTION REQUIRED:

1) Dismiss Claim of B. and Dixon with costs for being frivolous and vexatious.

2) Order either these two lawyers or the Ottawa police to acquire my complete medical file. If I get that, I will drop all claims against these two lawyers as stated in court on Feb.27-2020.

3) Take those steps which would require the ON Legal Society to give a detailed Report on the activities of these two lawyers based on information which I have provided to them.

3) Call for the disclosure of the B.C. West Vancouver School Board meeting notes in July of 1985 by their legal counsel which led to a court Decision by Justice Mary Southin in 1986 to quash the arbitration favouring the Board ruling, in that process, the arbitrator to be patently unreasonable. The ordered re-arbitration never took place. I have since been left in limbo.

4) Ensure that my original rebuttal to CV20-849830 is included in this court hearing.

IN CONCLUSION, it is a major critique that such a nation as Canada has to go begging for justice to a foreign nation. The 35 year unresolved employeescasecanada.ca has reflected the fact that Canada does not have a Justice System; rather, merely a Legal System under the aegis of corrupt and corruptible judges and chief justices. This case did not create this debacle; it merely reflects what has been going on for decades in Canada but recently, has taken a turn for the worst. As matters stand, no Canadian can trust to a Canadian court of law. In brief, President Biden, Canada needs your help.

MESSAGE:

l) This application to Chrystia Freeland, Deputy P.M. is a last ditch request by this writer to assign 'a friend of Roger Callow' to represent him in this court. An earlier letter to which there was no response from Freeland was written due to the failure of ON A.G. Doug Downey & Minister of Justice, David Lametti, to act on very serious allegations by this writer.

Respectfully submitted, Roger Callow 'The Outlawed Canadian' snuffed out by all Canadian institutions including the politicians, courts and media. Only Chrystia Freeland can save the day for Canada with a quick resolution to the Employee's case.

2) The request in 1) above is that, due to the Franco Alulio fake driver license suspension of this targeted driver, I cannot acquire a lawyer on any basis for any matter; a direct rejection of the Human Rights code, I laid an Action against Alulio (CV20-82943) for usurping the law to which he has never replied nor will the Ottawa Court provide a hearing date. Only Dixon's Application gets filed as all my other filed actions are ignored by the Ottawa Court.

3) The essence of the 14 page Plaintiff Application is found in the first Section on p. 1:

1. To declare the Respondent Roger Callow as being a 'vexatious litigant'; standard boiler-plate law which courts use with abandon to duck their judicial responsibilities.

2. A court Order muzzling this Respondent in pursuing legal redress.

3. A court Order blocking the pursuit of filed actions '...in any way pertaining to the circumstances giving rise to the suspension of his driving privileges....' In brief, the algorithm created by Franco Alulio, Deputy Minister of Transport,Medical, becomes de facto law negatively affecting all drivers in North America.

4. A bid to eradicate CV20-82889 for fraud against B, without having the benefit of an ON Legal Society Report.

5. A preposterous request of the court permitting B. and his representative, Dixon, whom is also a subject of fraud with the ON Legal Society for separate reasons, to never having to respond to any legal action I may choose to pursue; in essence, their Point 1. Dixon, an ESL teacher in S. Korea in 2015, a new member to the bar, thought nothing of privately approaching the A.G.'s Master Kavanagh whom, amazingly, wrote a private Decision for him. This same Master, without a trial, earlier dropped my action against Ottawa's Justice Macleod (CV20-83096) thus changing the entire dynamic of the Canadian Justice System in which powerful interests (think SNC Lavalin) may avoid court trials altogether.

6. 'costs of this application, on a substantial indemnity basis....' And these two 'Bobbsey Twins'

(Internet label) expect to be rewarded for their chicanery,

ACTION OF THIS COURT REQUESTED BY THE RESPONDENT

4) i will be available by telephone from 10 A.M. for the 2 hour hearing on Feb. 11-2021. I prohibit the court from proceeding unless a telephone connection is made. Freeland is asked to oversee this feature.

5) The hearing should take less than 5 minutes as my request relates to disclosure of the following:

a) The original application (CVZ0-180006950) which the Premier Ford gov't inherited from the Liberals relating to Employer and Unloh notes regarding the lay-off of this senior teacher for economic reasons in June of 1985 under the imposed BILL 35 (B.C. 1985) in which no compensation has been paid. A second illicit lay-off meeting in July, 1985, by the Employer, the West-Vancouver School Board, was fraudulently conducted which, if proven, leaves all action 'null and void' by the Employer. It is those notes submitted to the B.C. court In 1986

which are at question. Both Employer and Union have copies denied to me.

b) In absence of the Toronto Police and Mayor John Tory to seize documentation from Franco Alulio (CVZ0-82943), to order Alulio to provide information as to which authority he was acting under and why Respondent Roger Callow is the victim of a perverted driver license suspension form. That case should be heard first.

c) A court Order to the ON Legal Society to provide a detailed response to this Respondent and the Court vis a vis charges of fraud (for different reasons) against both B. a11d Dixon.

d) Any further materials supplied by Cavanagh LLP at this Hearing on February 11-2021.

6) Additional Information is available from the copious records of the Defendant on request by this court.

7) Reverse the indemnity request by the Plaintiff and award findings to this Respondent In like measure. What the Bobbsey Twins are doing is a replication of 2014 in which the usual legal tactic of 'the best form of Defense is Offense'; that is, do not respond in any meaningful fashion to a Plaintiff's Action deferring to a second Action launched by the Defendant in order to control the case as is happening here. If the court - including the ON Legal Society - had acted properly in 2014, we would not be in court today with one of the most egregious actions by a bureaucrat ever created In a democratic society. It is a typical example of what I label the effects of 'reverse osmosis'. The Ottawa courts seem incap.;1ble of curtailing this perniclou5

practice in this case; first introduced in 2014.

ACTION TO BE TAKEN BY THE U.S.

8) Until Deputy Minister, Christia Freeland takes concrete action in the above matter, the U.S. should handle all legal matters - both diplomatic and commercial - In U.S. courts.

ACTION TO BE TAKEN BY THE PUBLIC AT LARGE

9) To add this PLACARD to your street protest in N. America (but please, no violence to people)

JUSTICE FOR CANADIAN, ROGER CALLOW

Yours truly, Roger Callow Respondent

January 15-2021

TO the presiding Ottawa Court Justice hearing the below case on Feb. 11-2021 (sealed envelope to court filed with this account. cc Cavanagh LLP by mail

COURT OPTION:

To either dispense with the claim below as being 'without merit' and award me similar 'significant costs' parallel to which the Appellant would request

respond in detail to the myriad questions related to fraud as seen through many institutions on a written basis. Without that level of court investigation, claims related to the original lay off in B.C., the ON version commencing with the Ford ascension to the gov't.(CV18000 76950), the Franco Alulio action I laid to which he never responded (CV20-82943) nor has the Ottawa Court seen fit to give me a Hearing Date; Justice Rosalind Conway Hearing Feb.27-2020 (19- SC-155235) where she failed to deal with the issues, leading for my call for her recusal, no reports on the alleged fraud for separate reasons for the two lawyers named in the current action from the ON Legal Society; nothing can proceed without this court being labeled just · another 'whitewash job'. The Canadian Justice Ministry and the gov't. of democratic Canada would be no more leaving us at the mercy of U.S. Marines. I must be in attendance by telephone as COVID-19 concerns and my age (79) leave me highly vulnerable to infection. (I have never found the Ottawa law courts to be all that sanitary in any event.) Two earlier

factums have been supplied to the Court for this purpose and this marks the third such entry. (SEE website: rogercallow.com CV20-849830 for all three factums of this Respondent.)

Yours truly, (signed) Roger Callow January 15-2021.

On Dec.08-2020, as Respondent, I wrote on CV20-849830:

IN CONCLUSION, It is a major critique that such a nation as Canada has to go begging for justice to a foreign nation. The 35 year unresolved employeescasecanada.ca has reflected the fact that Canada does not have a Justice System; rather, merely a Legal System under the aegis

of corrupt and corruptible judges and chief justices. This case did not create this debacle; it merely reflects what has been going on for decades in Canada but recently, has taken a turn for the worst. As matters stand, no Canadian can trust to a Canadian court of law. In brief, President Biden, Canada needs your help.

TO: U.S. Embassy (Ottawa) by fax: JANUARY 27-2021 613-241-7845 ! pge.

FROM: Roger Callow self-represented Respondent CV20-849830 (Feb.11-2021 hearing date)

rcal/ow770@gmai/,com

REFERENCE: ADDENDUM to ORAL ARGUMl:NT dated DEC.08-2020 by the Respondent SEE employeescasecanada.ca 2020 LEGAL MAIL this date.

cc Andrew Coyne (Globe& Mail) Mark Bonokoski / Tarek Fatah (Ottawa Sun) Kelly Egan (Ottawa Citizen) Ellie Tesher (The Star) J. lvison / C. Selby (National Post)CAVANAGH MESSAGE;

1) I am sure that President Biden has concerns other than the direct interests of Roger Callow on Feb. 11·2021 where the future state of Canada is to be defined in <1n Ottawa courtroom. 2)I am equally sure indirectly that President Biden is concerned with matters relating to a 'clear and present danger' to U.S. interests as a consequence of this legal matter. I speak here

of the Franco Alulio algorithm of which the U.S. Embassy (Ottawa) has been kept fully apprised under two Presidents.

3) This algorithm is central to the legal interests of Roger Callow as well as to the legal interests indirectly for every N. American motorist for we live in a car culture.

4) My repeated request here is that President Biden publicize this issue to U.S. diplomatic and commercial interests as it affects dealings with Canadian courts of law.

5)

/!tJc

Should President Biden choose to ignore this request, perhaps the new Patriot Party being organized in Palm Beach will oblige,

Yours truly, (Roger Callow)

REFERENCE: CV20-849830 Bissonnette v. Callow H.D, February 11-2021 MESSAGE:

1) As the Respondent concerned whom wishes to attend the above hearing by teleconferencing, I request that you make the necessary arrangements.

2) Normally, the Registry in conjunction with the presiding Justice confirms teleconferencing the previous day by telephone.

3) Considering the anomalies being experienced in this case, I submit that if I do not hear from the Registrar on Wednesday, Feb. 10, I will conclude that no teleconferencing arrangements were made.

4) My biggest concern is that no hearing will be held on Feb. 11~2021 with the court Issuing a private Decision to the Plaintiff about which I will not be informed. Such action would give the two lawyers the necessary relief they request to be exonerated on separate charges of fraud while leaving the Franco Alulio algorithm intact with the courts refusing to entertain previously laid actions by this writer; all pointing to Alulio's inopportune driver license scam which is anathema to all North American drivers. It is a repeat of Ottawa court action in 2014 on this legal matter with the addition of the algorithm mentioned above.

/(/,JC,

Yours truly, Roger Callow Respondent

C) FEB. 11-2021 OUTCOMES:

CV20-849830 Ottawa Court House (2 hrs.)

Bissionnette (esq) Appellant v. Roger Callow Respondent

MESSAGE:

1) This story on the media has already been told favouring, as it does, the big Employer, and no matter what they do, their boycott of this national issue for the minority (me) for many years puts to rest any credibility that the media might have, TWO VERSIONS (sub-heading) both written by me - one purporting to be the media position and the second a rebuttal to the first account puts in sharp relief the two sides so that the public can see this disparity. For other reasons, the media is disappearing in any event as only talk-show radio appears to have much of a future.

2) For similar reasons, the politicians of Canada have disappeared as a force as the public have gone from a positive to a negative perception of them inside of one year. COVID is exposing that disjunct not only in Canada but throughout the world. Putin's warning at Davros 'all against all' is a prescient observation in that regard. The silence of Canada's politicians on the Employee's Case, particularly the Franco Alulio algorithm right out of Nazi Germany, can now metastasize with the addition of medical treatment centres (Auschwitz) due to political Inaction.

3) The courts of law repeatedly lie (as CBC's senior correspondent, Neil MacDonald has asserted recently. SEE rogercal/ow.com MEDIA feb. for excerpts.) I have always maintained that the 35 year Employee's Case did not create the malfeasance and misfeasance of the courts; it has merely exposed long term corruption marked primarily by the failure of oversight bodies to check on charges against judges. No Cdn. judge has ever been sent to jail. In the words of city guru, Jane Jacobs, a country goes rotten when its infrastructure fails.

Canada's infrastructure has failed. I call it Institutional Autism where Institutions speak only to other institutions with the individual left out. So what the gullible call 'law and order' is actually 'lawlessness and disorder by the officials '. Ancient Rome fell on those terms.

4) So, Mrs. Lincoln, you might just as well skip the Play and stay home planning your husband's funeral. With that analogy, there are 3 possible outcomes for FEB. 11-2021;

a) Granting the young 'Bobbsey Twin Lawyers' whom I have accused of fraud to the ON Legal Society (which does not respond to its legal mail) exoneration from my claims with 'substantial fees' to be applied. It goes without saying that the Franco Alulio algorithm where a target is barred from having legal counsel for any legal matter is ghosted with this '20-20 hindsight manoeuvre'; a devastating indictment in which all drivers in North America are condemned accordingly. A bigger crime is being condoned with this option; namely, the privilege of some legal counsel to approach the judges privately before a hearing- 'In the halls of Justice, all justice is in the halls'. Further with this option, the two young lawyers which I have charged separately with fraud get to keep their legal licenses.(The strongest Union in Canada is the legal fraternity. They know how to take care of their own.)

b) To avold any controversy, the court could refuse to hear the case on the grounds that the Plaintiffs 'have not made a case'. That would have to be done at the outset before any argument is taken based on the written evidence before the court. That alternative leaves the govt'. with a 'dirty biscuit' much like the Ford gov't inherited this 'dirty biscuit' with a docket number assigned on the last day of the preceding Liberals being in Office.

c) This option is more interesting but just as fallacious. The court will call for my written rebuttal which the Registry is blocking through spurious rneans. Further they will call for the

Franco Allulio response as to why he invoked this charge in the first place in a perverted manner by changing the suspension forms in the fashion that he did, Other disclosure may be called for. It will be done in such legal fashion that the Plaintiff can appeal the Decision to a 3- person Appeal Court which is, of course, Is a matter of 'issue oblivion' by these political Appeal Courts. In brief, the court will be seen to observe the principle of disclosure without actually fulfilling the task. To be sure, a desperate media will latch onto this alternative in the short range. After all, this trial is essentially about the demise of the Cdn. media as seen through the failure of the gov't. institutions outlined above.

5) As Respondent, I have prohibited the Feb. 11 Court from proceeding witho1,1t teleconferencing privileges for me. The Ottawa Court Registry has been appealed to on that basis. The proceedings should last about 5 minutes as I seek time to study disclosure documents of the Plaintiff,

6) So, dear reader, similar to Mrs. Lincoln, you might just as well skip the Play on Feb.11-2021 and stay home planning the funeral for the nation of Canada.

QLJc.,

Respectfully submitted, Roger Callow 'The last of the good guys' Now you know why I don't vote any longer

FEBRUARY 11-2021 CHRYSTIA FREELAND - part II

TO: Chrystia Freeland - Deputy P.M. FROM: Roger Callow Plaintiff in many legal cases

by fax: 613-996-9607 PAGES 1 rogercallow.com (Sub-heading) FEB 11 THE CONCLUSION (includes 3pge. Justice Roger comments from 'Feb. 11' to Freeland only CV20-849830)

QUOTE: When the institutions of a society deteriorate, a society dies. 'city guru' Jane Jacobs

MESSAGE:

1) This account is in addition to the letter of January 06 (rogercallow.com CHRYSTIA FREELAND Sub heading) showing that Deputy Minister, Chrystia Freeland, Canada's foremost politician and possibly next P.M. is 'a part of the problem' regarding Canada's past and future well-being as opposed to the solution. Through her in the microcosm is seen the condemnation of all politicians in the macrocosm who evade central issues such as the one labeled the Employee's Case; the 35 year unresolved labour matter where no compensation has been paid.

2) 'FEB. 11' in an Ottawa Court Case held by bastardized vertical procedures is reflective of why I have called for a Trusteeship over this despicable Court which, in actuality, is symbolic of the decay focused in Canada through your personage for all politicians. The actual case has no merit as it is a repeat of the failed ON stunt pulled in 2014 by the West Vancouver School Board in 1985 which set the precedent that a powerful Employer may escape paying compensation to dismissed employees complete with recall rights bitched by over 50 judges in all provinces-except NL- in Canada, through their illicit connections. (Actually, I was 'laid off' under the imposed BILL 35 (B.C. 1985) the only teacher so affected before the Bill was withdrawn with this case still before the courts= Banana Republic Justice. Hence I am still an employee of the Board, albeit an unpaid one=

$20 million settlement fee) Here's what the North Shore News had to say:

Get This Straight(c. 1986)

'...The teacher who was dumped was Roger Callow, and his dismissal (whatever happened to 'lay-off with recall rights'?) will go into the history books along with other great happenings like the invention of the steam engine and the telephone.' (you may yet be right here, Doug)' ...Can you remember any other teacher being shown the door for incompetence? ...The revolutionary heave-ho of which I speak became possible because the Socreds have brought in BILL 35 (dead on, Doug)...As far as Mr. Callow is concemed, I cannot say whether he is in fact incompetent...(Why not? You did everywhere else in your diatribe)...Enter Mrs. Margot Fmk, the schoolboard woman from West Vancouver who looks meek, but isn't...(she looks about as meek as Attila the Hun...and to think Dougy was also criticized for being anti female) She was one of the leading lobbyists for

t,,,...

BILL 35 (Don't.forget the role of John Reynolds, local A1PP now the federnl justice critic.for the Refimn Party for Christ's sake!) and voted for Callow's removal...'How was it possible, I asked her, that a man who had been employed for I 7 years could be incompetent?' "Because in the past no one had the guts to do anything about him," she added smartly...UP THE REVOLUTION' (I'll hJ1, Doug, I'll but it seems the revolution has already hoisted you on your own petard and Ji-om the sounds of your squealing, you don't like walking the proverbial mile in my boots...Oh, well, I think those boots are far too big.for you anyway...so, Doug...e11joy, enjoy the revolutionw,, heave ho....

In brief, I was the target of a set-up which ultimately led to the demise of the credibility of the Cdn. Justice System with related institutions and hence the loss of Canada as a nation. I call it

Institutional Autism where institutions speak only to other institutions thus making a mockery of our Charter of Rights and Freedoms for individuals.

THE FUTURE

3) There isn't any, particularly for those people who still believe in the vote. For those who question voting in Canada under these circumstances, one option, which applies to the U.S. as well, is to consider the 14th Colony protocol in which the U.S. permits Canada to join as a U.S. state. In brief, the obsolete BNA Act of 1867 plus precedent law is too unwieldy for Canada to function smoothly any longer. By becoming a U.S. state, Canadians get to revise their gov't. in terms of a Governor and his Council. Miscreant judges, for example, do not go to jail in Canada where the Legal Fraternity is the strongest Union which 'protects its own'.They do in the U.S.

The U.S. has a different perspective on this Protocol; namely, Canada is its northern military flank. Even the Netherlands has a bigger Navy than Canada.

4) The one thing in which both the U.S. and Canada have a vital common interest lies in the Franco Alulio algorithm whereby this Ontario bureaucrat, for reasons best known to himself, perverted the driver license suspension forms in such fashion that this target was robbed of any access to a lawyer for any legal purpose. All drivers in N. America are vulnerable to this Nazi-like scheme which could easily become an Organized Crime 'cottage industry' in both countries. To that extent, Chrystia Freeland's silence on this paramount issue is a personal indictment of everything she stands for. I call for all protesters across North America to add this Placard to their street demonstrations as a consequence: JUSTICE FOR ROGER CALLOW

5) Then what was the purpose of 'FEB. 11' other than the legal issues involved? The media. No democratic nation can exist without a viable media. By ghosting the national issue of the Employees Case, the Cdn. Media has shot their credibility down the crapper forever. CBC and Postmedia now depend on gov't hand-outs in a losing bid to stay afloat. There will be no tears from me when they go to their ultimate destination although I will miss the comic strips. FEB. 1I came and went with the media holding tight to the bitter end which is now and forever. It no longer matters what they say or do on this issue or any other major issue.

Respectfully submitted, Roger Callow 'Amom de Cosmos' former Canadian citizen whose appeal now will be to as yet an un-named Governor General (the last one was a disaster on this issue; see website: emploveescasecanada.ca 2016)

cc The GANG OF 8 media representatives for all Cdn. media: Andrew Coyne (Globe& Mail) Mark Bonokoski / Tarek Fatah (Ottawa Sun) Kelly Egan (Ottawa Citizen) Ellie Tesher (The Star) J, Ivison / C, Selby (National Post) L.Gunter (SUN - national edition)

cc The U.S. Embassy (Ottawa) / U.S. Professor VDH Hanson, particularly on Alulio algorithm

cc Justice Pierre Rogers Hearing judge for CV20-849830 / Cavanagh LLP

Justice Pierre Roger, the hearing judge for CV20-849830 is a senior judge in the Ottawa Courts appointed by Peter MacKay in 2015. He was formerly associated with Borden, Ladner, Gervais in Ottawa. His alma mater, Ottawa U. isn't exactly the cadillac of law schools but he has enough experience to spot a scam such as this one in which the conspirators under a blanket ban would seek to ghost such as the Franco Alulio Algorithm which I submit is the main goal here. It is a highly duplicitous action considering that other actions such as the one pending in N.B. naming the B.C. legal outfit for the Employer, Harris & Co. and two SK judges on fraud charges would, presumably, be included under this blanket ban as well as including the highly illicit actions of 4 Ontario judges dating back to 2014 which remain unexamined. In 2014, the court rejected Employer overtones on this level probably for these reasons.

The correct response for Rogers is to dispense with this case for being overly broad under the banner 'the case lacks merit' which would put an end to all the Employee's Case challenges considering my Dec. 31-2021 volunteer action to drop any further quest for compensation as I am not going to get it. The only reason that I participate in Feb. I I is that I am the Respondent

Depending on Roger's action which, should it go ahead, I have invited him to ask written questions of both sides in a case to be handled on a 'written party by party basis'. Should he give the Applicants what they want without question, I will not refer Rogers j. to the oversight bodies or to a 'political' Appeal Court; rather, I will challenge him to the new Governor General requesting that he be relieved of all activities related to the Canadian Justice System. The Franco Alulio algorithm is too dangerous to be sloughed off this way.

As to Dixon asking this Applicant to sit on a phone line for 5 hours plus while he sits around the courts; that is not on my program. A few years back in Gatineau, I sat around a court along with other dunderhead lawyers for this is where the big outfits send them on minor cases hoping to charge later on a 'win'. The dunderheads are as happy as clams as well knowing the judges are in on this scam. That is why Dixon, if he was serious about this case, would have changed his ZOOM application to one of telephone conferencing where the court, when ready, telephone the litigants who are able to go on with other things while waiting. Unfo1tunately here, stupidity was heaped on stupidity; that is Court nonsense heaped on lawyer nonsense has scuttled today's hearing as any Decision is compromised should the court proceed today. If the matter is not to be dropped, as I recommend, then rebuild the case properly. Rogers j., in summary, should not throw good actions onto a suspect foundation thus drawing into question any judicial conclusion he might draw.

Respectfully submitted Roger Callow FEB.11-2021

FEB.11 9 A.M. TO: Cavanagh LLP from Roger Callow Feb. 11-2021 Feb. 11 4 A.M. CV20-849830 10 A.M. hearing time

1) Thank-you for your reply dated last night 21:26

2) The key difference between a ZOOM call and teleconferencing is that the Court in league with the sitting judge must agree to this routine. Hence it is not merely a technical difference. The Ottawa Court Registry was notified by me in plenty of time to act but did not hence providing a response to the Registry is superfluous.

3) I will, as earlier stated to you, be available between I 0-10:30 for the court to telephone me. I will not contact them under the above noted circumstances.

4) Nor will I contact you in that time period.

5) You may wish to reconsider and drop your case considering that I am not pursuing any aspect of the Employee's Case involving either you or Bissionnette. Of course you have the option of requesting a postponement considering how the courts screwed up here. Further, Justice C. MacLeod has shown that he can fix any problem which ails you such as merely dropping any cases without a hearing as he has already done in this case vis a vis the Ottawa General Hospital.

6) In the event you insist on pursuing this matter, the topic of fraud remains paramount. Disclosure from the ON Legal Society Report on alleged fraud against both of you made by me for separate reasons becomes paramount.

ADDENDUM: As I did not hear from Cavanagh LLP to the above by 9 A.M. to get this matter on track for today, I am requesting through their offices, considering that the Registry does not provide similar services to me, to enter a 'stay of proceedings' on my behalf until a future date is named by the court. As matters stand, any Decision reached by the court today would be null and void until such time that the court is restructured properly as defined above. Consequently, I will not be available by telephone today. 10 A.M. Dixon never replied to this e-mail 10:20 A.M. Dixon is 'damning the torpedoes' and proceeding, shall I say, regardless. '

4 P.M. 3 page Decision from Justice Pierre Roger which refuses to recognize any other vertical dimension other than ZOOM which I do not have and the court was unwilling to contact me on any level

= request for the recusal of Justice Roger through arrangements made by Deputy Minister C. Freeland.

(that is, until a new Gov. Gen. is appointed) P.S. Note 3):1 was here and there was no phone call from the court at 11:45 A.M. I find Justice Roger to be prejudiced against my interests as outlined in 3). I cannot trust to this Registry on any level. Either the Registry is misleading the Justice or the Justice is misleading me. Would the newly assigned justice please accept teleconferencing. Immediate attention required as April 8,2021 is the new H.D. To repeat, my interest does not lie with pursuing these two lawyers. It does lie in the court not ghosting such as the Franco Alulio algorithm.

FORM 23A

Courts of Justice Act

NOTICE OF DISCONTINUANCE

ROGER CALLOW AND ALEXANDRE BISSIONNETTE CV20-84943 (FEB. 23, 2021)

FEBRUARY 23-2020 (file: rogerca/low.com MEDIA mar)

TO: Interim GG SCofC Chief Justice Richard Wagner/ Rideau Hall/ 1 Sussex Dr. Ott.K1A 0A1

(Sent by letter mail) 1: pages (also mailed to Ottawa Court Registry)

FROM: Roger Callow Plaintiff 1285 Cahill Dr. #2001 Ottawa K1V 9A7 t: 613-521-1739 websites: employeescasecanada.ca to 2020. rogercal/ow.com from 2021 onward

REFERENCE: CV20-849830 Bissonnette esq. v Callow H.,o. April 08-2021

cc DEPUTY MINISTER CHRYSTIA FREELAND & U.S. EMBASSY (OTTAWA), by fax

MESSAGE:

1) On FEB.22-2021, I received by e-mail (rcallow770@gmail.com) the following message from an Ottawa Court Registry factotum:

Ottawa SCJ Courts (MAG) Mon, 22 Feb, 14:24

Hello Roger,

So you are aware, we do not send corre,pondence to judges unless the j.idge has expressly advisect Lis to do so.

As for your email; I'm not sure what you are referring to when you say "Incorrect File Number", 20-84983 is correct. In regards to your comments for the event that you did not attend, the parties are to call into the event. We generally do not attempt to call the parties, in this case however a call was attempted as Indicated in the endorsement.

So you ,:ire aware the justice is able to decide on how the matter will proceed. You will need to attend the' scheduled zoom event and bring this up if you have concerns. A for providing you the details to connect to the event, I have added your email "Roger Callow rcallow770@gm:,il.cotYI" and updated my internal partners to ensure that you receive the information. Generally this information is provided the day prior to the event. Thank you, (unsigned RC)

2) Response regarding above to GG/Chrystia Freeland:

a) While hospitals may use a first name to rouse a comatose patient; the situation is not parallel-in a court of law i.e. when the court asks me to identify myself before proceeding, I am not merely 'Roger' as my full name must be used. The Plaintiff in this matter 'l<ris' of Cavanagh LLP has the same problem not recognizing that the 'woke generation' has not taken over...yet.

b) The correct designation of this filed motion by Cavanagh originally last November is CV20- 849830 not CV20"84983 as Bacque would assert Changing one letter on a password can confound any transmission hence I refuse to recognize any further conduct of this case until proper legal corrections are made. Both the GG and Freeland are notified in order to oversee this correction process, No Court transmissions were received by me on Feb. 10 or Feb. 11.

c) Technical glitches on the Feb. 11 vertical hearing could very well be the source of Pierre Roger j's misguided directions although those directions were perverted to such an extent compromising my side of the case that I found it necessary to request his recusal as of Mar.15

d) There was 'no previous day warning' from the court as to this hearing which makes no recognition of my request to be heard bv teleconferencing which is NOT the same as ZOOM as a judge must be made aware of the request and approve accordingly.

e) The above information was included in material (Reply 25A) material to Justice Roger but the Registry hamstrung the normal procedures through picayune regulations. I have been dealing for many years, including the Ottawa courts in 2014, without this kind of nonsense.

f) While Cavanagh LLP has supplied some written materials gratuitously on my behalf, I still request direct written cont<1ct with the sitting judge cc Cavanagh LLP on this matter. Hell, if both these lawyers are able to make private representations to judges as detailed to the ON Legal Society (which doesn't respond to its legal news); why can't I through a legal process?

3) Included with this letter is <1 cancellation of CV20·84943 I made against Alexander Biss. esq called to the bar In 2017 (and already having private side-bars with A.G. Deputy Justice Rosalind Conway (bench appt. 2018. These A.G. appointments are particularly troublesome in this case) on Feb. 27 in SDC 19-SC-155235 (illicit mandamus/agreement settlement court where I called for her recusal for failing to deal with the issues). There is some question as to whether the Ottawa Registry filed CV20-84943. Nonetheless, I am sending in a Form 23A Notice of discontinuance with this account. As there was never any response from Bissionnette; no expense was incurred by him. However, if a legal fee is attached to any action which he launches such as the above CV20•849830; then he should expect a similar charge in the same amount. In brief, there is no realistic reason for Cavanagh LLP to proceed any further

4) The alleged conspiracy in this current CV20-849830 was conceived, it is asserted here, before I abandoned all hope on December 31, 2020 of getting redress for my 35 year senior teacher lay-off for economic reasons due to judicial malfeasance of over 50 judges across Canada, I om only present currently as I .irn named as a frivolous and vexatious Respondent who has had my case usurped by this Plaintiff aping a similar pattern in 2014 in Ontario (SEE website). My written offer to Roger j. to dismiss is still valid until March 15-2021.

5) The allegation here is that Roger j. will insert a 'Trojan Horse' into my affairs beyond the

Employee's Case which I have abandoned as noted above. That deprivation could be linked to the existence of my website aping the U.S. Patriot Act closing down so-called terrorist websites. That action, if it materializes, would be the biggest criminal action in Canada as there is no parallel to a Patriot Act. Columnist Lorne Gunter has raised the question as far as the government through BILL C-10 performing such an 'internet' action for Parliament. A similar carte blanche action by Roger j. could achieve the same result for the judges.

6) A copy of this Jetter is being sent to the Ottawa Registry by mail to be forwarded to Roger j.

as well as Cavanagh LLP for forwarding purposes to him.

7) The earlier request to the GG to represent me under 'we the people' still stands.

;:;; C/Y}f

Yours truly, Roger Callow February 23-2021

also cc L.Gunter / U.S. Professor V. Hanson (& Ottawa Sun columnist)

MAR 15-2021:THERE HAS BEEN NO RESPONSE FROM ANY SOURCE TO THE FOLLOWING. RC

FEBRUARY 23-2021 (file: rogerca/low.com MEDIA mar)

TO: Interim GG SCofC Chief Justice Richard Wagner/ Rideau Hall/ 1 Sussex Dr. Ott.KIA 0A1

(Sent by letter mail) .i. pages (also mailed to Ottawa Court Registry)

FROM; Roger Callow Plaintiff 1285 Cahill Dr, #2001 Ottawa KlV 9A7 t; 613-521-1739 websites: emp/oyeescasecanada.ca to 2020. rogercallow,com from 2021 onward REFERENCE: CV20•849830 Bissonnette esq. v Callow H.D. April 08-2021

cc DEPUTY MINISTER CHRYSTIA FREELAND & U.S. EMBASSY (OTTAWA). by fax

MESSAGE:

1) On FEB.22-2021, I received by e-mail (rcallow770@gmail.com) the following message from

an Ottawa Court Registry factotum:

Ottawa SCJ Courts (MAG) Mon, 22 Feb, 14:24

Hello Roger,

So you are aware, we do not send correspondence to judge, unle, thejudge has expressly advised us to do so.

As for your email; I'm not sure whst yo1,1 are referring to when you say "Incorrect File Number", 20-84983 is

correct. In regards to your comments for the event that you did not attend, the parties are to call into the event. We generally do not attempt to call the p<1rt ie 51 in this c $e however a call was attempted as indicated in the endorsement.

So you are aware the justice is able to decide on how the matter will proceed. You will need to attend the

scheduled Zoom event and bring this up if you have concerns. As for providing you the details to connect to the eve'nt, I have added your email "Roger Callow rcallow770@gmail.corn" and updated niy iliternal partners to i,nsure that you receive the information, Gener lly this information is provided the day prior to the evenL

Thank you, (unsigned RC)

2) Response regarding above to GG/Chrystia Freeland:

a) While hospitals may use a first name to rouse a comatose patient; the situation is not parallel in a court of law i.e. when the court asks me to identify myself before proceeding, I am not merely 'Roger' as my full name must be used. The Plaintiff in this matter 'Kris' of Cavanagh LLP has the same problem not recognizing that the 'woke generation' has not taken over...yet.

b) The correct designation of this filed motion by Cavanagh originally last November is CV20-

849830 not CVi0-84983 as Bacque would assert. Changing one letter on a password can confound any transmission hence I refuse to recognize any further conduct of this case until proper legal corrections are made. Both the GG and Freeland are notified in order to oversee this correction process. No Court transmissions were received by me on Feb. 10 or Feb. 11.

d) There was 'no previous day warning' from the court as to this hearing which makes no recognition of my request to be heard by teleconferencing which is NOT the same as ZOOM as a judge must be made aware of the request and approve accordingly.

f) While Cavanagh LLP has supplied some written materials gratuitously on my behalf, I still request direct written contact with the sitting judge cc Cavanagh LLP on this matter. Hell, if both these lawyers are able to make private representations to judges as detailed to the ON Legal Society (which doesn't respond to its legal news); why can't I through a legal process?

3) Included with this letter is a cancellation of CV20-84943 I made against Alexander Biss. esq called to the bar in 2017 (and already having private side-bars with A.G. Deputy Justice Rosalind Conway (bench appt. 2018. These A.G. appointments are particularly troublesome in

this case) on Feb. 27 in SDC 19-SC-155235 (illicit mandamus/agreement settlement court where I called for her recusal for failing to deal with the issues). There is some question as to whether the Ottawa Registry filed CV20-84943, Nonetheless, I am sending in a Form. 23A

Notice of discontinuance with this account. As there was never any response from Bissionnette; no expense was incurred by him. However, if a legal fee is attached to any action which he launches such as the above CV:Z0-849830; then he should expect a similar charge in the same amount. In brief, there is no realistic reason for Cavanagh LLP to proceed any further

· who has had my case usurped by this Plaintiff aping a similar pattern in 2014 in Ontario {SEE website). My written offer to Roger j. to dismiss is still valid until March 15-2021.

5) The allegation here is that Roger j. will insert a 'Trojan Horse' into my affairs beyond the Employee's Case which I have abandoned as noted above. That deprivation could be linked to the existence of my website aping the U.S. Patriot Act closing down so-called terrorist websites. That action, if it materializes, would be the biggest criminal action in Canada as there is no parallel to a Patriot Act. Columnist Lorne Gunter has raised the question as far as the government through BILL C·10 performing such an 'internet' action for Parliament. A similar carte blanche action by Roger j. could achieve the same result for the judges.

6) A copy of this letter is being sent to the Ottawa Registry by mail to be forwarded to Roger j.

as well as Cavanagh LLP for forwarding purposes to him,

7) The earlier request to the GG to represent me under 'we the people' still stands.

Yours truly, Roger Callow February 23-2021

also cc l.,Gunter / U.S. Professor V. Hanson (& Ottawa Sun columnist)

MARCH 15-2021: TO-CAVANAGH l.LP TO PRESENT TO THE COURT (APRIL 08)

cc?GOVERNOR GENERAL of CANADA- (N.B. NO NEW APPT. MADE: WAGNER UNACCEPTABLE)

MARCH 16-2021 NEWSLETTER _(MEDIA _mar) _;!page

POST IN STAFFROOM-hit radio talk shows QUOTES: THE PRESIDENT IS MISSING Bill Clinton {former U.S. Pres./James Patterson)

1) ' ...that peaceful protest is one of the mast admirable forms of patriotism.'

2) 'Surrounding yourself with sycophants and bootlickers is the surest rout,; to failure.'

BACKGROUND: (see NEWSLITTERS: March 01,15, 16-2021 (MEDIA mar) plus APRIL 08 Sub-heading

BY: Roger Callow rogercol/ow.com {2021) 'KING OF THE WHISTLEBLOWERS' ...Time to end this 35 year unresolved Judicial farce, the emptoyeescasecanado.ca which I did on DEC. 31-2020. rile Employer won, I didn't nor did 38 million Canadians when they lost Justice Canada due to systemic malfeasance" dt'lstruction of democratic Canada in its totallty...The only answer is what one sees around the world...hit the streets but please, no violence to people. It is a waste of time voting under these circumstances in Canada.

THE THREAT (SEE Mar. 01 Newsletter for complete details)

It's the algorithm, stupid, not the people... Canadians are so caught up with the conspiracy against Roger Callow, that they do not perceive thl'l rnal threat; namely, the algorithm which Franco Alulio, Deputy

Minister of Transport-Medical in Ontario set up by which a targeted Individual such as myself can be

deprived of ;ll!_legal representation for any matter due to his bogus driver license suspension failure of

the media to expose the Franco Alulio story rank, right Lip there with the b/gge,t abLJse in Canadian society on

a par with what happened in Nazi G11rmany 1s 'Final Solution'. A. Eichmann; move over.

THE PRESENT (#2-4 from Mar. 01 Newsletter)

...2) Until the question of my 'existence' is remedied by the Supreme Court of Canada (Under Section 140, they can hear anything of a national concern and my suit against Alullo CV20-82943 hits right at the core of thi, miscarriage of justice under Ottawa Justice Pierre Roger whose recusal I have called for. He would seek to eradicate previous matters under 'all issUl'lS' (CV20-82943) without defining any one issue in CV20"849830 on

Apr.8-2021 where I am accused of being afrivo/ou, & vexatiot1s Respondent.

3) Hence being between the Devil and the deep blue sea in the interim, I must rely on the Office of the

Governor General acting under 'we the people' to attend any hearings above 'as a friend of Roger Callow'.

4) Without Individual social media support from those reading this NEWSLETTER, little else can be done.

APRIL 08-2014 Oral Argument (2 pages defined under March 15 NICWSLETTER)

March 16 - PARTY POLITICS While the notion of Party Politics is not mentioned in the BNA Act; it is the essence of our gov't operation. Under this banner {SEE MEDIA mar), I challenged 3 Opposition leaders which did not respond completing the fall of Canada as a nation: FED: a) Tory O'Toole b)NDP Singh PROV. ON Prov. Horwath (NOP) latter denies any correspondence which is typical of NDP. O'Toole is not responding either.

Yours truly, Roger Callow Respondent CV20-849830

SUN MEDIA columnists: Lorne Gunter & U.S. Professor V.D. Hanson /cc Deputy Mini ter C.Freeland

MARCH 15-2021 NEWSLETTER (MEDIA mar)

POST IN STAFFROOM-hit radio talk shows

BACKGROUND: (see NEWSLETTER March 01 preliminary)

BY: Roger Callow rogercal/ow.com (2021) 'KING OF THE WHISTLEBLOWERS' ...Time to end this 35 year unresolved Judicial farce, the employeescasecanada,ca which I did on DEC, 31-2020. The Employer won, I didn't nor did 38 million Canadians when they lost Justice Cahada due to systemic malfeasance= destruction of democratic Canada in Its totality. The last Act is slated in an ottawa courtroom on April 08 -2021.

cc Deputy P.M. Chrystia Freeland as the last Cam,dian authority left standing, to either act or get out of politics. As lrump did not see the threat to U.S. interests, perhaps Pres. Biden will.(cc U.S. Embassy-Ottawa)· cc SUN MEDIA's Lorne Gunter who fears gov't. control of internet through BILL C·10. CV20-849830 is the

current parallel device to seize internet control by the Cdn. Judges on April 08 where I am the Re pondent,

The only answer is what one sees around the world...hit the streets but please, no violence to pi;,ople. It is a waste of time voting under these circumstance in Canada: VOTERS; FOOLS VOTING FOR OTHER fOOLS THE THREAT (SEE Mar. 01 Newsletter for complete details)

It's the algorithm, stupid, not the people... Canadians are so caught up with the conspiracy against Roger Callow, that they do not perceive the real threat; namely, the algorithm which Franco Alulio, Deputy Minister of Transport-Medkal In Ontario set up by which a targeted individual such as myself can be

.deprived of Ml.legal representation for any matter due to his bogus driver license suspension. failure of

the media to expose the Frcmco Alulio story ranks right up there with the biggest abuse in Canadian society on a par with what happened in Nazi Germany's 'Final Solution'. A. Eichmann; move over.

THE PRESENT (#2·4 from Mar. 01Newsletter)

...2) Until the question of my 'existi;,nce' is remedied by the Supreme Court of Canada (Under Section 140, they can hear anything of a national concern and my suit against Alulio CV20-82943 hits right at the core of this miscarriage of justice under Ottawa Justice Pierre Roger whose recusal I have called for. He would seek to eradicate previous matters under 'all issues' without defining any one issue in CV20·849830 on Apr.8-2021 where I am accused of being a frivoloV'.i & vexatious Respondent.

3) Hence being between the Devil and the deep blue sea in the interim, I must rely on the Office of the

Governor General a ting under 'we the people' to attend any hearings above 'as a friend of Roger callow'.

4) Without individual social media support from those reading this NEWSLETTER, little else can be done.

APRIL 08-2014 Oral Argument

1) March 15 has come and gone without either the Applicants dropping their case considering that in February I dropped my case against them with Justice Roger given until March 15 to dispose of CV20·849830 without repercussions from me in an offer he failed to meet. Hence this Newsletter details all those arguments under the heading of 'all issues' which the Applicants request but do not detail. Following is a list of those issues which I ask to be dealt with in writing on a Party by Party basis to ensure that Roger j. stays on topic. A blanket rejection of the following issues, particularly the one related to Franco Alulio, would lead to a

request by me for Roger j's removal from the entire judiciary in Canada. My concern here is that a 'one-liner' will be used to ghost very serious accusations: e.g. The court rules that the Respondent is guilty in all matters before this court of being frivolous & vexatious and costs wiil follow to the Applicant. Further the Respondent is barred from any future court dealings related to the topic of his employment dispute. My presence in such a court would be

redundant to say the least.

1) I submit that the key to Roger j. ls to eliminate all action by Roger Callow beyond the immediate appeal by the two lawyers against which I have made written accusations offraud to the ON Legal Society. These two young lawyers from small legal outfits did not respond but their objection is made redundant in that in February, I withdrew the charge. Should Roger j. include any mention of this charge in his Decision; I would expect him to call for details on this issue from me or the ON Legal Society, Copious materials abound.

2) Other central issues which could lead to an Appeal even though I have no faith in Ottawa Court Appeals dating from 2014, are:

a) The court must not accept this case due to it being improperly re-arranged by the Ottawa Court. The filed number is CV20-849830 not CV20-84983. I have Invited the Applicant to refile under an e11tirely new number if they are so intent on getting a Decision. There was no response.

b) I await a Decision of the new Governor General which is being kept aware of legal problems

here as is Deputy Minister Chrystia Freeland. Until my identity as a native born Canadian is established due to the reprehensible Franco Alullo algorithm, I ask that the GG attend the April 08 hearing as 'a friend of Roger Callow' His authority to act Is under 'we the people', The GG

would request the court to provide questions to be answered by both the Applicant and this Respondent on outstanding issues. Frivolous and vexatious considerations would not be

entertained at this time. I believe I can function under written answers apart from court hearings.

c) As to the original teacher lay-off in B.C, in June of 1985 under the imposed BILL 35 of which

arbitration was quashed leaving me in limbo without any compensation for 35 yearsj Roger j. can order me back to work as I am still an employee of the West Vancouver School Board albeit an unpaid one or cause the Supreme Court of Canada (four such Appeals were neutered earlier at this level) under Section 140 to act under the heading of a national issue as this case

has been in almost every province plus the Federal Court. In short, 'no answer' cannot be a 'legal answer' to an unresolved legal n,atter. In colloquial terms; the judge may not pick up the legal ball and go home before a Decision is assigned; being frivolous and vexatious

notwithstanding.

d) The key to the fraudulency of the original lay-off lies in the minute notes of July 1985 in which legal Counsel Stuart Clyne, it is alleged here, fraudulently redesigned the vote. There are no limitations on fraud. Anything flowing from a fraud is 'null and void'. Again Roger j. is in a position to make those requests e.g. a judicial review in order to retain credibility in the Canadian Justice System on a major topic relating to employee compensation. As matters stand from this case precedent, a powerful Employer may escape his fiduciary obligations to dismissed employees including pension rights.

e) Mention of Deputy Justice Rosalind Carter in a Feb.27-2020 mandamus/agreement

settlement conference failed to deal with the issues tracing back to the Alulio suspension. I called for her recusal. In that informal hearing, I brought up the fact that lawyer Bissionnette (B,) against who I have the current action, ordered the police on a wellness check which 8. denied: 'I never did'. 'The police said you did and I believe the police,' I retorted.

Now that B. is under oath, the court is obliged to check out with the police on that point and, if shown to be the case, to charge him with public mischief.

f) The young lawyer representing B., Ken Dixon of Cavanagh LLP did something Sarkozy of

France was recently jailed three years for doing; namely, clandestinely visiting a judge, A.G. , Master Kaufmann, surreptitiously whom amazingly wrote a judgment for him during the COVID lockdown of March 2020. That unsanctioned action forms very much a part of my request for the Ottawa Court to be placed under a Trusteeship.

g) Master Kaufmann was also instrumental in dropping my Action against Justice C. Macleod of

the Ottawa Court who in turn dropped my $10 million action c1gainst the Ottawa General Hospital where I became their first political prisoner. No hearing was called by Macleod j. thereby changing the very fabric of Canadian Justice in a fundamental fashion. Cavanagh LLP would make reference in a general sense to all the above matters perverting them, I submit, to show advantage to themselves largely through the 'omission of fact'.

3) In conclusion, there are good grounds to submit that I have been the target of a massive

conspiracy involving an Employer with their legal Counsel, the Courts of Law, and the Politicians concerned. Hence if Roger j.'s actions parallel early Decisions from over 50 judges, this matter will go on for years, if not in the court, in the forum of publlc opinion. The Alulio algorithm, for example, negatively impacts all North American drivers. As I have voluntarily ended my involvement in the Employee's Case as of Dec.31-2020; it makes no logical sense to 'flog a dead horse'. As to outside settlement In order to obey the legal niceties, I have offered the Employer a settlement price which is 1/40th of the current $20 million cost of settlement. Keep in mind that a civil case is all about financial settlement.

Yours truly, Roger Callow Respondent CV20-849830 NOT CV20-84983 cc SUN MEDIA columnists: Lorne Gunter & U.S. Professor V.D. Hanson cc Deputy Minister Chrystia Freeland

NEWSLETTER

APRIL 01 (written March 17-2021} for Apr. 08 Hearing

1) Perhaps there are those who believe my MARCH 16 (SEE MARCH 2021) i11sert was done with some bravado considering that it was written a week previously. Not so as the conspirators' u11iverse unravels as it will...and I am there to catch them out at every step. 111 that process, it doesn't help me that the myopic media has boycotted the biggest challenge to

Canada and Canadian Society since its inception by limiting itself to looking through the big end of the telescope at every Issue solely in terms of its political slant. I call it political cowardice. All Canadians are poorer on this account.

2) First of all, whom do I mean by the conspirators behi11d CVZ0·849830 which the Ottawa Courts renamed CV20·84983 creating confusion::: 'Trusteeship' which Is no doubt part of the scam. The real conspirators, however, sit in the Justice Building on Wellington Street in Ottawa (reputed to be the most highly stressed building in Canada for good reason, but I digress) with such as Ottawa Court's Pierre Roger j. and the young 'Bobbsey Twin' lawyers • the latter charged with fraud for different reasons - merely being the messenger boys. Of course that connection disappears at the slightest hint of trouble leaving the messengers to take the flak.

3) The current conspiracy was set in October 2020 before it was known that I would put a voluntary end to the Employee's Case as of Dec.31-2020 for I was just butting my head against corrupt Judges and politicians. After 35 years, there was no longer any se11se to adding defiance to denial. Canada effectively ended its nationhood, however that be defined, but one thing is clear; the individual in our society has been deprived of due process under the laws. Added to this departure by rne was the dropping of the legal action against the two lawyers in Feb. 2021 making any hearing on that point moot which ostensibly, is what CV20•849830 is all about. Personally, I couldn't give a rat's ass about the Justice System 'protecting 011e of.its

ow11' which is the expected result; the ON Legal Society - which does not answer its legal mail - 11otwithstanding,

4) The real issue which the court would like to 'disappear' is the Franco Alulio Algorithm with me along with it (SEE websites; employeescasecanada.ca & rogercal/ow.com) which condemns all N. American drivers to the heinous action of a bureaucrat through a perverted driver

license suspension scam and in that process aping, as it does, the 'final solution' of NAZI Germany which is a 'clear and present danger' to all N. American drivers. I have detailed those concerns in March 2021NEWSLETTERS. The secondary issue is to drive me off the internet; a challenge paralleling BILL ClO in which the Feds would like to seize Internet control from Google. This case would parallel those results for the Judges. Hence I am insistent that any questions being raised in this court by Roger j. be done so in writing in order to thwart this political agenda. No doubt the court mistakenly believes that they can contain this algorithm to a single case. Considering that one is dealing with an algorithm; that is an impossibility.

Much easier to defend a double negative; another impossibility. As a side note, snail mail and fax communication are not subject to adulteration such as the internet is prone and has been my prime means of promulgating the Employee's Case. I leave the Social Media to others.

5) I have asked the Governor General under 'we, the people' to represent me in court as I

currently have no legal identity as one consequence of the Alulio algorithm.

6) While I was prepared to include the aberrant 'psychiatric' algorithm under the Dec.31-2020 declaration; I will not now as the case takes on a new dimension with a focus on the Medical Profession aka the Psychiatric extension. My experience here parallels a WS program pointing out how this megalithic organization will spend $100,000 to protect a Doctor against a $10,000 malpractice suit which abound in Canada. For the Medical oversight body, 90% of their costs are covered by the taxpayers...go figure.

7) But those charges were not done for medical malpractice in my case which led to a 9-day

lock-down in the secure wing of the Ottawa Hospital at Xmas 2019 making me their first 'political prisoner'; even after I passed all medical tests ordered by a fake court order (SEE internet for details), I sued both the Doctor, young family Dr. A. Jahagirdar of Southgate Family Medicine clinic, and the Ottawa General Hospital for $10 million each. As the Medical

Insurance could hardly hide that expenditure; enter Ottawa Court's Justice C. Macleod whom, on his own volition and without taking argument, quashed both actions as being 'frivolous and vexatious'; a favourite 'get out of jail free card' for judges in trouble. The course of Canadian Justice was changed at the 'stroke of a pen' by that action for now all powerful litigants will

merely 'buy the judge'. A.G.'s Master Kaufman used the same routine to drop the case which I subsequently laid against Macleod j. using the same cover story. Roger j. would like to sanction those actions; no doubt through a general amnesty for the perpetrators which is a farce. He is not the U.S. President.

8) Jf you google my name (Google sells their space), you will see the emphasis is placed on

favouring the big guy Employer. (While I publish biogs; the Employee's Case was never really an Internet matter; rather, a 'snail mail' matter which I began in the latter 80's -I was laid off for economic reasons under the Imposed BILL 35 (B.C. 1985) - followed up with a fax option which I use to the current day.) One such miscreant is Justice. C. McKinnon whose 2014 Decision paralleling this one where, once before, I was also the Respondent having my own case usurped when I was overwritten by this kind of stunt. One of the 3 Decisions he wrote ori

the same event appears on Google; the two other mutually exclusive Decisions do not (Would the real Colin McKinnon please stand up?). Even here, I have no way of knowing whether any of his Decisions was filed and if it was, was it later removed?...our courts are just that corrupt.. The Employer's lawyer, Hicks, Morley, et al departed the scene hurriedly without asking for a paycheck. Now a second like-minded stunt is scheduled for Apr. 08 2021.

9) The B.C. Teachers Union was wild in this 'sweetheart deal' when I changed lawyers in 1986

with the court quashing the arbitration ruling the arbitrator to be patently unreasonable. He had converted 16 new hires to read 16 lay-offs with the 17th to be me knowing full well. that there were no other lay-offs in June of 1985. No West Vancouver School Board member took the stand to testify (perjure themselves) as to lay-off numbers. Justice Southin in 1986 called for all materials regarding my lay-off but returned key documents illustrating fraud on the part of Stuart Clyne QC in holding a second secretive meeting In July where he 'restructured' the School Board vote. Southin should have charged him with fraud. She also tried to escape censure by returning those notes, with the Union confiscating my copy which they hold to this day refusing to provide me my rightful copy. Significance? If fraud is shown, everything flowing from it Is null and void. In this case, I would be returned to the job with all back pay plus interest (35 years worth). Currently, I am still an employee of the Board albeit an unpaid one. That is the crime of over SO judges who, in effect, ruled my claim for compensation under the

law to be frivolous and vexatious when in fact that label is more aptly applied to themselves.

Will Roger j. under discussing 'all issues' call for that disclosure; in essence calling over 50 judges liars? I think not. Much easier to sink the entire SS Titanic Judicial System than to call for a reckoning of the biggest scam for any democratic country. Our very institutions have been lost for all time as the torpedoes have been damned over and over again and still missed the target. For a mixed analogy, it is a little like taking a 852 stratofortress to bomb a mosquito...and missing. One does not get to refer to the continued existence of 'the Old Boy's Club' under those circumstances. That is why I have called for this PLACARD to be added to all street protests in N. America: JUSTICE FOR ROGER CALLOW ... that support is needed now.

10) Hence the new direction focused on in this trial is primarily on the disclosure of the fake

psychiatric evidence - or lack thereto - of ON Deputy Minister of Transport, Franco Alullo, whom I submit should be tried with the equivalent charge of treason.

11) One thing which I have to be on guard against in this civil issue is that Roger j. does not

seek a way to attach criminal proceedings against me to this civil issue.

12) As of March 17, as earlier offered, the following opportunities are rescinded: a}Roger j.

to drop case b) Bobbsey Twins to drop case c) WV School Board to settle for 1/40 of asking

$20 million.

Roger Callow Amour de Cosmos but not Cda - no thanks to Premier Ford & AG Doug Downey

cc SUN media columnists, L. Gunter & U.S. Professor, V. Hanson

P.S, No response from the Civil Liberties Union nor CAA (Northwest ON President)

SJC Assistants (Ottawa Court 5th Floor) March 16-2021. (Below is Callow response)

1) Above received by e-mail from SJC on March 16-2021 and shows an

abysmal lack of knowledge on this matter from Feb. 11-2021, the date of this information to the present. You may see that pertinent correspondence on my website rogercallow.cam MARCH 2021 MEDIA in which I call for the recusal of Roger j, if he did not drop CV20-849830 NOT CV20-84943 by today (Mar.16-2021)

Z) Cavanagh LLP had been asked to provide that material to the court as the court has bungled communication on my part. Apparently they didn't forward any information if this account is any example hence your Feb. 22 missive to me is 'marching to the tune of a different drummer'.

3) The central argument is that, as I have no legal identity as per the ramifications of the Franco Alulio algorithm false license suspension which negatively impacts any legal standing which I have, I must resort to the Office of the Governor G_eneral to represent me under 'we the people' on April 8 hence any arrangements to be made are to be with the GG. There is no other recourse. They have been informed of my request.

4) Three offers made to Roger j., Cavanagh LLP, and the west Vancouver School Board for an

outside settlement expire today. A three page analysis under APRIL OB rogercal/ow.com will appear tomorrow outlining the new course of events.

Yours truly, Roger Callow Respondent In a matter usurped by the Applicant to avoid providing a response to my action previously laid CV20-84943 against Bissonnette esq. (That stunt is a repeat of 2014 in which a judge acted fraudulently, See letter under April OB tomorrow.

March 24-2021

TO: l<ris Dixon (Associate #58019M (Ll)) of Cavanagh LLP by fax: 613-569-8668 ( pages) cc Deputy Minister C. Freeland by fax: 613-996-9607 with enclosures (2 pages ON gov't.)

From: Roger Callow Respondent in CV20-849830 H.D. Apr.08-2021 by vertical procedures

t: 613-521-1739 employeescasecanada,ca to Dec.31-2020 / rogercallow,com from Jan. 2021

ACTION REQUIRED

1) For Deputy Minister C. Freeland to call for a Royal Enquiry into all matters relating to the senior teacher lay-off in 1985 of Roger Callow for solely economic reasons under the auspices of the imposed BILL 35 B.C. 1985 which goes unresolved to this day where no compensation

has been paid including pension rights. The Justice system has been turned upside down in nine provinces due to judicial malfeasance leaving me still as an employee of the Board albeit an unpaid one. Canada's Justice System is the prime casualty including individual rights in Canada leaving Canadians at large without a viable Justice System"' anarchy.

2) As I was going nowhere with the courts of law, I voluntarily put an end to all legalities as of Dec.31-2021; the end date of my first web site: employeescasecanada.ca That should have been the end of the affair vis a vis the law courts. Unfortunately, CV20-849830 (not CV20-

84983 as the Registry altered it) has been pursued by the Applicants where I am an unwilling Respondent considering that I formally dropped the case against the two young lawyers for fraud in February, 2021 giving them and Justice Rogers the opportunity to drop out thus ending this long drawn out affair. Cavan.igh LLP steadfastly refused to drop their very weak case bringing into focus the material filed with the ON Legal Society against them. That Body does not acknowledge their legal mail hence Rogers j will have to provide a court Order to that effect should he choose to pursue any aspect of this Applicant's action. Conversely, he can just drop this 'meaningless Action' due to my declar d departure from Canada's Law Courts.

3) The Applicant, by being adamant in pursuing this case, forces me to qualify credentials; particularly as it relates to Judges (as well as to Kris Dixon of Cavanagh LLP). Included in this letter only to Freeland, is the confidential 2 page letter from the Ontario Judicial Council regarding the status of judges involved in this matter in ON (since 2014). They are all originally Federal Court appointees (including Rogers j.) making the Canadian Council of Judges, under the SCofC and not the Provincial body as the operant oversight institution. That body has never acknowledged their mail by me to them on this level.

QUESTIONS TO KRIS DIXON of CAVANAGH LLP WHERE HE IS LISTED AS AN 'ASSOCIATE'

4) a) Do you have a clear record with the ON Legal Society?

b} I notice that you are a graduate of the UofOttawa in 2002 where you list yourself as being associated with the Common Law Section. Were you were ever called to the Bar? It appears that your career up to 2016 was related to real estate. Were legal qualifications required in that role? Roles you played since that time Involved a legal degree but I do not see any · evidence of later university courses confirming a call to the bar.

FEB. 01-2021 Bissionnette Appellant v. Callow Respondent CV20-849830 H.D. FEBRUARY 11- 2021 (In addition to 3 page background document also asked by Cavanagh LLP (Ken Dixon) to forward a copy to the court.) J pages